Getting Past The Uncanny Valley In Targeted Advertising

from the from-creepy-to-useful dept

A few years back we talked about how the concept of the "uncanny valley" could be applied to targeted advertising. Of course, the general concept of the uncanny valley is usually discussed in the field of robotics. It's the notion that people are comfortable with robots that clearly look like robots, but at a point where they become too similar to humans, but not actually human-like, people feel rather uncomfortable. However, if a robot appears fully human, then people go back to being comfortable with them -- even to the point of identifying with them and feeling empathy for them. The problem is the area where they're "too human" but just different enough to just... feel "off" that somehow makes it "creepy." As we noted the same thing really was kind of true for targeted advertising. As advertising gets more "targeted" it seems to creep people out, because they feel like they're being spied on.

A perfect example of that is seen in this recent NYTimes Magazine piece, talking about the details of how Target mines its purchasing data to figure out who's pregnant and when they're due. And it's not because they're buying diapers or something like that:
The only problem is that identifying pregnant customers is harder than it sounds. Target has a baby-shower registry, and Pole started there, observing how shopping habits changed as a woman approached her due date, which women on the registry had willingly disclosed. He ran test after test, analyzing the data, and before long some useful patterns emerged. Lotions, for example. Lots of people buy lotion, but one of Pole's colleagues noticed that women on the baby registry were buying larger quantities of unscented lotion around the beginning of their second trimester. Another analyst noted that sometime in the first 20 weeks, pregnant women loaded up on supplements like calcium, magnesium and zinc. Many shoppers purchase soap and cotton balls, but when someone suddenly starts buying lots of scent-free soap and extra-big bags of cotton balls, in addition to hand sanitizers and washcloths, it signals they could be getting close to their delivery date.

As Pole's computers crawled through the data, he was able to identify about 25 products that, when analyzed together, allowed him to assign each shopper a "pregnancy prediction" score. More important, he could also estimate her due date to within a small window, so Target could send coupons timed to very specific stages of her pregnancy.
But, of course, Target then appears to have run into the "uncanny valley" problem of having just enough info to target ads... but doing so in a way that feels creepy:
"If we send someone a catalog and say, 'Congratulations on your first child!' and they've never told us they're pregnant, that's going to make some people uncomfortable," Pole told me. "We are very conservative about compliance with all privacy laws. But even if you're following the law, you can do things where people get queasy."

About a year after Pole created his pregnancy-prediction model, a man walked into a Target outside Minneapolis and demanded to see the manager. He was clutching coupons that had been sent to his daughter, and he was angry, according to an employee who participated in the conversation.

"My daughter got this in the mail!" he said. "She's still in high school, and you're sending her coupons for baby clothes and cribs? Are you trying to encourage her to get pregnant?"

The manager didn't have any idea what the man was talking about. He looked at the mailer. Sure enough, it was addressed to the man's daughter and contained advertisements for maternity clothing, nursery furniture and pictures of smiling infants. The manager apologized and then called a few days later to apologize again.

On the phone, though, the father was somewhat abashed. "I had a talk with my daughter," he said. "It turns out there's been some activities in my house I haven't been completely aware of. She's due in August. I owe you an apology."
Target appears to have recognized just how creepy this appeared -- and once they discovered that the reporter was working on this story they cut off his access to the researcher and wouldn't talk to him at all, other than to make bland PR statements about "delivering outstanding value," and, later, to try to convince him not to publish his story.

However, there are indications that Target tried to cross the uncanny valley.... by making the extremely targeted advertising appear more "life like" by not being "too perfect." That is they still sent targeted ads, but mixed them in with unrelated ads, so people wouldn't realize how targeted they were:
"We have the capacity to send every customer an ad booklet, specifically designed for them, that says, 'Here's everything you bought last week and a coupon for it,' " one Target executive told me. "We do that for grocery products all the time." But for pregnant women, Target's goal was selling them baby items they didn't even know they needed yet.

"With the pregnancy products, though, we learned that some women react badly," the executive said. "Then we started mixing in all these ads for things we knew pregnant women would never buy, so the baby ads looked random. We'd put an ad for a lawn mower next to diapers. We'd put a coupon for wineglasses next to infant clothes. That way, it looked like all the products were chosen by chance.

"And we found out that as long as a pregnant woman thinks she hasn't been spied on, she'll use the coupons. She just assumes that everyone else on her block got the same mailer for diapers and cribs. As long as we don't spook her, it works."
I'm sure that this disturbs some people, who may sense that there's "trickery" going on here, but I'm not sure that's the case. It seems like this actually creates something rather useful. After all, perfectly targeted ads actually provide useful information in that it's ads/deals/coupons targeted for exactly what we need, such that we'll actually save money on the key things we want. That's a benefit to consumers. But if it's done in a way that doesn't feel as creepy, then there aren't those lingering concerns of being tracked -- and that seems a more reasonable fear.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 8:06pm

    I'm creeped out. The more ads I see, the less likely I am to buy the product even coupons and mailers. I just don't like the intrusion.

    I will admit it's not as deceptive as other tactics like paying reviewers on Amazon for positive reviews.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 8:17am

      Re:

      And the answer is...spend cash only.

      Don't use credit or debit cards.

      Don't use coupons mailed to you (they may have some identifying code on them).

      Don't use club cards. They are specifically designed to add your purchases to their database, with identifying information.

      If you do these things, they will only have information regarding what they sold, not who they sold it to. If you do, do these things, you are giving them not only permission to track you, but you are supplying them with personally identifiable information so that they can track you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Robert Doyle (profile), Feb 24th, 2012 @ 11:12am

      Re:

      Dude, your first three words summed it up for me exactly.

      And I have to admit I don't even mind being spied on in this fashion (I know, I'm weird that way - maybe just a bit too exhibitionist...) but I am totally feeling the 'uncanny valley' of this.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jesse (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 8:14am

      Re:

      I make a point of not hitting advertisements. I actively try to avoid falling into that trap. I do not want to encourage this behaviour. That said, I'm also probably subconsciously craving something they whispered in my ear as I slept.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 8:15pm

    Is just like setting traps for game in the park LoL

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 8:17pm

    Target stalking its prey.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    A Guy (profile), Feb 17th, 2012 @ 8:26pm

    I also find the whole targeted advertisement thing creepy. I need to know how and why I am being tracked, how that information is being used, and who may potentially see the data. Is the fact that I let a friend use my computer to look up medical symptoms lead back to me, possibly coming to the attention of a HR department when applying for jobs? Could my curiosity about physics and engineering lead to governmental actors like homeland security wondering why I'm reading about high energy particle interactions?

    No one is going to reveal their trade secrets to me, so I just do my best to ignore most ads and keep my information mostly private.

    It's actually become a disincentive for customer loyalty to me. If your information is spread around between different stores and online services, it makes it more difficult to build an informative profile.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 8:31pm

      Re:

      Think about it for a second, this is a two way street, they collect data and analyze it, you can too and find out things about them that they probably would not want you to know.

      For example based on data available one could probably predict when they are going to have a firesale to get rid of stock, find out if a store is more likely to be closed or not and so stay clear of that place for employment.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 3:27am

        Re: Re:

        Most people don't have the resources to do that. You would have to get another company to do it for you.

        I've already heard of *some* companies giving out about that kind of information and in-depth cross-comparison between them and their competitors.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 5:17am

          Re: Re: Re:

          If you mean most people don't know how to use proxies and don't know how to program little crawlers you are correct, but the data is there and can be acquired by any individual with a laptop and some javascript knowledge.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            John Fenderson (profile), Feb 19th, 2012 @ 11:38am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "but the data is there and can be acquired by any individual with a laptop and some javascript knowledge."

            Which counts out most people right there. And even once you've gathered the data, you have to analyze it, which counts out most people who do have javascript skills.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ilfar, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:04pm

    Target Me!

    Pfffh, target me with ads tailored to my browsing all you want. Google already thinks I like computers, games... and women's underwear :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    DogBreath, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:21pm

    The coming creep factor is inevitable.

    They already have the database on you. "Minority Report" here we come.

    Minority Report personalized commercials

    and

    "Minority Report" advertising arrives

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:28pm

    Not the Pressing Issue

    Getting past the uncanny valley in advertising? I'd like to see us get past the uncanny valley in the GOP primaries. Has anyone actually watched Mitt Romney speak?

    I'd bet the contents of my wallet that the guy eats old people's medicine for fuel.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      A Guy (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 1:32am

      Re: Not the Pressing Issue

      I like South Parks analogy that every election comes down to a douche bag and a turd sandwich, but I think we need more choices to take the GOP primary into account.

      I nominate a cracked pot and an ass wipe.

      You can choose who is who at home.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        weneedhelp (profile), Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 11:36am

        Re: Re: Not the Pressing Issue

        "I nominate a cracked pot" - Ron Paul!!!!

        Sorry R.P., this jab would have come eventually.


        "and an ass wipe." Newt, how the hell are ya?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:34pm

    I don't have a problem with a particular store monitoring my purchases with them and using that information to better serve my needs as they perceive them; this seems little more than applying modern technology to the traditional vendor/customer relationship.

    However, were the store to share that information with anybody else, then it becomes a privacy issue and the store has violated my trust. Since corporations often engage in a diversity of commerce across a spectrum of markets, the sharing of personally identifiable shopping trends should at most be based upon the branding of the vendors -- information should not be shared between corporations, nor between what might reasonably be perceived as different companies within the same corporation (e.g., Kmart and Sears), without explicit approval of the customer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Feb 19th, 2012 @ 6:03am

      Re:

      I also don't have an issue with the gathering of the information per se, so long as they keep that information to themselves. I really don't think I would object to the sharing within a corporation (i.e. Kmart/Sears), but agree that explicit permission should be granted by the "target" of the data (me). My concern lies more with how well the company anonomizes and protects the data from theft. Kmart and Sears just want to sell me diapers and lawnmowers, and make sure that I bring the kids when I shop so that I spend more, criminal and government agencies have altogether different uses for the data.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Feb 19th, 2012 @ 11:40am

      Re:

      "I don't have a problem with a particular store monitoring my purchases with them and using that information to better serve my needs as they perceive them"

      I'm glad that you don't have a problem with that. I do. A huge problem. Sharing the data they've compiled escalates that from a huge problem to them being actively evil.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Zos (profile), Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:36pm

    it's not the targeted advertising i find creepy, it's not knowing who else has access to the data, how well secured it is, how thorough they are about eliminating identifying information... same things i worry about giving any information, to anyone, ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    monkyyy, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 9:50pm

    it is a bit creepy but i think an easy way to get through the valley would be to have a human readable eula explaining what hey are doing w/ ur data

    im fine w/ gmails ads because they make enough mistakes about what im interested in that no human would make, those "get the irs off ur back" ads showing up mostly when im reading a political newsletter isnt to hard to see how that mistake was made

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jesse (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 8:16am

      Re:

      But didn't you RTFA? Target is putting mistakes in intentionally to disguise how much they know. Perhaps gmail's mistakes are just as intentional, to lull you into the false sense of security you just expressed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 17th, 2012 @ 10:37pm

    Another way to view this would be an opportunity to mess with their "bots" a bit by me using my 90 year olf father's phone number (and paying cash) - tampons and hemorrhoids...

    I think pharmacies were given the ok to use customer data a few years. That one bothered me a lot since there was no way to opt out,

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Eclecticdave (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 3:19am

    Just 'fess up

    Surely the customers were spooked only because they were unaware of how the magic trick worked. If they just added a link to a FAQ that said basically "we're not stalking you, here's how we're doing it" maybe that's all that's needed?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    abc gum, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 8:20am

    "Target appears to have recognized just how creepy this appeared"

    If it appears creepy then it probably is, but they are only concerned about appearances and attempt to cover it up rather than - you know - stop doing creepy shit.

    So they make it less obvious to the casual observer whilst in the background developing more intrusive strategies. Consumer information aggregation across businesses has the potential to take creepy to the next level. I'm not sure if it is even demonstrably cost effective for a business or whether these people just simply like to spy on everyone.

    Soon, if not already, the health insurance industry and a host of others will set premiums based upon information gleaned from your loyalty program(s), credit card transactions and social media postings. The automobile insurance industry is already offering a discount if you allow them to track your ass via GPS.

    Have you seen the tags in the grocery stores which attempt to put a number on the "healthiness" of products? When, not if, this information is used to determine your health insurance premium(s) there will be incentive for the product producers to adjust their numbers such that consumers will choose their product over the competitor based upon that number. Since it is difficult and expensive to actually make a more healthy product, bribery will rule the grocery store isles - much more than it already does.

    Maybe I'll go back to only using cash and wear those glasses with a built-in mustache just to mess with their facial recognition systems. At this point, I doubt they realize just how ridiculous their whole realm of thinking is. Oh yeah ... and we are paying for all this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      dcee (profile), Feb 20th, 2012 @ 6:41am

      Re:

      So they make it less obvious to the casual observer whilst in the background developing more intrusive strategies. Consumer information aggregation across businesses has the potential to take creepy to the next level. I'm not sure if it is even demonstrably cost effective for a business or whether these people just simply like to spy on everyone.


      That my friend, is a really good question.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Nom du Clavier (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 9:40am

    Morning sickness...

    "We are very conservative about compliance with all privacy laws. But even if you're following the law, you can do things where people get queasy."


    CEO: What if we have staff on hand to help our female customers conceive?

    Researcher: Our model predicts we'll be able to sell more ginger ale and crackers, to begin with.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 10:56am

    Trying to hide the fact that you are tracking individual customers is way creepier than anything that is happening otherwise. Not only is it it creepy appearing when they get the "right" ad for you, but it's doubly creepy when you realize they are watching you all the time.

    This sort of thing is "effecient", but it is also very invasive. Having that much sorted customer information is a huge risk. In theory, things could get out about you that perhaps you don't want anyone to know. Why should they be allowed to keep this level of profile on anyone?

    The US seems woefully lacking in privacy protection.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 11:12am

    Social Engineering Campaign

    Those that freely share bits of information they have gleaned about others are called gossips. I don't even know what those that charge for the information are called. Time to start a social engineering campaign equating the sharing or use of such information to the town gossip - even though what they are doing might be legal they are someone to shun.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Christopher Weigel (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 11:20am

    Hmm. I think I'd actually appreciate targeted coupons from them.

    Like, specifically targeted. Anyone know how I can sign up?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      F!, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 4:57pm

      Re:

      Too easy: target.com
      I'm sure they actually have a sign up page for email ads, and they probably include fields for physical address, birth date, gender, etc...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Josh (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 12:15pm

    I would not want to be that daughter after the advertising was more truthful than she was about her pregnancy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Wolfy, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 12:55pm

    Bravo to the father in the anecdote... I thought that level of honesty and manners was long extinct.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    leichter (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 1:55pm

    Forbes picked up on this with two articles. One pretty much summarized what the Times said; the other looked into the question of what limits there were on Target should they decide to sell this data. Their conclusion: At present, pretty much none. That data is Target's to do with as they like. Were they to have a privacy policy, they would be bound by it - but they've never published one.

    One person they spoke to is certain that this will soon change - that within 5 years, there might be limits on what data Target can collect, and there will certainly be limits on what they can sell. I pretty sure that's true.

    By the way, it's important to keep in mind that Target - and every other company that does targeted advertising - always emphasizes that the positive value to the customer in delivering ads that describe products they might actually need. But that's of course not why the companies are doing this. The point is to sell more products. In fact, it's pointed out in these articles that the reason Target is so interested in discovering pregnant women and marketing to them is that it's long been known that young families tend to "bond" to certain brands (and likely places to buy them). Get them early and they'll keep coming back. Those early special discounts will be repaid many times over by full-price purchases.

    Is there something wrong with this? Probably not, but just as there's a line where "clever" becomes "creepy", there's a line where "attractive" becomes "manipulative". It's never clear where the line is until after you've crossed it.

    Many years ago, the group I worked for at a large company moved to a brand new facility. There was a committee that helped in designing various amenities, like the cafeteria. One decision was on the color. A consultant on the matter recommended (I think) yellow, because studies had shown that people bought more food in a yellow cafeteria. OK Ö but who is going with yellow good for? It's certainly good for the company running the cafeteria; but for everyone else working there, probably not. Whenever you see clever ideas like data mining to find pregnant women Ö ask yourself: Cui bono? Who benefits?


    -- Jerry

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      TtfnJohn (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 9:25pm

      Re:

      The other extra "advantage" to this sort of thing, or so they tell you, is that they can more efficiently stock a store.

      Funny thing happened when they renovated the Safeway in my town is that they had to know from sales scans that farmed salmon just didn't sell here. Fish farms aren't popular in these parts so people insist on fish and salmon marked wild.

      There were other stocking mistakes where the store was stocked with things people don't buy here or in quantities they don't buy them in.

      The fish screw up took a week to fix and the rest of it is still sorting itself out.

      If the idea, which they claim it is with loyalty cards and such, is better targeted ads and stores stocked with what customers buy then this experience is that it failed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Feb 19th, 2012 @ 11:51am

        Re: Re:

        But Safeway didn't need individual purchasing records to determine those stocking mistakes. They would have been equally obvious -- or even more so -- simply by looking at what sold and didn't sell in general.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Jesse (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 8:24am

        Re: Re:

        The trick with safeway is to just give them some random phone number until you find one that has a loyalty card attached. Get the discount without the tracking.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    pr, Feb 18th, 2012 @ 4:50pm

    Where nobody knows you're name

    The denizens of Cheers might want to drink where everybody knows their names, but I prefer to shop where nobody knows my name. If they don't have my personal data, they can't abuse it.

    That's why I won't go into a Kroger for any reason. They pretty much demand that you hand over your identity to shop there. I just don't think it's worth it to save fifteen cents on a can of peas.It's kind of hard to avoid them because they like to buy out local chains, leaving them the same on the outside while they turn them into Krogers on the inside. Kind of like "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      GP, Feb 20th, 2012 @ 11:48pm

      Re: Where nobody knows you're name

      You could just sign up for their shopper card using
      a fake name and a random address (local McDonalds, unused
      address that falls between 2 houses). I'm pretty sure
      they don't ID people really thoroughly. ^_^

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), Feb 18th, 2012 @ 8:07pm

    actually getting annoyed at targeted ads.

    I'm actually getting annoyed at the targeted ads.

    Recently I was looking at sim only mobile subscriptions, and I have visited and bought a subscription at T-mobile.nl, but since then almost all ads I see are T-mobile ads, with a sparse Vodafone ad in between.

    Yes, AdSense, I get it, very clever, you know that I visited t-mobile, but that does not mean that that's the only ad I want to see! Especially because they are of no use to me, and make me want to grab for the nearest Adblock Plus extension even quicker.
    Especially because they are all animated ads, instead of the previous rather inobtrusive text ads. Why, Google, have you caved in to the advertisers moronic idea that we want to see flashing banners everywhere?

    I guess, it serve me right for using a browser that doesn't have a NoScript extension.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Fin, Feb 19th, 2012 @ 1:28am

    I (^) Target Adverts

    Well perhaps saying i love them is a bit ott.

    What i mean to say is i have no issue with transparently targeted ads.

    After searching for a media centre tower, without too much luck, i popped onto youtube to catch up on the Angry Video Game Nerd. One of the adverts sitting there was for a HTC tower from Maplin, sure enough i ended up going to the store and buying it.

    I am well aware Google uses my searchs to direct the AdCenter and all that has happened is i have been shown an ad for something i actually wanted and the content creator has got some money for unintrusively advertising it on behalf of Maplin.

    Prehaps i will only buy something i see on google ads 1 in 10000 times, but if there relevant and i know why there there and i know its supporting something i enjoy then i'm more likely to consider them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Cyphase (profile), Feb 19th, 2012 @ 3:18am

    "Target"ed Advertising

    Sorry, I had to say it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Deirdre (profile), Feb 19th, 2012 @ 5:14am

    I was trying to figure out why our office was sent a complimentary box of newborn diapers. If they thought anyone was about to give birth they were really off the mark. However we do go to the local Target to buy unscented soap for the washrooms, big bottles of hand sanitizer for the staff and to set out for the clients and big bags of cotton balls that we to clean the office dogs' ears out with.

    One mystery explained. We donated the diapers to a local children's charity.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    gregory lent, Feb 19th, 2012 @ 6:14am

    pie in the sky, if you think an algorithm knows me better than i do.

    itunes genius recommendations is a great example of 95% failure.

    and people have better intuition than marketers think.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    CSI Target, Feb 19th, 2012 @ 5:17pm

    Literal Target

    It appears Target takes its name too literally, and sees its customers as targets. It has long been a very creepy company, and reportedly even has its own sophisticated crime lab.

    This should be an opt-in process where people request data profiling and ad targeting. What a bunch of smug weasels, all proud of themselves for tricking pregnant women by mixing up the ads (wine glasses next to baby clothes...lol...idiots.)

    You absolutely cannot count on them handling private information responsibly. The best thing to do is pay cash as much as possible, and spread around your shopping to various companies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Lord Binky, Feb 20th, 2012 @ 9:59am

    What is there to fear?

    I don't know why this is scary. Maybe because I've done data mining and machine learning algorithms I know that where there isn't a boogey man. I personally want targetted ads. I'd be happy to never see a tampon ad again. I crack up at old spice ads that bust through a tissue commercial while watching tv shows that I would not have figured they had calculated that I am the target demographic for the show.

    If I got an Ad for stool softeners the day after I buy 15 lbs of cheese for a party, I'd be thankful that just in case I ate it all on my own, they wanted to help.

    Really though, if I got Ads for electronics,tools,hobbies, and pet stuff instead of ads for feminine hygine,cars(I don't buy cars every other week, my interest in this is not consistant), huggies, or clothing brands I detest, what is wrong with it?

    tl;dr;
    Let's all run in fear from the savings!AHHH!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    GP, Feb 21st, 2012 @ 12:12am

    I've gotta wonder if Safeway thinks I go away for the winter
    because I only shop there from spring to fall. More to
    do with being less convieinent to get to by bus than bike.
    ^_- Of course they could eliminate that possibility by
    noticing the ramping up of paper product/non-perishable
    food purchases in October, having to go to multiple
    locations to get enough of some things before the snow
    lands. ^_^ I tend to buy out the shelf of some things
    that are bulky and don't get adaquate shelf space in my
    stocking up frenzy, thus looking like this guy on the
    way home:

    http://www.moonie.ca/bike_in_africa.jpg ^_^

    As I read this article I was trying to think of
    coincidental purchase patterns that might make Target
    think a man was pregnant. :-0

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Alex Fatcow, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 9:25am

    less creepy ads

    "perfectly targeted ads actually provide useful information in that it's ads/deals/coupons targeted for exactly what we need, such that we'll actually save money on the key things we want. That's a benefit to consumers"- Exactly! That is the main point we started to make ads more like an art more like something creative instead of making something simple and useful for the target market. I have been writing recently scenario for one ad and there is a couple having romantic dinner and when I showed the brief to my colleague she proposed to put the couples table in the water. Just because it makes surrealistic effect. Itís insane!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Alockswain (profile), Mar 16th, 2012 @ 11:40pm

    Target Coupons

    Target, online at Target.com, is one of the world's leading department store chains that is found throughout thousands of destinations in the US. Target is considered a discount-store and has a wide selection of merchandise.


    target coupons

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This