'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die

from the repetition-forges-reality dept

Since the very beginning of the net neutrality debate, ISPs have repeatedly (and falsely) proclaimed that net neutrality rules (read: stopgap rules crafted in the absence of competition to stop giant monopolies from abusing their power) utterly demolished broadband sector investment. It was a primary talking point during the battle over the flimsy 2010 rules, utilized extensively during the 2015 passage of slightly tougher rules, and was foundational in the Trump FCC's arguments justifying their hugely unpopular and fraud prone repeal of those rules.

Time after time after time, big ISPs (and the politicians and regulators paid to love them) lied and claimed that the modest rules (by international standards) had crushed sector investment. Then, when the rules were repealed, they again lied that this had triggered a massive new investment wave. Never mind that countless different studies showed the rules had no impact on investment. If that wasn't enough, it was repeatedly confirmed by ISP earnings reports, and the public statements of numerous CEOs that this claim was never true.

It's a lie, the folks pushing it know it's a lie, but they just keep repeating it so it's cemented as gospel among the alternative facts set.

With net neutrality potentially getting restored at the Biden FCC (assuming they can get around to appointing a new Democratic Commissioner), the lie is being trotted out again by Trump's last-minute FCC appointment, Nathan Simington. Speaking over at the Free State Foundation on Wednesday, Simington once again trotted out the old, reliable bogeyman:

"...my biggest worry about Title II is really that, after a few years of chilling effects on infrastructure construction, we will find ourselves in an entirely avoidable and artificial broadband infrastructure crisis."

So one, we're already in a crisis now caused by decades of shitty state and federal leadership and monopolization. The previous FCC gutted most FCC consumer protection authority right before a pandemic, leaving it unable to adequately police everything from privacy violations to billing fraud. And it turned a blind eye as the telecom industry used bogus statistics (and even fake or dead people to provide bogus support for it). It also literally did absolutely nothing to meaningfully address the stranglehold regional monopolies like AT&T and Comcast have over the market.

If Simington was really concerned about the idea that reclassifying ISPs as common carriers under Title II harmed infrastructure investment, there's just an ocean of data disproving the claim that should have put his mind at ease. The same day Simington was giving his speech, consumer groups like Free Press were testifying before Congress, using reams of research data showing this lie isn't true. In fact, several of the ISPs that were given tens of billions in tax breaks and subsidies during the Trump era for literally doing nothing trimmed overall investment:

"In fact, investment declined every year of Chairman Pai’s tenure. AT&T investment dropped 20 percent in 2020, and 52 percent from its peak in the last year for the Obama FCC. Comcast’s dropped 4 and half percent last year, down 22 percent from 2016. But even if deregulation alone had increased deployment — and it didn’t — buildout alone would not lower price or increase adoption in the absence of competition, oversight, and more robust adoption subsidies."

Again, this isn't a "he said, she said" scenario. SEC filings, earnings reports, CEO statements, and numerous studies all show net neutrality rules (which again had the overwhelming bipartisan majority of public support) neither harmed, nor spurred, meaningful broadband investment. As somebody that has covered this sector for twenty years, I assure you the lack of broadband investment in the United States has two primary causes: rampant state and federal corruption (regulatory capture), and monopolization.

Obvious problems folks like Simington (much like freshly-departed FCC boss Ajit Pai) either downplay or refuse to acknowledge whatsoever.

Most of these folks know they're parroting a lie, but they continue to do it anyway because in the US media environment, it continues to work. Bloomberg, for example, was quick to write an entire story parroting the falsehood, even going so far as to repeat the lie, unchallenged, in a headline. So as the latest net neutrality debate heats up once again, don't expect the press, or many of the folks who think "let Comcast do whatever it wants" is real policy, to meaningfully change their stripes.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fcc, infrastructure, infrastructure investment, nathan simington, net neutrality, regulations


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Bloof (profile), 22 Feb 2021 @ 5:10am

    You mean they haven't switched to claiming section 230 hampers infrastructure upgrades yet? I'm disappointed in you, republicans.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 22 Feb 2021 @ 5:16am

      Give them time; they haven’t gotten the new corporate dictates yet.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Feb 2021 @ 4:49am

        Re:

        Oh, they have gotten them alright. Those dictates just included a time delay. Can't have the public enraged any further after the coup, after all. I'd say wait until around mid-summer. Once the chaos from the pandemic dies down and people accept their new found poverty, the corporate oppression will resume in earnest.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Feb 2021 @ 9:38am

    the assholes who keep spewing this rubbish do it because of fear the truth will come out, that NONE of the companies increased investment, in fact, after claiming gazillions in public funding, cut investment and thousands of jobs AFTER net neutrality was squashed by Pai! these are the same fuckers who want to kill Sec 230 because they know the good it does to everyone who uses the Internet but, yet again, the big companies want in squashed and are paying them to get rid of it! once again, ASSHOLES!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Feb 2021 @ 10:21am

    Hypocrites ... these same folk who want to destroy neutrality on the internet have been demanding neutrality of the content seen on the internet. Seems they can not make up their minds about whether things should be neutral.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    K`Tetch (profile), 22 Feb 2021 @ 12:54pm

    Nathan Simington just shows that hes not capable of being trusted to power cycle his own modem when his connection is being troubleshooted (not without asking if he should put the power cable up his nose), let alone being an FCC commissioner.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dave, 22 Feb 2021 @ 2:43pm

    Hey, you might say this was Metallica's…

    Own goal. 😁😋

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 22 Feb 2021 @ 3:12pm

    Way to justify your worth there 'traditional journalism'

    'Social media companies have the audacity to create and enforce terms of service, they need to be reigned in for the public good! Also we have to make sure not to burden the poor ISP's with any regulations, as everyone knows those are incredibly damaging to the free market that we cherish so much!'

    Nothing like hypocrisy and open dishonesty to really show a person's true colors. I'd accuse them of being lazy as well and repeating the same lies as always but since it keeps working I suppose I can't blame them for that as why bother coming up with new material when the old stuff works just fine?

    The politicians likely know but don't care that they're being lied to so long as the 'donations' keep coming in, and the 'news' companies will continue to happily parrot whatever they'd told like the tamed stooges that they've become leaving the public either unknowingly falling for those lies or stuck with a representative that doesn't care.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), 23 Feb 2021 @ 4:48pm

    I pretty much thought the 2013 fuck you...you can oligobble our balls situation was the reason infrastructure investment and development has failed.

    I expect the southern half of the US to become a massive desert before that changes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.