from the best-practices dept
This post should also be considered sponsored by ASUS Windows Slate, in partnership with Microsoft and SAYMedia.
by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 24th 2011 3:56pm
by Mike Masnick
Mon, Mar 14th 2011 9:05pm
From HP:Notice no legal threats. No claims of intellectual property violations. Some might claim this is a "non-story," but in an age when the default so often seems to break out the lawyers, cease-and-desists and threats (if not outright lawsuits), it's nice to see a response like this. In some ways it's more of a story, since it seems so rare.
"It's a fast innovation cycle and a fast imitation cycle in this market, so we just know that we have the creative engine here to continue to build on what we have, and we'll keep innovating, we'll keep honing and those guys hopefully will continue to see the value in it and keep following us by about a year."
RIM (Blackberry) responds.
"Well, when you’re trying to optimize user experience that juggles multitasking, multiple apps open at once and on a small screen, you’re going to get people landing on similar kinds of designs."
by Mike Masnick
Tue, Dec 28th 2010 10:28am
by Mike Masnick
Mon, Nov 22nd 2010 9:23pm
by Mike Masnick
Thu, Feb 18th 2010 6:19am
by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 26th 2010 12:48pm
At the end of a failed 15-year experiment in giving away its product, the press (newspapers and magazines) has begun to renounce free. It's slow in starting, because of the inertia of this decade and a half, but the New York Times announced recently that it would begin charging for its Website, and others are sure to follow.... But payment for Websites alone won't be enough to change newspapers' and magazines' bottom lines from red to black. Apple's tablet, however, will.Bold claims. Let's see if they can be backed up.
It's time for free to end. Newspapers and magazines made the mistake, in the early days of the Web, of giving away their content for free, in exchange for revenue from Web advertising.Wait, there are tons of companies that are making a ton of money off of ad supported content. Why is it time for that to end? Free was never the mistake of the publishing business. It was a combination of factors, such as not recognizing that they had much more competition than in the past, and they couldn't just sit back and ignore it, but had to build out real web presences that offered more value to their communities. But few did that. And, with newspapers in particular, the bigger problem wasn't "free," but the fact that many of them took on staggering amounts of debt that they couldn't repay. That's got nothing to do with free.
In the past few years, tens of thousands of jobs have been lost, and newspapers and magazines are cutting back and folding all across the U.S.... Yet we need the press: the fourth estate is a necessary check for our government and business. As long as free thrives, the press can't do its job correctly. Free may be good for freeloaders, but it's bad for society. Those who want things to be free forget that there are still people doing the work they get for nothing, and those people need to be paid. As the old saw goes, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch.Oh goodness. Where to start. Just about everything above is wrong, misleading or simply ignorant of what's happening, what critics are saying and basic economics. First, yes, there are many fewer jobs in traditional journalism, but that's not due to "free," but due to a changing marketplace. That happens. Lots of people used to be employed making horse carriages. Not any more. Lots of people used to be telephone operators, connecting callers from one to another, but then the technology made it so that wasn't necessary any more. But telephony was better off because of it. Maybe we don't need all those journalists in traditional roles, but who says journalism will be worse off for it? We're seeing lots of interesting new business models developing, and many new sources of journalism.
What news agencies can't do is the added-value reporting, the analysis, opinion and in-depth reporting that we want to read to better understand, and that we need for society to thrive. It may be a coincidence, but in recent years, investigative journalism was severely lacking at a time when it was needed the most. Only when people pay for news can we have quality reporting.Huh? Again, people have never paid for news. Arguing otherwise is pure ignorance. Also, there is more analysis, opinion and in-depth reporting going on now than ever before in history -- it's just that much of it no longer comes from traditional journalists.
To those who protest that "no one will pay for a newspaper on the Web", consider some very successful experiments in paid online content. The Wall Street Journal charges around $100 a year for full access to its Website, and plenty of businesspeople pay for this. This is because the Journal provides the kind of news that is not plentiful; people pay for the quality of the business news and analysis that they can't find elsewhere, as well as its timeliness.Yes, people love to show the WSJ example, but the WSJ's paywall has become increasingly "leaky" as its subscriber growth has slowed. Convincing new people to sign up when they're getting plenty of free content elsewhere? Not so easy. It's easy to call the WSJ a success today, but the likelihood that it remains that way over time? Small.
I'm betting that Apple will get it right, as far as features, interface and usability are concerned. It will also be an excellent tool for reading the news. Newspapers and magazines will be able to package their content in multimedia bundles (either as apps or something similar to the iTunes LP) that will be designed for reading on a portable screen; this won't simply be web pages viewed on a smaller screen.So that's it then? Because Apple designs a nice product people will suddenly buy? Okay. Would be great if it happens, but I doubt it will. If newspapers do lock themselves up behind a paywall or only offer paid versions on these tablets, people will just go elsewhere -- really quickly. And for those smart publications that understand this, every new paywall becomes an opportunity to build an even larger (free) audience, which will help support all kinds of business models that don't involve direct payments. I don't doubt that some people would pay for the convenience of subbing to newspapers or magazines on a tablet, but it's difficult to look at the details and see how it ever becomes a significant part of the market in any way. You simply won't get enough buyers for it to make a difference.
The key to hardware being successful is the software that supports it. One of the main advantages to Apple's tablet, as far as the press is concerned, is the iTunes Store. Since Apple already has this platform to sell and deliver that content, even on a subscription basis, readers will be able to easily buy their favorite newspapers and magazines and get them delivered instantly. They'll be cheaper than the print versions, and they'll be a lot greener too. And the iTunes Store will be able to provide a better selection than readers can find by going to individual Websites. Whether by subscription or by single issue, it'll be extremely simple to buy newspapers and magazines to read on the Apple tablet.
Explore some core concepts:
|15:33||Countries Sign The TPP... Whatever Happened To The 'Debate' We Were Promised Before Signing? (62)|
|14:07||Take-Two Software Sued Over Copyright On NBA Players' Tattoos (35)|
|12:48||Comcast 'Only' Lost 36,000 Pay TV Subscribers Last Year, Prompting Renewed Cord Cutting Denial (18)|
|11:36||Former DHS Boss Puts University Of California Employees Under Secret Surveillance (38)|
|10:31||Publicity Rights For A Photobombing Horse? Owner Demands Cut Of Photo Prize (49)|
|10:29||Daily Deal: Python Programming Bootcamp (0)|
|09:33||Ares Rights Gets EFF Lawyer Suspended From Twitter For Posting Mild Criticism (22)|
|08:29||Utah Politician Looking To Tackle Doxing, DoS Attacks And Swatting With New Slate Of Cybercrime Amendments (16)|
|06:19||ISPs Are Trampling Net Neutrality While The FCC Sits Boxed In By Lawsuits, Upcoming Election (40)|
|03:20||Federal Judge Says The FBI Needs To Stop Playing Keepaway With Requested FOIA Processing Documents (23)|
|23:23||The Incredible Corporate Sovereignty Saga Involving Ecuador And Chevron Continues (32)|
|17:00||DailyDirt: Nature Vs. CRISPR (6)|
|15:33||Hasbro Sued For Font Piracy On My Little Pony Merchandise (51)|
|14:05||Time Warner Eyes Hulu Stake, Wants Service To Remove Current Seasons Of Shows (40)|
|12:45||Techdirt Podcast Episode 59: Does The Internet Create More 'Winner Take All' Companies? (5)|
|11:44||EU And US Come To 'Agreement' On Safe Harbor, But If It Doesn't Stop Mass Surveillance, It Won't Fly (11)|
|10:38||Fine Brothers History Of Overaggressive Behavior Doomed Their Plan; But Hopefully Others Will Revive The Good Parts (34)|
|10:33||Daily Deal: OSTraining Developer Courses (0)|
|09:33||The NSA Lost In Court, So This DMCA Notice Is Totally Valid (10)|
|08:28||How Lobbyists Turned Big US Education Reform Bill Into The 'No Copyright Propaganda Left Behind' Act (28)|
|06:22||The Cable Industry Is Absolutely Terrified Of Set Top Box Competition (58)|
|03:24||Congressional Rep Who Introduced Anti-Swatting Bill... Victim Of Attempted Swatting (65)|
|23:23||Beyond Open Access And Open Data: Open Science -- And No Patents (14)|
|17:00||DailyDirt: Making Spirits Bright (6)|
|15:35||Eight Years Ago, The Iowa Caucus Convinced Me Of The Power Of Twitter... Today? Not So Much (13)|
|14:05||India Set To Ban Zero Rating As Facebook's Misleading Lobbying Falls Flat (16)|
|12:45||Hillary Clinton Flip Flopped On TPP Before, So Big Business Lobbyists Are Confident She'll Really Flip Back After Election (24)|
|11:41||The Fine Bros Plan Is Actually Pretty Cool If You Get Past How They Announced It (100)|
|10:40||DOJ Lies To 'FOIA Terrorist' Jason Leopold; Claim They Have No Documents On Aaron Swartz (36)|
|10:35||Daily Deal: Glasswire Pro For PC (0)|