Details Of Apple's Lawsuit Against Samsung Revealed; And It's Even More Ridiculous

from the steve-jobs-would-sue-his-sister dept

When we wrote about Apple's new lawsuit against Samsung over its new phones and tablets looking too much like Apple's iPhone and iPad, the full legal complaint from Apple wasn't yet public. However, it's now coming out, and the detailed list of patents and trademarks at issue make this seem ridiculous. While the initial report we saw yesterday showed only design patents, the lawsuit actually covers utility patents, design patents, trademarks and trade dress claims. Here they are in all their glory, as compiled and described by Florian Mueller: As the article suggests, Steve Jobs would sue his own family if they made a reasonable Android device. This is a kitchen sink lawsuit, where Apple is throwing everything at Samsung, and once again, the sheer pettiness of the whole thing after looking over the really quite minor patents and trademarks being asserted here seems to scream only one thing: Samsung has apparently designed an awesome phone and tablet device that has Steve Jobs scared of competition.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Pickle Monger (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 2:53pm

    Solution for Samsung

    In terms of appearance of the smartphone, just make it look like the mythical white iPhone 4...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    athe (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 3:56pm

    Talk about throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks...

    Can't wait to see what Samsung comes back at them with - I can't believe that they wouldn't have something.

    I'm guessing that the iPhone 5 wont be very innovative if this is the tact that Apple are taking now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jeff, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 4:10pm

    Apple hates competition. It's a fact.

    They will do anything to keep competition away, because they like to think they are the absolute best...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Lesath (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 4:21pm

    Yet one more reason I will never have an Apple Product.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 4:26pm

    Yep

    If they are getting both barrels of Apple's BS, Apple must be worried they're losing the innovation race. Time to check out Samsung, I guess; Apple seems to think they've got a really good product.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    umccullough (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 4:49pm

    Trademarks on individual icons?

    I must admit, I was surprised to see that they've trademarked individual icons...

    I can understand if your icon contains a logo... but beyond copyright protection so nobody blatantly rips off your artwork, seriously?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 6:57pm

      Re: Trademarks on individual icons?

      Those icons look really generic to me. There's nothing distinctive about them. Doesn't something you make have to be kinda unique before you can trademark it?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        DannyB (profile), Apr 20th, 2011 @ 8:17am

        Re: Re: Trademarks on individual icons?

        Two issues for icons: Trade Mark and Copyright.
        (Let's not get into whether icons should be patentable.)

        For trade mark, being unique and distinctive makes a mark more protectable.

        For copyright, there must be some minimum amount of creativity in order to be protected.

        If an icon is of a third party design, say Amazon or NetFlix, then Apple may not have any Trade Mark or Copyright rights in it. Especially if Apple didn't create the app that presents the icon.

        Even if Apple created the app for a third party, say Amazon or Netflix, and another party creates similar apps for Android apps for Amazon or Netflix, then Apple wouldn't ahve trademark rights in the trademarks of the respective companies', but Apple might have copyright rights in the "creativity" expressed in the icon designs. I suspect very little creativity is expressed, such as background color the icon is displayed against. Even that may not be protectable under copyright or trademark.

        If a third party designs (work for hire) Android apps for example for Amazon and Netflix, and even if they use the identical icon used on the iPhone, the entire icon may be the property of Amazon / Netflix (example) and Apple may have no rights in the icon design whatsoever.

        IANAL and this is not legal advice.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    mrtraver (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:08pm

    Lawsuits gone wild aren't nearly as fun as girls gone wild.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:57pm

      Re:

      U.S. Patent No. 7,762,818 on "girls in various states of undress shouting "WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"

      U.S. Patent No. 7,644,114 on a "method and apparatus for displaying said girls in various states of undress shouting "WOOOOOOOOOO!"

      U.S. Patent No. 6,803,072 on "girls in various states of undress raising alcoholic beverages and shouting "WOOOOOOO!"

      U.S. Patent No. 8,969,311 on "guys in various states of Abercrombie & Fitch raising alcoholic beverages and shouting "WOOOOOOOOOO!" at said girls in various states of undress shouting "WOOOOOOOO!"

      U.S. Patent No. 6,174,915 on "exposed female breasts"

      U.S. Patent No. 6,174,916 on a "method and apparatus utilizing a separate girl in a varied state of undress to expose breasts of another girl in a varied state of undress via a lifting apparatus [hands/arms]"

      U.S. Patent No. 5,003,123 on a "bulletproof release/resignation of publicity rights form"

      U.S. Patent No. 5,603,4543 on a "Rohypnol"

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Andrew (profile), Apr 20th, 2011 @ 10:33am

        Re: Re:

        Ooh! I saw one of those a little while ago.

        U.S. Patent No. 6,803,072 on "girls in various states of undress raising alcoholic beverages and shouting "WOOOOOOO!"

        Abstract

        Apparatus and methods are disclosed for the disrobing and subsequent public display and video recording of inebriated girls. Significant quantities of cocktails, vodka or other alcoholic beverages are provided to ensure effective intoxication of party participants. An atmosphere conducive disrobing is provided through party participants shouting, “WOOOOOOOOO!” (U.S. Patent No. 7,762,818), a self-perpetuating state also believed to be a novel form of perpetual motion (U.S. Pat. Pend.). Girls remove some or all of their clothing, exposing areas of their bodies including (but not limited to) breasts, back, some or all of the buttocks, breasts, thighs. And breasts. Still images and moving video footage of participants is recorded and subsequently widely distributed for profit.

        Anyone have the full patent?

        On a more serious note, here's another writeup of this patent dispute, with pretty pictures and everything.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:22pm

    I feel I must....

    ... call here upon my patent; 8,999,666 "A method of showing contempt for silly IP law by exposing intimate anatomy parts in a lewdly insulting but not quite illegal manner." :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    why get a patent then?, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:34pm

    Apple is correct in pursuing patent infringements. They are required to vigoriously defend them. Patents are meant to protect property and intellectual rights developed and executed. This is blatant copying like in grade school. Why get a patent then ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Dave, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:38pm

      Re:

      "Why get a patent then ?"

      Exactly. The only winning move is not to play.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      umccullough (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 6:18pm

      Re:

      I think you're mixing up patents and trademarks there, the latter requires the owner to defend them if they wish to keep them.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      senshikaze (profile), Apr 20th, 2011 @ 4:43am

      Re:

      I'm going to just assume you are a troll.
      I would bet you would defend the patent lawsuits keeping life saving drugs out of dieing people's hand as well.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Steve, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 6:45am

      Re:

      It that "developed" part that's really at issue. And it really isn't Apple we're all frustrated with, it's the state of IP law in this country. We take it out on Apple because they love to abuse it.

      Do you really think Apple "developed" anything when they decided to use a picture of a phone's handset to represent a phone? Do you think that anybody picking up a Samsung phone from the Android section of Best Buy will see that icon and think to themselves, "Well this phone says Samsung and it's not by the iPhones on that pedestal over there, but the phone icon looks similar so it must be an iPhone."

      Trademarks were originally designed to protect consumers, not to prevent competition.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Prashanth (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:35pm

    I will say that Samsung could possibly have designed different-looking icons to avoid the trademark lawsuits, though I'm not sure how broadly the trademarks cover the icons (whether it covers the particular icon designs or just having icons representing these functions, period). Also, it isn't clear exactly how broad/specific the patents are on "electronic device". Otherwise, wow. Just, wow.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Apr 20th, 2011 @ 8:22am

      Re:

      The elements of icon designs may not even be too generic to protect.

      You should definitely draw your own original artwork and create your own from scratch icon files. But the idea of using an old fashioned telephone handset from the 20th century as an icon to place a call should not be protectable. It is functional. It's also arguably not even original or novel (eg, lacks creativity for copyright, is not distinct enough for trademark).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    iamtheky (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 5:36pm

    "awesome phone and tablet"

    -or this is a default response regardless of the awesomeness

    not so much a kitchen sink lawsuit as it is the new boilerplate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Jim (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 6:25pm

    A good write up.

    I know, I know. Everyone loves to beat on Apple but this is a good write up. Although we all might agree things in the patent/design area need to be fixed you can't hate a company for doing what the system has basically forced them to do. They are a company not a person for farks sake already. It is really getting tiresome to see everyone cutting off their nose to spite their face.

    Now to the link. http://thisismynext.com/2011/04/19/apple-sues-samsung-analysis/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    James, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 9:18pm

    It seems..

    Apple is using chips from Samsung for memory and possibly CPUs for the iPhone/Pad, I guess Samsung could just tell them to f**k off, and cut them off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    TheOnly92, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 9:35pm

    Well, maybe they're thinking: since we're suing anyway, might as well just sue every possible aspect.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    You've never read a lawsuit before, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 9:40pm

    Hi,
    Have you ever read a civil complaint before? It pretty common to include every possible issue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), Apr 19th, 2011 @ 10:15pm

      Re:

      Hi,
      Have you ever read a civil complaint before? It pretty common to include every possible issue.


      Hi,
      Have you ever read Techdirt before? We cover civil lawsuits in detail all the time. Doesn't make this any less ridiculous.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    You've never read a lawsuit before, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 9:40pm

    Hi,
    Have you ever read a civil complaint before? It pretty common to include every possible issue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Frost, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 10:46pm

    Good thing we're rich

    Good thing mankind is incredibly efficient and rich in reality today, otherwise shenanigans like these (extrapolated out across all of society... this is not exactly the only resource wastage insanity going on) would have more than merely 1 billion of us starving and kids would be dying needlessly even quicker than merely one every five seconds. Aren't we lucky?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Alex, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 11:58pm

    Steve jobs is a bafoon

    And look what happens when apple feels threatened.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 2:44am

    Comparing The Pictures ...

    ... the Samsung is so obviously inferior in design to the Apple, only someone with no taste would confuse the two.

    Look how closely they copied Apple’s innovative design ideas, it almost looks exactly like an Iphone. How dare they!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 5:00am

    Apple is done innovating and has begun litigating...

    I have a friend who drank the Apple juice and has all things Apple. He says that Apple's days of innovation are over and they aren't really doing anything new now. Google is the innovator now and Apple realizes that they are going to have to relax their vice like grip on the iPhone & iPad to compete. And we all know that Apple is not going to give up control without a fight.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 6:40am

      Re: Apple is done innovating and has begun litigating...

      If they release their vice like grip on the iphone, it might not even drop calls!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 7:17am

    I have a solution. Patent this: "Method of filing a patent to the patent office by paper or electronic means" that way every asswipe who tries to patent is infringing and i'm not licensing to them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Joey, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 7:50am

    Apple product will be as great as their supplier.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 7:58am

    Yeeees, this is a sign Samsung Tablets are good!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 20th, 2011 @ 10:54am

    This has somewhat of a ring to it as was the case when Apple took on Microsoft after its introduction of Win95, but with numerous (and substantial) differences. Then hardware was not an issue, nor were industrial designs, nor were trademarks.

    The Apple v. Microsoft case had as its gravamen claimed similarities between the Apple OS GUI and the Win95 GUI, and that the similarities were such that Apple proceeded on the basis of copyright infringement.

    In contrast, here we seem to be talking about hardware manufacturers, and not a harware manufacturer versus a software vendor. In other words, this case revolves around direct competitiors involved in the production and vending of hardware. In my view this is an important distinction.

    Love them or hate them, Apple is clearly an innovator in the field of industrial design. It does not seem at all unreasonable for Apple to seek leveling the playing field by having others acquire their own design expertise, and then present products to consumers that distinguish themselves over those of Apple.

    As for the comment suggesting that Apple is asserting a host of relatively minor rights, I can only wonder on what basis this assertion is made (besides, of course, "IP is silly" generalizations).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Apr 20th, 2011 @ 11:27am

    Who copied whom?

    Please take a look at this:

    http://phandroid.com/2011/04/20/did-apple-really-steal-their-iphone-design-from-samsung-pot -meet-kettle/

    Did Apple's iPhone copy the design of a Samsung phone released prior to the iPhone?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Tom, May 24th, 2011 @ 6:43am

    The HTC Wallaby aka XDA was released in 2002 the iPhone come out in 2007. This is the first sign Apple is now past peak, they are litigating vs. innovating. Look at the SCO v. Linux lawsuit to get an idea of how this waste of time and money will work out. I was leaning towards Apple more over the past year, but I am now afraid to put my eggs in one (closed eco system) basket that fears competition.Nail your competition with a killer product not lawsuits.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sang, Aug 9th, 2011 @ 5:59pm

    apple being petty

    next it will be "awh nuh uh samsung we used a 10.1" SCREEN, you can't cause we did... apple please....silly patent infringment are silly there shouldn't be the ability to patent such stupid things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Pugazendhi Asaimuthu, Aug 10th, 2011 @ 11:50am

    Alternative to Apple's patent number 7844915 exists!

    I hold a patent application that provides a cool alternative to Apple's patent number 7844915! No scrolling necessary. Hang in there till the solution comes out!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    shivaji, Feb 18th, 2014 @ 12:35am

    mentally disturbe about samsung core mobile

    This is Shivaji Lohar, I have bought new mobile phone (Mobile model - Galaxy Samsung Core, bill number: (UAP):2045526 TIN/CST no:-28026280297 IMEI Number: 359710050247197) Hyderabad(Gachibowli) showroom ( 2nd Avenue ) on 12/JAN/2014 around 1 PM.
    Issue:-
    The very next day from the date of purchase I noticed that there is a NETWORK ISSUE with mobile. I tried using different SIM cards, but every time I was disappointed as none of the SIM was working in the Phone. The same SIM is working properly in other Cell Phones.
    The Error message is like:- “MOBILE NETWORK NOT REGISTERED”. Due to which I cannot use any of the SIM services provided such as Making & Receiving Calls, SMS Facilities etc.
    If this is the case then what is the Purpose of Purchasing the New Phone…? By spending amount Rs 13350/- if the Phone is not serving the purpose for what it is meant for, then for what purpose it should serve…?
    Contact number--9581775514 8125660054

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This