For those of you who don't know, this Ashton Ished character is none other than the TD plague formerly know as "Out_of_the_Blue" who trolled this site for quite some time. Successfully, I'll add.
There's no use responding to it. There's no point. Just don't even bother.
How we rid ourselves of this disease before was to auto report any of its posts and just ignore it. Trolls need attention to survive. For those who didn't know better and did respond, they got reported as well (even while their points were often valid and correct). In this way we suffocated it and it left us alone for a while. Seems to be time to do it again.
I encourage everyone to report this troll, ignore it, and report any responses.
the agency’s Tailored Access Operations group has extraordinary capabilities to hack into and “exfiltrate” data from specific computers, even if those computers are highly secured and not connected to the Internet.
How is this even possible? I looked through the linked article and found no mentions of this capability. I understand that in their operations where they intercept packages and add mal/hard-ware to products these could then be subverted to access another network that is connected to the "target" PC/network, but if the systems are fully isolated (and not having wireless capability built-in or attached) I don't see how this could be possible.
I suppose part of the payload they add to a package could be wireless transmitters and they could set up receivers nearby, but that's the only situation where I can imagine getting access to a fully isolated system. Or am I missing something?
Here's right about it being a "gateway", but not in the way he thinks he is ...
This seems very similar to something I've thought/said about pot being called a gateway drug. You're fed all this crap ala "Reefer Madness" about how terrible marijuana is, how it will ruin your live, how it will turn you into some kind of maniac, etc."
But then, you meet people who smoke pot. And they're as "normal" as everyone else. Hell, maybe you even try it yourself. And then it dawns on you: "All this time they've been lying to me about how bad this stuff is. They must be lying about cocaine, heroin, etc."
But, it turns out they're not lying. Too late for too many people.
Crying wolf there about the negative effects of pot is much like the wolf they're shedding tears over that is file sharing.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you guys EVER for a second consider the legal liabilities?
It's not like everyone can see that the "random" avatar on your comments is exactly the same every single time. It's comical that you think you can disown the comments you've been making by pretending that I have you confused with someone else.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you guys EVER for a second consider the legal liabilities?
I've got a friend ...
... who is an auto electrician and the majority of his tools now are a multitude of diagnostic computers for different manufacturers , and for the large part if you don't have the right one the car ain't getting fixed.
And therein lies the problem. They are attempting to create Vendor Lock-in (which they are absolutely free to try to do), but pretending that going against their corporate strategy (i.e. finding a way to fix the equipment that you OWN without their tools) is in some way illegal is asinine.
Just because you are so willing to prostrate yourself to your corporate masters doesn't mean that the rest of us are.