by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 3rd 2011 2:54am
It's been nearly a decade since we first started calling out various broadband providers for hyping up their connections speeds using "up to" language, where they say you may get speeds "up to" X Mbps. Up to is the ultimate weasel phrase, because you never have to get anywhere near it, and can actually be well under it, and still be "accurate." Every so often federal regulators jump into the debate -- warning companies about this practice. At least a few broadband providers (especially in the US) have started to move away from using "up to" marketing. But it still is rare to see regulators actually go after anyone for making such misleading claims. Broadband Reports points out that UK telco regulator Ofcom seems to come out with a report every single year at this time promising that it's about to crack down on "up to" marketing, but never actually doing so. At some point, companies realize that the threats about "up to" language are about as accurate as the "up to" claims themselves.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- The Mere Threat Of Google Fiber Has Time Warner Cable Offering Speeds Six Times Faster At The Same Price
- One ISP's Prices Are So Bad, It Refuses To Tell Anyone What They Are
- AT&T Publicly Promises Tennessee A Broadband Revolution, Privately Fights To Keep It A Broadband Backwater
- AT&T Shows Cupertino Precisely What Broadband Competition (Or The Lack Thereof) Looks Like
- Comcast, CenturyLink Give New Home Owner Kafka-esque Introduction To U.S. Broadband Market