Senator Kennedy Continues To Push My Buttons With His Ridiculously Dumb 'Don't Push My Buttons' Act

from the that's-not-how-any-of-this-works dept

Last fall, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana (a supposedly smart Senator who seems to have decided his political future lies in acting dumber than 95% of all other Senators) introduced an anti-Section 230 bill. He's now done so again in the new Congressional session. The bill is, once again, called the "Don't Push My Buttons" Act and introducing such a piece of total garbage legislation a second time does not speak well of Senator Kennedy.

The bill is pretty short. It would create an exception to Section 230 for any website that... uses algorithms to rank content for you based on user data it collects. Basically, it's taking a roundabout way to try to remove Section 230 from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. It is not clear why algorithmic ranking has anything to do with Section 230. While social media sites do tend to rely on both, they are separate things. Indeed, part of the reason why social media sites rely on algorithms is because Section 230 helps make sure they can host so much user-generated content, that there needs to be algorithmic rankings to make those sites useable.

So, in practice, if this became law, all it would really serve to do is to make social media sites totally unusable. Either, websites would have to stop doing algorithmic ranking of content (which would make the sites unusable for many people) or they'd start massively moderating content to avoid liability -- making sites nearly unusable.

And, of course, there's an exemption to this exemption which makes the whole thing useless. The bill will allow algorithms... if the user "knowingly and intentionally elects to receive the content." So, all that will happen is every social media service will show you total garbage with a pop up saying "hey, we can straighten this out for you via our algorithm if you just click here" and everyone will click that button.

And that's not even getting into the constitutional problems with this bill. It's literally punishing companies for their editorial (ranking) choices. That's Congress regulating expression. I don't see how this bill would possibly survive 1st Amendment scrutiny. But, of course, it's not designed to survive any scrutiny at all. It's to serve as ever more grandstanding for Senator Kennedy to pretend to be looking out for a base he knows is ignorant beyond belief -- and rather than educating them, he's playing down to them.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: algorithms, content moderation, john kennedy, push my buttons act, ranking, section 230


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2021 @ 9:14pm

    Because, as everyone knows, algorithms are the square root of all evil, right?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 28 Jul 2021 @ 9:21pm

    So sad

    The Kennedy's have fallen into the shitter, and aren't coming out.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2021 @ 10:27pm

    Everything is an algorithm but I'll be honest - I much prefer reverse chronological over the rage-bait-and-stressful-current-events-I'm-not-interested-in shlock the curation algorithms want to show me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 29 Jul 2021 @ 1:22am

    Does he not understand that without the algorithm driving people further down the rabbit hole people might escape from becoming Q faithful?

    It sure is nice that there isn't a pandemic running wild in the nation, that everyone had clean water & safe food, that roads aren't on the verge of pancaking, so that this fucknugget can waste time & energy on this performance art meant to keep the faithful worshiping at the altar of lies.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2021 @ 5:07am

      Re:

      He understands this has a 0% chance of passing so he can safely suggest it while not actually risking Facebook no longer being a place right wingers can lie and grift.

      I'm sure Ben Shapiro has explained how crucial FB is to his bullshit. They probably meet behind closed doors and laugh and laugh about how amazing it is they've convinced people the guy with the Harvard JD and the guy with the Vanderbilt JD are common men standing up against coastal elites.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Bloof (profile), 29 Jul 2021 @ 2:51am

    This is what you get when you elect people based on whether or not they'll attack the things Fox News told you to be mad about. They won't ever propose things that will help you, but you'll sure get a lot of pointless, doomed legislation they can go on Fox and Newsmax to crow about.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2021 @ 4:39am

    This is a frontal, over-the-trenches assault on Section 230

    Either, websites would have to stop doing algorithmic ranking of content (which would make the sites unusable for many people)...

    That's not how algorithms work. You're thinking to narrowly.

    • "by relevancy" is an algorithm
    • "by date" (including both "most recent" and "oldest first") is an algorithm
    • "random" is an algorithm
    • "the first one we run across in the database" is an algorithm
    • "moderated" (i.e. "have a human decide") is an algorithm

    ...an algorithm is a finite sequence of well-defined, computer-implementable instructions...

    -- Wikipedia

    The only way to escape having a ranking algorithm is to avoid ranking altogether by only ever having one item.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Glenn, 29 Jul 2021 @ 5:27pm

    Kennedy: "The world doesn't agree with me, so I want to make it all go away."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2021 @ 6:53pm

    He might be dumb, but he's got NAME RECOGNITION!

    When the wise voters of Louisiana saw his name on the ballot, they said "Hallelujah! He's been resurrected from the dead. He's got my vote."

    Of course, his paymasters don't care that he's an empty suit.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Taruhan Liga, 30 Jul 2021 @ 1:27am

    Berita Terbaru dan Terupdate

    Silakan Kunjungi link ini www.instagram.com/beritaberedar/

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Darkness Of Course (profile), 30 Jul 2021 @ 1:46am

    I know of this Senator Kennedy

    and his constituents. You are wrong about their relationship. He is playing up to them.

    His intelligence is breaching the negative zone, which we once considered impossible. The Former Goon has proven the negative, as it were.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2021 @ 9:35am

    It should have been named the "Don't use my buttons" act. At least then the acronym would be accurate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    GiveMeThePrimaryInfringer (profile), 22 Aug 2021 @ 6:24am

    Yes, stop doing algorithmic ranking, especially 'microtargeting'

    "if this became law, all it would really serve to do is to make social media sites totally unusable. Either, websites would have to stop doing algorithmic ranking of content (which would make the sites unusable for many people) or they'd start massively moderating content to avoid liability -- making sites nearly unusable. "

    I liked social media better when it was a chronological list of postings by my friends instead of amplifying 'microtargeted' clickbait and ads. Can we go back to the old system, or is sorting by 'time' an algorithm now?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Sponsored Promotion
Public Money, Public Code - Sign The Open Letter at publiccode.eu
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.