Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the information-comment-provider dept

This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is That One Guy with the only sane response to seeing a jokey cartoon about police brutality in an official police use-of-force training presentation:

'What do you mean 'beating people' isn't funny? Since when?'

When your training material includes jokes about beating suspects you've given up any pretense of not being filled with and run by thugs, and the idea that it's just a 'bad apple' or two goes right out the window.

In second place, we've got an anonymous open message to the Senate in response to the latest all-out attack on encryption:

Dear Senate

You first. Break encryption on every method of communication that is used for official and unofficial use for the House and Senate. After a year of being able to review all of the important things that they are doing and verifying that it works without a problem, then consider rolling it out to the rest of us.

We have a thing called the constitution and it is there to keep this kind of law from being passed. You would have to amend that for any of these arguments to be at all valid.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with another anonymous comment about all the fresh attacks on Section 230, which I hope is overly pessimistic, but the sentiment is understandable:

It's only been three days and we have not one, not two, not three, but FIVE different bills targeting 230 all aiming to change it in ways that not only wouldn't do what they say, but just about enable the very things they claim to be against.

sigh 230 had a good run. It's just another reason why we can't have anything nice when we have people who either don't understand or are paid not to understand what they're legislating.

Next, it's another comment from That One Guy making an important point about Parler and other "free speech" social media platforms:

Just a reminder...

When someone claims that they want to force platforms to block only 'illegal' content it's important to remember that racism, sexism, all other forms of bigotry, advocating that some categories of people are inherently 'lesser', voicing support for nazi ideals and/or that the wrong side won the War to Preserve Slavery(otherwise known as the Civil war) are all legal speech and thus would be out of bounds for removal if moderation was only allowed to block/remove illegal content.

That is the kind of speech that those pushing 'neutrality' bills like this one are not just trying to protect but foist onto the public, whether people want it or not.

Over on the funny side, we've got a rare situation where both our winners are making exactly the same joke. On our big post designed as a destination for people who are getting Section 230 all wrong there were, of course, plenty of people getting it wrong in the comments — the perfect setup for some recursive humor. In first place, an anonymous commenter responded to someone who pushed back, insisting it is possible to "lose" Section 230 protections:

As it happens, I just came across a useful article to refer you to:

Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act

And in second place, we've got Toom1275 offering up a similar link to someone who decided to focus on the "good faith" concept — but since that comment is just the URL of the post and nothing else, there's no real need to quote it here, so... on to the editor's choice for funny!

First, we've got Stephen T. Stone responding to our post about Parler and, specifically, a brief conditional statement about whether Parler ever gets big enough to matter:

Narrator: It won’t.

And finally, we've got Thad projecting past the Section 230 ruling in Devin Nunes' cow lawsuit:

Next up, the judge unfairly rules that you can't sue someone who didn't break any laws.

That's all for this week, folks!


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    ECA (profile), 28 Jun 2020 @ 12:43pm

    Almost got it..

    " we have people who either don't understand or are paid not to understand what they're legislating. "

    But, they are expecting the other idiots NOT to be paid off, and they will do the right thing and Stomp on it.

    Free speech?
    expressing a comment, that derides and abuses others ISNT free..
    Unless you can explain HOW you got to that conclusion..
    How do you blame others for your lost job? Or that you are poor? of for any reason, beyond your OWN personal history.

    Lets say it like this.. Running around saying 'Christians Are'.. is very strange (IMO) its as if you are declaring for over 40 other groups of christians.. YOU CANT, you have never known there were that many groups, let alone that over 1/2 of them dont think you need to have a foreskin removed to be a CHRISTIAN.

    Until you can explain it in Logical or scientific format or context.. LEAVE it alone, let it Die, find a better way to express yourself them to Blame anyone else. And learn abit about history, and what REALLY happened, to create your OWN life. like a better education.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    charliebrown (profile), 28 Jun 2020 @ 7:05pm

    Section 230

    ..... is a dentist's favorite section!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    techflaws (profile), 28 Jun 2020 @ 9:40pm

    The section 230 primer should have links for the various paragraphs/points.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), 29 Jun 2020 @ 12:15am

    Re:

    The section 230 primer should have links for the various paragraphs/points.

    We originally planned to do that, but then realized that had some issues, notably in that anyone linked to it would miss the headline (which is important) and also some of the answers rely on you having read some of the earlier answers.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    Web Techno Solutions (profile), 29 Jun 2020 @ 1:30am

    Website Designing Company in Delhi | Web Techno Solutions

    A website is the face or getup of any organization in the current scenario of work and business environment That is why it becomes necessary that the website of any company looks presentable enough.
    https://www.thewebtechno.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Jeremy Lyman (profile), 29 Jun 2020 @ 4:41am

    Re: Re:

    Maybe a link with highlighted text?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Bobvious, 29 Jun 2020 @ 3:30pm

    Re: Section 230

    You mean it's the dentist's pick?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.