by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 3rd 2011 2:54am
It's been nearly a decade since we first started calling out various broadband providers for hyping up their connections speeds using "up to" language, where they say you may get speeds "up to" X Mbps. Up to is the ultimate weasel phrase, because you never have to get anywhere near it, and can actually be well under it, and still be "accurate." Every so often federal regulators jump into the debate -- warning companies about this practice. At least a few broadband providers (especially in the US) have started to move away from using "up to" marketing. But it still is rare to see regulators actually go after anyone for making such misleading claims. Broadband Reports points out that UK telco regulator Ofcom seems to come out with a report every single year at this time promising that it's about to crack down on "up to" marketing, but never actually doing so. At some point, companies realize that the threats about "up to" language are about as accurate as the "up to" claims themselves.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Comcast Users Now Need To Pay A $30 Premium If They Want To Avoid Usage Caps
- Study: 15% Of Wireless Users Now Tracked By Stealth Headers, Or 'Zombie Cookies'
- ISP Can't Figure Out How To Automate A Password Reset, But Is Happy To E-mail Your Password In Plain Text
- Comcast Admits Broadband Usage Caps Are A Cash Grab, Not An Engineering Necessity
- FCC May Finally Include Price & Usage Caps When Weighing Broadband Deployment Progress