Curtis 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (27) comment rss

  • Appeals Court Overturns Perfect 10 Ruling, Says Google Showing Thumbnails Is Fair Use

    Curtis ( profile ), 05 Apr, 2011 @ 05:44am

    Re: Redefine robots.txt

    Google already used the robots.txt as implied permission to index if not supplied in Germany. The open Internet has violated the Communications Act of 1934 since first called the Internet.
    I have sued Google Inc and will not cease pursuing them till Google Inc exists no longer except as a word for searching the Internet.
    The statutory Damages for copyrite violations are already more than GOOG ever has made.
    Last three years of the Docket.
    (5:09-cv-05151)
    Search the Internet without seeing my nude and figurenude original art with a custom search interface.
    www.Go-Oogle.net

  • US Senators Propose Bill To Censor Any Sites The Justice Depatement Declares 'Pirate' Sites, Worldwide

    Curtis ( profile ), 21 Oct, 2010 @ 08:46am

    A legislation using should words old judges understand?

    PORN broadcast by wire has been illegal since the Communications Act of 1934 but is ignored and called the Internet for disguise.

    (5:09-cv-05151) will end this.

    (10-6091), and (10-6240) demand the FCC begin regulating wire communications called the internet to protect PORN.
    See both online 100% for free below.
    Writ of Mandamus, Supplemental Brief Supporting Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

    The last two above are scheduled to be ignored 10-29-2010 or granted. Most filed at the supreme Court are ignored.

    (5:09-cv-05151) goes to a JURY March 28, 2011 and juries do not ignore anything!

  • Google News Thumbnails Illegal In Germany

    Curtis ( profile ), 13 Sep, 2010 @ 08:07pm

    Curtis J Neeley Jr v Google Inc et al.....

    the United States is only a few years behind Germany and this case will be considered by the United States Supreme Court while throwing out US Title 17 and finally fixing it. (10-6240) and (10-6091) will probably be denied to protect porn trafficking.

    Google Inc gets to face an Arkansas J-U-R-Y next year and every other United States search engine will join them by March 31, 2011 or the 221st anniversary of United States' April Fools HOAX called "The copy-right Act" without using the hyphen to fool artist into believing a fundamental right was recognized.

  • Senate Proposes Giving The FCC Authority To Regulate Internet Content… For The Children

    Curtis ( profile ), 29 Aug, 2010 @ 01:59pm

    FCC nonfeasance

    This lawsuit has demanded that the FCC start regulating the FCC as has ALWAYS been their statutory duty according to the Communications Act of 1934 on page eight in paragraph 51.
    Curtis J Neeley Jr v. NameMedia Inc., et al,(10-6091)
    Read it yourself from my evidence! Communications Act of 1934 page eight
    or directly FROM the disobedient FCC=>[PDF] Communications Act of 1934: as ammended by Telecom Act of 1996

  • Senate Proposes Giving The FCC Authority To Regulate Internet Content… For The Children

    Curtis ( profile ), 07 Jul, 2010 @ 06:30pm

    The nonfeasant FCC

    They are an added Defendant in my lawsuit for failing to regulate communications broadcast by wire. That is all the Internet is!

  • The Myth That Without Gov't Monopolies Or Subsidies, Discoveries Will Be Hidden By Secrets

    Curtis ( profile ), 04 Jul, 2010 @ 06:16pm

    copy-right v science v patent

    The moral right to be attributed to an original writing or image has been missing intentionally in the USA for two hundred and twenty years although it was alleged to be covered by various other US laws during debate and passage of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988. What hogwash. Knowledge can't be copy-righted but uses of knowledge can be. The entire purpose for the Unconstitutional US Title 17 was to encourage science by allowing the author to EXCLUSIVELY control publication.
    When my Federal lawsuit resolves copy-right will finally properly lose the hyphen and recognize moral rights enjoyed in many less morally backward countries like Canada and china.

  • Another Google Lawsuit Moves Forward

    Curtis ( profile ), 02 Jul, 2010 @ 07:21pm

    Intersesting lawsuit, but not significant compared to mine.

    I have sued Google and have tried to add every American Search Engine and Google already tried the frivolous motion to dismiss. Portions of the claim were dismissed due to improper anchorage of limitations as a defense at the initial infringement date instead of the last. The Supreme Court already declared that a mistake and although proceeding toward a jury trial I have filed an interlocutory appeal in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. They will receive five copies of the Appellant brief early next week. They will then have fourteen days to file a reply. Google will not settle because their lawyers claim complying with my primary request is impossible.

    I filed an objection to the Google v. Authors Guild settlement and will appeal any settlement allowed to be granted there.
    Short list of tortuous actions.
    1. "Copy-right" claim.
    2. Selling AdWords for keywords displayed on fraudulent websites licensed to AdSense for Domains.
    3. Defamation due to displaying my pornography to children, Muslims, and Atheist, while claiming my specific approval of this. One child was my own.
    4. Scanning my pornography that was in a book in a library in New York and republishing it without my permission.
    5. Profiting from Cybersquatting or US Title 15 1125(d) violations.
    I have asked for establishing a not-for-profit search engine.

    ------Game over
    Money is already not an object for me in this suit.
    Very few litigation cases are about principle and this is as close as I can get.
    I have asked that the FCC be required to regulate communications by signals transmitted by wire. This is NOT a novel idea since it has been their mission since 1936 or the day the FCC was created.
    ------Game over