Problems With ThirdVoice

from the some-people-are-so-picky dept

Apparently, not everyone thinks ThirdVoice is a very cool technology. It seems that people are upset that others can more or less "write" on their web page. I think they may have a reasonable argument, though not necessarily a legal one.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Jon Acheson, 11 Jun 1999 @ 3:46pm

    I see 2 big problems for T.V.

    Firstly, what happens when you annotate EVERYTHING on a site? If the annotations on your site bother you, could you simply drown them out by cluttering the whole site up with annotations? It would be a "tragedy of the commons" type situation, because if TV tried to remove only some of the comments, they would be exercising editorial control over the content, and then they WOULD be liable (well, might be liable).

    Secondly, couldn't you argue that this is a violation of copyright, akin to people building sites that are nothing but frames displaying other sites' content? There was a lawsuit over that, and IIRC, the people doing the bogus linking lost. Basically, the argument would be that this service is piggybacking on the content of the annotated sites to the point where it is unreasonable. "Unreasonable" is a term you'd have to prove in court, but it's a starting point.

    Jon Acheson

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.