Cool New Platform For Supporting Artists: Patreon, From Jack Conte

from the nicely-done dept

I'm obviously a big fan of crowdfunding platforms like Kickstarter, but I've always argued that it's just one of many models that content creators can use to succeed today. In fact, for a long time, I've felt that the biggest thing that was missing from Kickstarter was any sort of ongoing payment system. It's entirely project based, and thus it's not the best tool for ongoing revenue. For many years I've been interested in ideas for more ongoing revenue streams, and even proposed the idea of "subscribing" to a band's output nearly a decade ago. So it's good to see that some folks are exploring some of these ideas in much more detail.

I met Jack Conte a few years ago, after having written about him and his band Pomplamoose a few times. I'd always been impressed by Pomplamoose's ability to really connect with their fans and to build a way to support themselves via that strong connection. But in my brief interactions with Jack, it quickly became clear that he thinks deeply about different ideas for revenue models, and so it's little surprise that he's now built what seems like a pretty cool platform for ongoing support for content creators. It's basically a platform, like Kickstarter, but rather than backing a project, you back the production of certain types of regular content. So, for example, you could promise that you'll pay $5 every time Jack releases a new video (and you can put limits on how much you pay, so he doesn't get away with suddenly releasing 1,000 videos at once). It's called Patreon, and it's got a nice, simple video explaining how it works:
I'm sure some will argue that this is just a "paywall," but it's actually the opposite of that. People aren't paying you to get access to the content. The content will be available elsewhere (often for free). They're paying to support your continued production (i.e., supporting future production, rather than paying to access past productions) and they can get extra benefits (added value) as supporters, such as Google Hangouts with the creators. Some of this is quite like a few of the popular subscription options in our Techdirt Insider Shop, though rather than monthly, the amounts are triggered per creation (I'm not sure that would work for a blog like ours that produces a bunch of content every day, but I could see how it would be quite cool for less frequent types of creative endeavors).

Either way, I'm glad to see some new platforms popping up like this. For a little while, it had been getting kind of annoying to see just how many Kickstarter clones were popping up (including a new one from Donald Trump?!?). You never know, of course, if Patreon will catch on, but conceptually the model makes a lot of sense for many types of content creators. In some ways, it seems like a better model for connecting with "true fans" than something like a Kickstarter. While Kickstarter has the appeal of "this is a big event, join us!" it would be nice to see some more ongoing, sustainable model platforms become popular as well.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Karl (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 12:07am

    Nice

    While I have some minor doubts about the success of this platform in the long-term (mostly for reasons having nothing to do with the platform itself), it's excellent to see more of these business models actually making it to the marketplace.

    Every single attempt is a benefit to artists, even if (God forbid) the attempt is unsuccessful. The worst that will happen is that it will lead to attempts that succeed. The best that will happen is that it will succeed, artists will have a platform that actually benefits them directly, and the public will benefit from artists' successes without having to sacrifice any of their freedoms.

    Whether this particular platform succeeds or fails, it's a win-win proposition for everyone, artists and the public alike.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Charles Brown, May 23rd, 2013 @ 12:11am

    Bring it on!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    horse with no name, May 23rd, 2013 @ 12:30am

    paywall

    I'm sure some will argue that this is just a "paywall," but it's actually the opposite of that.

    It reads more like a failwall to me. It seems to be going against the basic grain, once again hoping a few people will pay to entertain the masses. This one is a little worse, because it appears that those who do pay will be nothing more than those who don't pay and just pick the content up online for free.

    It's nice to see someone trying to tackle the issues at hand, but I think perhaps Jack Conte confuses his personal success with one that can be rolled out and essentially franchised. He does well personally because he has the secret sauce ingredient in her personality that allows him to connect with people in ways most never can. That is what makes his things work. I don't know if that ability can be translated into this sort of system. It really requires people to get past certain boundaries to really personally like an artist and basically to pay for others to enjoy them. That is a hard sell.

    My feeling is that this will be a short term success (as all the anti-label types around sites like Techdirt) clamber to be patrons, but over time, donor fatigue sets in and the process slowly dies off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 23rd, 2013 @ 2:05am

      Re: paywall

      [b he has the secret sauce ingredient in her [/b]

      Perhaps the project will grow and have a life of its own, and in time be the origin of a hole line of creative offspring

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 23rd, 2013 @ 4:28am

      Re: paywall

      "It reads more like a failwall..."

      It's spelled fail whale.

      Dude. Pay attention.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Lurk-a-lot (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 4:44am

      Re: paywall

      Actually, I first heard of patreon via a youtube subscription - get that? An artist that was already producing video content for free that was also asking his subscribers if they wanted to support his efforts.

      So:
      1. Not a paywall.
      2. I personally already like his content.

      ... which makes you wrong on all of your points.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        horse with no name, May 23rd, 2013 @ 5:47am

        Re: Re: paywall

        How can charging people to see certain things not be a paywall? You still have to pay to see at least some of the content (the good stuff).

        That is a paywall.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          David Muir (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 5:53am

          Re: Re: Re: paywall

          It is not a paywall. It is a crowdpatron system. In the very old days, under patronage, one rich dude would pay an artist to produce works for him. With the Internet, individuals can pay a small amount to support their favorite artist, but add many individuals together and you potentially have an artist making a decent living via ongoing payment for production.

          This is better than the current regime in several ways. Most importantly it funds FUTURE work of an ARTIST's own creation, and does not extort money out of people for the PAST work of OTHERS.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Nov 10th, 2013 @ 10:57pm

          Re: Re: Re: paywall

          horse with no name just hates it when intelligence is enforced.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Zakida Paul (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 1:21am

    I am unsure about this. A 'subscription' model for crowd funding 'ongoing production' doesn't sound like the kind of thing I would be interested in. I would much prefer to look at each project on merit and then decide if it is something I want to contribute to and how much I want to contribute.

    PledgeMusic works just fine for that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Crosbie Fitch (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 2:11am

    Necessity is the mother of invention

    I've been working in this area for some time: http://digitalproductions.co.uk/index.php?id=233

    It's amazing how these simple, but radical revenue mechanisms aren't believed as necessary until they are implemented, used, and successful. Only then are they eventually recognised as indispensable, and in hindsight people wonder "Why weren't these things in existence much sooner?"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      horse with no name, May 23rd, 2013 @ 3:02am

      Re: Necessity is the mother of invention

      You mean like the segway?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 23rd, 2013 @ 4:46am

        Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention

        Segways are not indispensable nor necessary, they are a nice gimmick and a good example of gyro stabilisation but not useful. Try again.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          horse with no name, May 23rd, 2013 @ 5:48am

          Re: Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention

          So setting up a paywall to charge people to watch digital videos is indispensable and necessary? I guess it's right up there with food and water, right?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          David Muir (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 5:59am

          Re: Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention

          Airport police are using Segways. They find them better than bikes or carts or motor scooters. But sure, not as indispensable or necessary as food and water.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, May 23rd, 2013 @ 5:53am

    Yup, the "new business model" is free money!

    Mike sez: "I'm obviously a big fan of crowdfunding platforms like Kickstarter," and it's off-the-top FIVE PERCENT TAKE. That's the kind of idea Mike likes: LOTS OF MONEY for almost no effort.

    Look guys, most music and movies are made with expectation of getting money, and copyright is simply common law recognition of who made it and attempt to see that those persons and no others get the rewards. Copyright IS crowfunding. You wouldn't need Kickstarter in the absence of commercialized piracy such as Megaupload! "File hosts" break the connection between fans and creators, besides break the law in getting money from works they didn't produce.

    And now supposed "patronage", eh? This is even less likely to work because breaks the direct connection between product and paying: eventually patrons are going to wonder why they're paying. -- You can't compete with free when it's your own product! If you encourage free distribution without some moral hook then most people will take it for free. You might as well just stick to traditional copyright that's been proven for over a hundred years.


    "a blog like ours that produces a bunch of content every day," -- HA! Talk about self-aggrandizing! You re-write from what others did last week! That's EASY. -- Just try offering some real world solutions rather than gushing over the latest scam or your endless complaints.



    Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
    http://techdirt.com/
    Mike may sell a few T-shirts with Techdirt logo, but I bet his lunch dates are open.
    01:51:30[b-602-3]

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    harknell (profile), May 23rd, 2013 @ 6:25am

    Already Long Established By Pete Abrams

    Pete Abrams, the creator of the webcomic "Sluggy Freelance" has had a system in place for a very long time called "The Defenders of the Nifty", which is essentially a subscription system to help him continue to make the comic. While he does have some special extras for these people, and gives them some info in advance, they primarily just want to support his work. If you have a strong enough fanbase this can work well--part of that "1000 True Fans" idea that came out a few years ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The Real Michael, May 23rd, 2013 @ 7:44am

    I'm not convinced. It's like turning music business into a charity social club. It makes the people using it seem desperate, whereas something like Kickstarter is just "This is my project, you contribute X amount and get Y content." Done.

    It's not a bad idea but I seriously doubt it will take off.

    (BTW, Techdirt keeps freezing at random intervals. The heck is going on?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    iisjreg, Jan 9th, 2014 @ 10:21am

    I'll just leave this here: https://www.shutupandsitdown.com/donate/season/beta-pledge-season-013/

    People are willing to contribute to artists' ongoing work. It doesn't matter if you don't like it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Daniel, Jan 27th, 2014 @ 8:18pm

    Not a paywall.

    Except when it is.

    Brian Brushwood and Tom Merritt did an awesome show on the TWiT Network called Frame Rate about cord cutting, IE ditching your pay TV (Cable, DBS, Etc.) provider in favor of internet TV and OTA antenna. TWiT is an ad supported network and all was well.

    Tom Merritt had some sort of contract dispute and left the network, so now the show is freelance and called Cordkillers.

    Again all was well via Patreon funding until tonight when I was watching the live stream and Brian said that they were shutting down the stream to record some exclusive stuff for the patrons.

    Exclusive stuff for people who paid is a paywall. I would gladly support them if I could afford it, but can't so obviously as one of the excluded I am a bit miffed about the whole thing. I will still watch whatever is freely available.

    Oh and if Brian reads this, say hi to Mr. Happy Pants for me <>.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ken D. Webber, Mar 7th, 2014 @ 10:28pm

    paywall?

    Calling it a paywall isn't exactly the case because there are also physical rewards (posters, t-shirts, signed product) an artist can offer so it's not like you're only paying to watch or read something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This