Not free, but you can often get lawyers to send a letter on your behalf for relatively small one-off fees. Depending on the scope of work required to write such a letter, it could cost as little as $50.
Law offices often have form letters already drafted for common matters where they just have insert a few lines of relevant text and it's done.
The extra header(s) are inserted into the packet after it's left your phone and and reached the telco. Therefore depending on where the actual metering of your data usage is done, it may not be included, as it may be inserted after it's already metered your packet.
Of course, it may also be inserted before the metering, so it might be included...
Why do I need a smart TV when I've got a media player that can play shows from my NAS? And a computer for when I want to access other online content? If I really want to view whats on my computer on the TV, I can hook up the computer to the TV.
I don't want a TV that's a computer, I want a TV to display content, and that content is either from the internal FTA tuner or from a video input.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: They're Advertising for New Counsel
I also misread (as I didn't follow the link) and read it more as a retainer, as in 100k for 50 hours work (total), not as a full time job with a yearly salary of 100k and expecting 50hours per week....
Damn, that's pretty shitty pay for a lawyer with 5+ years experience, even if you include the possible 30k bonus.
Not really being a regular Tor user and only knowing at a high level how Tor works, therefore this might be a stupid question, but shouldn't Tor use a random exit node for each request (i.e. each time you click on a link, even if it's a link to another page on the same site, it randomly chooses a different exit node for that request)?
Or can you set up specific routing with Tor? e.g. facebook.com -> exit node X, gayporn.com -> exit node Y, default -> exit node Z?
And to further obfuscate matters, at least for HTTP/S type traffic (non-latency sensitive traffic) shouldn't the exit node add a random delay (say between 20ms and 250ms for arguments sake) to the outgoing request to make it harder to use correlation (user clicked on link at 10:22:32,300 and at 10:22:32,305 exit node sent a request to howtobuildabomb.edu) to 'mush up' everyones requests?
As I understand it, the senate intelligence committee has the legal authority in it's own right to declassify the report. Technically it's only a courtesy, not a requirement, that the White House and CIA are getting a chance to vet and redact the report.
Therefore the committee could formerly, officially and legally release the full unredacted report let alone just the summary.
Therefor the retailer will get a pattern of spending, because customer 56*39(1 purchased a tooth-brush on Monday at the supermarket. On Tuesday they purchased some condoms at the supermarket. on Wednesday they purchased some flowers at the florist who's owned by the same company that owns the supermarket, later that same day they purchased a super vibrating extreme speed dildo at the sex shop chain also owned by the same parent company. The following Monday they went back to the sex shop seeking a refund of the defective dildo, which required them to provide their name, address and telephone number as well as 'waving' the NFC device over the sensor to authorise the refund to Apple Pay.
Now mega-corp AllKnowingMart knows who customer 56*39(1 is and can link all of their purchases to that person.
The token itself should also be encrypted (using a different key each time) so that the retailer can't build up a database of purchases.
that if you do what the patent says, then you are logically "infringing" on the patent,
This is what I don't understand.
If a patent is not valid, it is not a patent. It is a document describing something, it is not a patent. Therefore you can't be "doing what the patent says" because there is no patent. You can be doing what the document describes, but that document is not a patent. It might be a FORMER patent.
A patent is (blatantly copied from USPTO)
a property right granted by the Government of the United States of America to an inventor “to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States” for a limited time...
If a patent is invalid, then there is no property grant, therefore there is no patent, therefore it is not possible to infringe.