Independent Musician Sues Justin Bieber & Skrillex For Copyright Infringement... Over A Sample They Didn't Use
from the well-that's-an-issue dept
Here's White Hinterland's "Ring the Bell":
Creating original and unique music is my lifeâ€™s passion, but it is challenging and time consuming. I poured my blood, sweat, and tears into writing and producing â€śRing the Bell,â€ť and I am proud of the finished product, which Rolling Stone listed as one of its â€śfavorite songs, albums, and videos.â€ť Throughout my career, I have worked very hard to preserve my independence and creative control, thus it came as a shock to hear my work used and exploited without permission.To be fair, the vocal riffs are pretty similar, but they're also pretty short and pretty basic. Just a short upward progression.
Like most artists that sample music, Bieber could have licensed my song for use in â€śSorry.â€ť But he chose not to contact me. After the release of â€śSorry,â€ť my lawyers sent Bieber a letter regarding the infringement, but Bieberâ€™s team again chose to ignore me. I offered Bieberâ€™s team an opportunity to have a private dialogue about the infringement, but they refused to even acknowledge my claim, despite the obviousness of the sample. Justin Bieber is the worldâ€™s biggest artist, and Iâ€™m sure that he and his team will launch a full attack against me. But, in the end, I was left with no other option. I believe I have an obligation to stand up for my music and art.
As for the lawsuit itself... it bends over backwards to present circumstantial evidence of why Skrillex may have heard Dienel's song, noting things like the fact that her album was reviewed in Rolling Stone in an issue that also reviewed a Skrillex album. And also, a previous producer for a different Bieber album was also in another musical group that was signed to a sister label with the label that put out the White Hinterlands album. And even though the rest of both of the songs are really different, Dienel's lawsuit still tries to insist that there are more similarities than there really are:
Both â€śRing the Bellâ€ť and the infringing â€śSorryâ€ť feature keyboard synthesizers, samples, synth bass, drums, and percussion. Although â€śSorryâ€ť does not include horns like â€śRing the Bell,â€ť â€śSorryâ€ť uses a synthesizer patch to resemble a trumpet.I don't mean to pile on Dienel here. That vocal riff does sound similar, and I can certainly understand why she would feel like this was unfair and potentially illegal. They apparently even got a musicologist to sign off on a claim that the works are the same. The filing does have one "out" in that it sometimes says that the riffs are "identical and/or strikingly similar." So perhaps they can try to keep the case alive by arguing that even if Skrillex didn't sample directly from the White Hinterland song, they used it as the basis of their recreation. That seems like a long shot, if the idea/expression dichotomy has any real weight, but when it comes to "strikingly similar" songs, copyright law sometimes goes... wacky.
Both â€śRing the Bellâ€ť and the infringing â€śSorryâ€ť feature breath-like sounds to complement the vocal riff.