Court Says Trump Appointee Had No Authority To Fire Open Technology Fund Board; Says They Remain In Place

from the good-news dept

Back in July, we wrote about how Trump had appointed a Steve Bannon mentee, Michael Pack, to head the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the organization that oversees a bunch of independent media organizations, including the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, and Middle East Broadcasting. The plan was to turn them into a state-sponsored Breitbart. That process has begun, including the recent attempt to investigate Voice of America journalists for impure thoughts about Dear Leader.

But, perhaps much more troubling to us was the desire to completely revamp the Open Technology Fund. OTF is connected to USAGM mostly for legacy reasons. It was originally spun up as a project by Radio Free Asia to help fund open source anti-censorship tools for activists around the world. The work it does and funds is incredibly important to free speech around the globe -- and for unclear reasons, Pack, Bannon and friends had wanted to completely change that, taking funding away from open source projects, and dumping it into some extremely dubious closed source projects.

Soon after Pack joined USAGM he told the head of OTF she was fired, and then fired the entire OTF Board as well when they protested, and said he was appointing a brand new board and CEO. This resulted in lawsuits and even Republican Senators asking what the fuck Pack thought he was doing.

In true Trumpian fashion, Pack simply ignored Congress, and even ignored a subpoena from House Representatives to answer questions about what he's done with USAGM. As if to poke a stick in the eye of Congress, at the very moment he was supposed to be appearing before Congress in response to a subpoena, Pack instead was opening up an RFP asking for new vendors to take over the role of OTF in building censorship circumvention tools.

A few days later, a bunch of top USAGM employees, including its Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Executive Director, Deputy Director for Operations, and Director of Management services filed a whistleblower complaint with the State Department, after they were all put on administrative leave for raising concerns about how Pack was creating real harm in destroying the ability for the various USAGM organizations to do their job. For example, one of the whistleblowers was specifically concerned about the OTF defunding, and how it would harm protesters in Hong Kong:

n. Mr. Powers raised urgent concerns regarding the impact that Mr. Pack’s spending freeze was having on USAGM’s ability to support internet freedom tools in Hong Kong amidst the ongoing Chinese crackdown and takeover of local governing authorities. Mr. Powers specifically pointed out that the spending freeze was placing USAGM’s journalists at grave risk, and that the funds needed to be released to ensure that both USAGM’s journalists and its audience were safe from surveillance and persecution. Mr. Pack’s failure to support the internet freedom tools created a specific physical danger to USAGM journalists.

For that, Pack effectively fired him.

However, there is finally at least a glimmer of good news in all of this. A few days ago, the court hearing the case about whether or not Pack could fire the entire OTF Board and its CEO and replace it with his cronies ruled that no, he absolutely cannot do that. Indeed, it's right in OTF's bylaws that only the Board itself can fire executives or replace Board Members:

Neither OTF’s bylaws nor the International Broadcasting Act (“IBA”), as incorporated by reference in the bylaws, provides the USAGM CEO with the removal and replacement authority Pack claims.

OTF’s bylaws presume that the Board of Directors is responsible for both election and removal of directors. The bylaws state, “Individuals shall be elected by the Board of Directors for three-year terms upon majority vote of the Board of Directors, or as may be authorized by 22 U.S.C. 6203 et seq….He or she shall hold office until the expiration of his or her term and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or his or her earlier resignation or removal or as may be authorized by 22 U.S.C. 6203 et seq.”

OTF bylaws also grant authority to the Board of Directors to fill vacant positions on the Board: “Any vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors due to removal or resignation may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining Directors. The Director so elected shall hold office for the remainder of his or her predecessor’s term or until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.”

And then the court notes that the Board of Directors did not agree to fire themselves and did not agree to appoint the new board:

The Board of Directors did not hold a vote to elect any of the new directors that Pack attempted to appoint...

Section 6.12 of OTF’s bylaws contains the only clear mechanism for removal of directors: “Any Director may be removed from office for cause by the vote of two-thirds (2/3) of those Directors present at a meeting of the Board of Directors at which a quorum is present, provided that all Directors, including the Director to be removed are provided no less than ten (10) days’ notice of such meeting.”...

The Board of Directors did not hold a vote to remove any of the directors that Pack attempted to remove.

No other provisions within OTF’s bylaws modify this removal authority.

The court further notes just how incredibly damaging Pack's weird attempted coup of OTF has been:

Pack’s purported removal and replacement of the OTF’s original Board of Directors has left OTF without clear leadership. This confusion has made OTF incapable of authorizing decisions on behalf of the nonprofit corporation that allow it to carry out its functions, including an inability to authorize funding for partner organizations or provide support for potential partner organizations.

The actions of Pack and USAGM have undermined trust in OTF as an organization. The nature of the projects funded by OTF means that partner organizations and individuals, who are often citizens of repressive regimes, could be subjected to harsh repercussions – even having their lives endangered – if their personal information is jeopardized. However, OTF has been able to work with these partners to promote internet freedom because it has earned their trust that it will ensure the safety of their identities and their work. This trust in OTF will continue to erode, though, the longer that there is uncertainty about the legitimacy of the leadership of the organization. Without the trust of its partners, OTF cannot fulfill its mission of promoting internet freedom efforts.

Because of the conflict created by these actions, OTF has been denied business for foreign currency payment services, resulting in increased transaction fees and additional financial burden to the organization.

These actions have caused serious delays in OTF’s ability to hire necessary staff, including delaying the hiring for six open positions crucial to the management and monitoring of OTF’s applications and projects.... The sudden upheaval in leadership also leaves the organization at risk of losing expert staff, including researchers, technologists, and regional experts. Losing such staff could compromise OTF’s ability to carry out its mission.

End result? Court says Pack has to take his fake board and go home. The original board and CEO are the rightful ones in charge of OTF:

Accordingly, pursuant to the plain language of the OTF’s bylaws, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment insofar as Plaintiff has demonstrated that the original Board is the only valid board.

It then orders that the original board is the valid board, that the removals by Pack were not valid, and that his replacement board is also not valid. Hopefully this is the end of Pack's willful destruction of important American institutions that protect freedom of speech, but somehow I doubt it will be.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: michael pack, otf, usagm, voa
Companies: open technology fund, otf, voa, voice of america


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 12:23pm

    'Stop doing that.' '... nah.'

    Hopefully this is the end of Pack's willful destruction of important American institutions that protect freedom of speech, but somehow I doubt it will be.

    Given his previous actions in ignoring a congressional subpeona I fully expect him to just ignore the court order as though it doesn't exist and carry on, same as before, or acknowledge it and claim that it doesn't matter because Trump put him there and as such the only authority that can tell him 'no' is Trump.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Razzo (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 12:26pm

    Cue useless Executive Order in 5...4...3...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 16 Oct 2020 @ 1:09pm

      Re:

      "Today I've signed an executive order that asks the Department of Justice to look into the very mean things the court said about my propaganda minister...I mean, my appointee at the US GAME agency. I think the court is a member of antifa terrorists and is very nasty."

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Phyllis Inn, Public Relations, 16 Oct 2020 @ 1:09pm

    Great! Support the traditional three-part American system!

    Which allows review of executive actions.

    And FEAR the Royalists whom our founders separated us from, for tyranny like this:

    UK bill set to pass today. Allows intelligence agencies (all agencies including police) the right to torture or eliminate anyone for any reason they deem necessary. No burden of proof necessary. Let's pray for them & that a bill like this never comes here t.co/9F2NFtAFTa

    sarah westall (@westall_sarahw) October 14, 2020

    https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2019-21/coverthumanintelligencesourcescriminalconduct.html

    Ya know that famous "license to kill" from the Bond novels? This is it spreading. And by the way, in Jolly Olde England's real law, "kill" is legally different from "murder". "Commoners" have status not much above animals, can be killed and a person would pay a money fine at most. But to end the life of a "Royal" is murder, to be punished by hanging, and not a nice clean American neck-snap, but drawn up and choked in the most ghastly possible way, then the body to be drawn and quartered.

    Gee, I'm glad we got the "royals" out of here.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 1:25pm

      FYI: At his COVID-spreading rally yesterday, Trump admitted — bragged, even! — that agents of the U.S. government executed a man without prior due process for no reason other than they didn’t want to arrest him. Whatever issues you have with tyranny, you’re doing a shit job of pointing it out where it should matter most to you.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        That One Guy (profile), 16 Oct 2020 @ 3:45pm

        Re:

        No worries, as I understand it there are a bunch of really pro-second amendment people out there who've argued that guns are absolutely vital in order to fight back against an oppressive and tyrannical government, which executing a man simply because you don't feel like giving him a trial would absolutely be a sign of, so I'm sure they will get right to doing that by joining one of the ongoing protests scattered around the country... sometime after they get home from the Trump rally.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 17 Oct 2020 @ 12:25am

        Re:

        Like all of his type, he whines about tyranny with even the most basic innocuous issue that he considers to be an inconvenience, but he's an all out brownshirt when he thinks he stands to benefit from it personally.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          David, 17 Oct 2020 @ 12:46pm

          Re: Re:

          At some point of time people will understand that "Deep State" is Trump's derogatory term for "checks and balances", "division of power" and "rule of law" and anything else not under immediate dictatorial control.

          Basically what constitutes a republic, if we can keep it.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      genghis_uk (profile), 17 Oct 2020 @ 7:51am

      Re: Great! Support the traditional three-part American system!

      It also helps if you understand the wider context that the UK bill has to operate under.
      The UK is a signatory of the Human Rights Act which forbids the use of torture and extra judicial killing.

      If you had read the discussion in the House, you would have seen this question being raised and the response:
      "They must also be compliant with our obligations under the Human Rights Act, including the right to life and the prohibition of torture or subjecting someone to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment"

      So this is not a license to kill, torture or anything else - it is intended to allow undercover agents to join otherwise banned organisations and operate on the fringes of the law but it does not give carte blanche to do anything they want.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 18 Oct 2020 @ 2:19am

        Re: Re: Great! Support the traditional three-part American syste

        "It also helps if you understand the wider context"

        He's allergic to that sort of thing

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2020 @ 8:55pm

      Re:

      How's that Manafort defense fund coming along, blue?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bobvious, 16 Oct 2020 @ 2:30pm

    So now we won't be able to see Michael

    Pack the OTF with a bunch of cronies. Besides he was Board with the old lot and said "CEO later".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Oct 2020 @ 6:12pm

    Well, this is going to screw up somebodies Human Resources and Payroll departments for awhile.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    restless94110 (profile), 17 Oct 2020 @ 8:02am

    Rule by Judges

    So the head Administrator of the Administration (Trump) does not have the right to appoint those he appoints? A judge can overrule the Executive?

    It's been known for years now that Voice of America and the others have become infected with SJW nonsense. It's time to change that back to what it used to be and what it was started for initially.

    whether the appointee plays bridge with Steve Bannon is none of any judge's (or any writer's at Tech Dirt) concern. When I President is elected he gets to make the decisions, free of 2nd guessing by kritarchs, which is a perversion of the American republic.

    Your biased writing has truly blinded you this constant judicial activism.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2020 @ 8:36am

      Re: Rule by Judges

      Will you still be supporting Trump when you are marched through the gates that say "Work makes free"?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Rocky, 17 Oct 2020 @ 9:07am

      Re: Rule by Judges

      As usual you misinterpret and conflate things to make a toothless attack. Or perhaps you didn't actually read the article and jumped to conclusions that fit your myopic narrative?

      • Trump has the power to appoint people to positions within the Federal Government. This is not what's discussed.
      • Trump appointed Pack.
      • Pack fired the OTF CEO and board and appointed new people.
      • The judge rightly found this to be against the bylaws.

      At which point does this decision say that Trump couldn't appoint Pack?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Toom1275 (profile), 17 Oct 2020 @ 9:08am

      Re: Rule by Judges

      [Projects facts not in evidence]

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      bhull242 (profile), 18 Oct 2020 @ 4:34pm

      Re: Rule by Judges

      The laws and rules governing the OTF explicitly state that only the board can remove existing members or add new members. Neither Trump nor his appointees have any authority over the OTF, period. Don’t like it? Tough.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2020 @ 10:43pm

      Re: Rule by Judges

      Your biased writing has truly blinded you this constant judicial activism

      I remember when horse with no name claimed that Otis Wright would get his just desserts for what he did to Prenda Law, too. How'd that work out again?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2020 @ 8:40am

    Pack is under the direct employment of the CCP.

    he takes regular envelopes of case (offshore stock and cash) in breach of pretty much any US law you care to name.

    Guy should be strapped to the electric chair for treason against the US and it's citizens.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.