by Mike Masnick
Thu, Aug 25th 2011 7:00pm
A few weeks ago, AT&T accidentally revealed that it had a plan to cover 97% of the population with its 4G/LTE service. That's a big deal, because a big part of the rationale for the T-Mobile merger was that it simply could not deliver that kind of coverage without the merger. AT&T has worked furiously since then to basically deny what the filing clearly stated. They've been doing so by trying to change around what basic words mean (which is kind of funny). However, it looks like they haven't convinced one rather important player. The FCC is now asking for evidence that AT&T actually needs T-Mobile as it keeps claiming. It's still pretty likely that this all gets approved, but it definitely has presented pretty clearly how the rationales being given for why this deal is "necessary" are hogwash. No one denies that it will be much easier for AT&T, but that's not the same thing as necessary.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- One Year Later, ISP Claims That Title II Would Demolish Broadband Investment Found To Be Total, Indisputable Bullshit
- Congressmen Upton, Walden Latest To Insist Nobody Needs Faster Broadband
- Comcast Using Minority Astroturf Groups To Argue Cable Set Top Box Competition Hurts Diversity
- States Wake Up, Realize AT&T Lobbyists Have Been Writing Awful Protectionist State Broadband Laws
- ISPs Are Trampling Net Neutrality While The FCC Sits Boxed In By Lawsuits, Upcoming Election