by Mike Masnick
Mon, Sep 13th 2010 4:21am
Eric Goldman points us to the news that Google has been sued, in a class action lawsuit, over problems with the Nexus One, the Android phone (made by HTC) that Google released directly, in an attempt to get others to release better Android-powered phones. As with many new products, there were some bugs, and Google (and T-Mobile, on which the Nexus One worked) didn't quite know how to handle customer support for the device -- a pretty massive mistake. However, is it really against the law to sell a product with a few bugs and to to have really dismally crappy customer service? It seems like a stretch. You can make the argument that the product didn't do what was promised, but, like so many class action lawsuits, this one seems like a case of "gee, can we squeeze a bunch of money out of this company?"
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Much Of Europe's Regulatory Interest In Silicon Valley Is Just Jealousy Over Successful Foreign Companies?
- Obama Administration Files Totally Clueless Argument Concerning Software Copyrights In Supreme Court Case
- Warner Bros. And Rightscorp Argue That Copyright Trolling Is Protected By The First Amendment
- Class Action Lawsuit Over Apple DRM Stumbles Because Plaintiffs Aren't Actually In The Class
- General Mills Says If You 'Like' Cheerios On Facebook, You Can No Longer Sue