Taxing the internet were only the last straw of a string of new taxes introduced by his majesty Orban Viktor, who figures himself our glorious ruler.
People are fed up by the government's ad-hoc, incompetent, corrupt politics.
The fact that people were there from every kind of age group and political affiliations is a good indication that this movement is not initiated by one party or organization. I don't think any political party could rally much people, because most of the hungarians doesn't believe in politics anymore.
1. The first demonstration were about the planned tax. One day later the govt. "agreed" (they "planned" this all along) to cap the tax for 700Ft / person, and that it'll be paid by the ISP (lol). The second demonstration were to remind the government, that we don't want cap on the tax, we don't want assurances that the ISP will pay it, we want the tax gone entirely.
2. Theoretically they don't demand the full amount from the ISP. They demand the capped amount per person from the ISP. (which they say won't be shifted to the customers, but that's a complete utter bullshit)
So you see, we're still angry, still up in arms, and the government got another deadline to think this through. If they won't, the next event is scheduled to november, when they vote on the taxes.
The amount of the tax is not THAT big, but it's not the point. The point is that it is a foot-in-the-door tax, set without any kind of consultation with the people of Hungary (democracy? what's that?). That's why people want it gone completely. It's a battle of wills, to remind the government that it (should) serve the people, and not the other way.
In Hungary I _searched_ for TTIP protests in the news, and could only find fringe sites mentioning it, sparsely. No mainstream media, nothing fancy. I wouldn't even know about save for techdirt and some other foreign news sites.
While I agree with you, I'm still pissed about google shoveling down g+ on everyone's throat. This bias is just another attemp to force a product no one really want, but google would benefit from greatly.
The real problem here as I see it: - Everyone is outraged about the hacking and "violating" these women. - No one is concerned about the fuckin' vulnerability the "hacker" used - namely no protection against brute-force attacks - that apple knew about and choose to do nothing.
I'm glad in some way this happened, because if some poor chap did the right thing and reported this with proof, he'd be in prison now, and apple would not got the publicity it deserved.
Remember, embarrassing pictures are the least valuable commodity you can stole. It could be bank account details. Contact lists, blackmail material, etc.
Any serious deployment would be preceded by a lengthy public beta testing phase, where the source code would be published and said black hats would be rewarded lavishly for every found and reported security flaw in the system.
This is, of course, not the case with cronies producing low quality software for outrageous prices.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What is "innocent" palestinian?
"That's it. Fortunately Israel have better economy and many educated and motivated people to build enough weapons to teach those scums a lesson"
You mean like 3B$ US support economy? Or the US manufactured F16? Nuclear weapons "supplied" by the US?
You have a big mouth and big pride, but the fact is, Israel would not exist without US and european support. Israel would not have came to be, and would be obliterated in a minute without western countries supporting your aggression.
By my logic, you over exaggerate the threat Hamas rockets (ha! tubes stuffed with kerosene, with a hand grenade strapped on the top) pose in order to justify excessive military response, genocide and strikes on civilian targets.
Ask them yourself. I doubt they were so pleased by european invaders, and highly doubt they were called terrorists for defending their home (with arrows and bows against guns, much like the hamas-israel situation).
Sure, sweep every damning evidence under the rug! At your convenience Sir!