by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 19th 2010 10:04pm
A couple years ago, we noted that the old claim that "insiders" were the biggest data breach threat was no longer true, as other threats were becoming a much bigger deal. While that study seemed to use very different methodology, a new study is out that agrees that insiders are a much smaller threat, but notes that outside hacking surpassed "human error" as the cause of data breaches in 2009. While it's good that human error issues are decreasing as a percentage, is it worrisome that outside hack attacks are now becoming such a major problem? The good news in the data is that there were supposedly fewer reported attacks in 2009 (by a pretty large amount) compared to 2008 -- so one possible reading of the data is that people have been effective in preventing things like human error breaches much more often, which is what allowed outside hack attacks to take the lead on a percentage basis. However, with recent stories of things like China's hack attack on Google it seems like we'll be hearing more and more stories about these sorts of attacks for one important reason: in many (certainly not all) cases, they can be quite effective.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Australian Secretary Of Defense Not Concerned About Phone Hack; Doesn't Think People Want To Spy On His Phone
- Gemalto: Ok, Yes, We Were Hacked, And Yes Some SIM Cards May Be Compromised, But Not Because Of Us
- Gemalto Takes The Lenovo Approach: Denies Any Real Risk From NSA Hacking Its Encryption Keys
- Google Blasts DOJ's Request For Expanded Search Powers; Calls Proposal A Threat To The Fourth Amendment
- This Week In 'The NSA Knows F**king Everything': How It Hacked Most Hard Drives And SIM Cards