Chicago Mayor Says City's Police Officers Will Be 'Stripped Of Their Powers' If They Turn Off Their Cameras

from the much-much-more-of-this-please dept

Civic leaders are finally at least talking tough about reforming the police departments they've barely overseen for years. Protests -- some of them violent -- have erupted all over the nation, ensuring very few law enforcement agencies can consider themselves above the fray… or above reproach.

We'll see how much of this talk remains tough (or turns into action) once the heat dies down a bit, but for now, it's good to see political leaders stepping up to call out their law enforcement agencies as part of the problem.

Chicago has one of the nation's worst police forces -- one that has taken full advantage of the historically-corrupt political system in that city. Add to that another problematic entity that's found almost everywhere -- police unions -- and you have a bunch of officers who fear no reprisal, no matter what behavior they engage in.

The internal investigation process for cops accused of criminal acts and misconduct is a black hole where complaints go in but almost nothing comes out, even years after the investigations have closed. This lack of accountability is enforced by the city's contract with police unions, who have fought every minimal reform effort with gusto.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot knows this. She headed the Chicago Police Board, another oversight effort made mostly toothless by union interference and the police department's lack of interest in allowing anyone to police it.

So, her comment to NPR doesn't exactly tell anyone what they're not already aware of. But it does show Mayor Lightfoot is willing to directly address the root cause of multiple accountability issues.

"Unfortunately, in history in our city, and I think the history of other cities, unions are extraordinarily reluctant to embrace reform and that's a current state of affairs here," Lightfoot said in an interview Saturday with NPR's Weekend Edition. "We have had to take them to arbitration to win very modest reforms, and that's a shame of the history of collective bargaining where there hasn't been an emphasis on reform and accountability."

She also pointed out there needs to be a change in culture if any reforms are going to take hold. That's a key element that sometimes gets overlooked. Chicago cops have long disliked being watched by anyone, even their own recording devices. The killing of Laquan McDonald by a Chicago police officer could have been observed by any number of dashcams, but it was only captured by one of the four responding vehicles and that recording had no sound. Public records requests uncovered the fact that 80% of the PD's dashcams did not record sound due to "operator error or intentional destruction."

The Mayor's next public statement addressed this history directly. And it adds a level of accountability the Chicago PD has never placed on its own officers.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot called out police officers who turn off their body cameras Friday, stating they will be stripped of their "police powers."

There's more. Officers who make other efforts to exempt themselves from recognition or responsibility will be similarly professionally disgraced.

"Officers who choose to do those things, or to tape over their badges, or to turn off their body-worn cameras – all things that violate very clear directives of the Chicago Police Department – if you are one of those officers, we will find you, we will identify you, and we will strip you of your police powers. Period," Lightfoot said.

The police union has yet to respond directly to Lightfoot's commandeering of officer discipline procedures. When it does finally respond, it won't offer any contrition on behalf of the officers it represents or agree that officers need more discipline. After all, it's headed by a thug cop who was elected to his position by officers presumably supportive of his career.

[John] Catanzara is one of the most frequently-disciplined officers in the history of the Chicago Police Department. He is believed to be the first police union president ever elected while stripped of his police powers.

Any incremental increase in accountability is almost always greeted by officer resistance, usually led by their union reps. This will be no different. But if Lightfoot can get it to stick, there are going to be a lot of cops with no cop powers. This will keep them from abusing the power they no longer have, but this corrective action apparently won't harm their budding police union careers.

The head of the union represents the body. This is who Chicago PD officers wanted representing them. That says a whole lot about why the Chicago PD is in the shape it is today. A few small changes won't reverse its course. But it may provide a foothold for bigger changes in the future.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: body cameras, chicago, chicago police, lori lightfoot


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 3:29am

    'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

    If you've got a camera but it 'malfunctions' such that it's not recording you should not be treated as a cop by the legal system for anything you do during that 'malfunction'.

    If your badge 'for some strange reason' get obstructed so that members of the public can't identify you then you should be treated as off the clock and any actions will be as though you didn't have a badge at all.

    The idea that police who take active steps to avoid identification and accountability should be treated as though they weren't cops, stripped of the special privilege they otherwise enjoy as cops really shouldn't be seen as a huge or strange idea. Disgusting that it needs to come to that, but the idea shouldn't be seen as extreme in the slightest. That said, I have no doubt that when the union pulls it's head from it's ass and gets around to responding they will likely throw the tantrum to end all tantrums, shocked and appalled at the very idea that their precious cops face any sort of accountability, and by their actions showing just how corrupt they have become for anyone who might have recently taken a blow to the head and forgotten.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:24am

      Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

      So let me remind you of the BLM TRUTH!

      —The labor of Third World people has been stolen through slavery,
      super-exploited at low wages, and channeled into production meant to
      benefit the oppressor nation. Profits are drained from the Third World.
      Where reinvestment takes place within the oppressed nation, the priorities of
      the corporate powers determine where it will go.

      —The natural resources and raw materials of Third World countries
      have been expropriated by the imperialist powers, particularly the US. The
      recent actions of the oil-producing countries and the copper-producing
      countries are important attempts by Third World nations to wrest back
      control of these resources, and with them, of their own destinies.

      —Diversification of industry, real progress and rational economic
      growth arc prevented by imperialism. Where industriahzation is allowed to
      occur, control remains firmly in imperialist hands and, most often,
      consumer-oriented industries are pushed rather than agriculture or heavy
      industry. This keeps the ''developing" country dependent on imperialist
      technology and aid.

      THAT'S RIGHT! AND BLM IS THE ANSWER! PAY IN FOR YOUR GARBAGE, BOTH REAL AND FROM YOUR PARENTS, IN ADVANCE, JUST LIKE OBAMACARE! IT IS YOUR DUTY AND WE AT BLM REQUIRE IT! REPORT YOUR PRIVILEGE! EVERY DAY! GET DOWN ON YOUR KNEES!

      This message approved by Joe Biden, the Intellectually Absent President (in his mind, and Hillary's)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:40am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        Hamilton is apparently upset if cops aren't allowed to kill non-white people without question.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        TaboToka (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:52am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        Why are you so frightened?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:55am

          Re: Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

          The idea that a black man should, at some point in the future, NOT have to kneel before the white man sends him into anxiety attacks.

          I can somehow understand that. If you are such a loser in life nobody has less to be proud of you'll cling to the idea that there is someone you still get to kick, with a white-knuckled grip.

          That's what the bottom layer of a white supremacy group looks like. Utter no-hope losers who have failed at absolutely everything and are now left with the idea that at least the color of their skin, to which they were born by chance, means they're "better" than someone else who might be just as badly off but has dark skin.

          Equality means taking that away, stripping them of the mental crutch which is, well, all they have left to lean on. It's tough, being a racist shitheap.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        lucidrenegade (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:33am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        Diarrhea of the keyboard...

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Toom1275 (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 9:07am

          Re: Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

          Considering the formatting (or rather, the lack therof) it's more like diarrhea on the keyboard.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:51am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        Weird. you state a number of obvious and available facts which have been argued over and debated for many years by independent researchers all around the world...
        ...and then come out with the idea that fighting racism in the US is primarily related to the result of bad national realpolitik?

        White supremacists have finally gone over the deep end completely.
        If racial equality is such a menace you feel compelled to argue that it's the next new Global Conspiracy then why the fsck would you choose to remain in a nation which was founded on egalitarian principles and the writing on racial equality had been on the wall since civil war times?

        But hey, at least this time you managed to get the "But Obama!" in sideways. I guess your KKK membership card is safe then.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Baron von Robber, 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:59am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        Because you were doing better when you took your meds, doesn't mean you can stop taking your med.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anon, 9 Jun 2020 @ 8:05am

      Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

      The interesting question is - what happens to qualified immunity from civil lawsuits when a police officer is not really a police officer? The essence of QI is that you cannot be sued for "doing your job" any more than a judge can be sued for the sentence he hands down or a DMV official for flunking your driving test or eyesight test.

      But... if you are not empowered as a police officer through your own actions and you know it, and act in an inappropriate way - presumably you are wide open to personal lawsuits.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        That One Guy (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 11:34am

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        The interesting question is - what happens to qualified immunity from civil lawsuits when a police officer is not really a police officer?

        It would be gone, and they would be treated no differently than anyone else who doesn't enjoy the magical 'get out of personal responsibility' card that is QI.

        Mind, I would prefer that the whole rotten QI be killed off entirely, but until that happens 'no QI if you take any steps to avoid accountability' would at least make for a good improvement.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          gamesjon (profile), 10 Jun 2020 @ 9:19pm

          Re: Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

          I'm about to respond to Anon, but I did just want to add that the issue isn't quite as simply as you seem to imagine. Now, I am absolutely for eliminating QI & rebuilding something different & significantly more restrained... but what Anon means is that most of what the police do physically in their job would be called crimes if you or I did it. If you were to "arrest" someone you would be charged with false imprisonment & kidnapping. If you were to drive like police typically do when responding to an actual emergency or serious call then you would be guilty of dozens of traffic violations & reckless endangerment. The list goes on & on.

          From what I understand about the historical development of the QI doctrine it originally was just supposed to do what most of us would think it should do [i.e. if a cop arrests someone who legitimately violated the law they can't be sued for kidnapping & false imprisonment.]However, it was in the early 1980s that Supreme Court decisions began to alter its interpretation in a pretty significant way which is led to this almost blanket immunity no matter what they do.

          But, if there was not some formal thing that tried to lay out exactly what immunity they get what do you think is more likely to happen; A) police get the type of limited immunity they should have for their legitimate job functions & lose that immunity when they engage in some sort of misconduct or inappropriate behavior or B) police get full blanket immunity for anything & everything they do?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        gamesjon (profile), 10 Jun 2020 @ 10:21pm

        Re: Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

        The essence of QI is that you cannot be sued for "doing your job"...

        The problem though is that this has not been how QI has functioned for a number of years now. It began to substantially change in nature beginning with the 1982 Harlow v. Fitzgerald decision which fundamentally altered past precedent in what sort of judicial tests claims are put through. Today, cops have immunity no matter what the facts are or what they did unless a plaintiff can find precedent that meets the "clearly established law" requirement & with the required level of specificity.

        Let me quote here from a March 1, 2020 article in the North Carolina Law Review A One-Two Punch: How Qualified Immunity's Double Dose of Reasonableness Dooms Excessive Force Claims in the Fourth Circuit:

        In Mullenix v. Luna, the Fifth Circuit found that shooting a fleeing motorist in a high-speed pursuit violated a clearly established right, but the Supreme Court reversed & rebuked the Fifth Circuit for describing the right too broadly. Although the Fifth Circuit described the officer's actions as "deadly force against a fleeing felon who does not pose a sufficient threat of harm to the officer or others," the correct inquiry was whether the officer's conduct was prohibited "in the 'situation [she] confronted. '" With proper specificity, the analysis should have included pivotal facts: "a reportedly intoxicated fugitive, set on avoiding capture through high-speed vehicular flight, who twice during his flight had threatened to shoot police officers, & who was moments away from encountering an officer at Cemetery Road. " With those new facts, the case law became too muddied to establish a clear rule for the officer to have followed. And if the case law is too murky, a plaintiff like Mullenix cannot use it to analogize to his own case & show the law was clearly established.

        The Supreme Court itself had already included a number of Qualified Immunity cases in the cases that they are currently considering on taking, even prior to all the recent events they had put forward a list of 13 such cases on their list of cases they were considering... although they ultimately rejected 3 of those & are undecided on the others.

        Also, yeah the slogans for changes to this legal doctrine have been about "ending qualified immunity," but like pretty much every slogan ever [especially slogans for things that are complicated & technical in nature,] they are extremely simplified ways to message a more detailed, boring idea that 99% of people simply tune out. None of the ideas that have been legitimately considered or pushed [by people who can actually implement them & not some random person,] are things that eliminate qualified immunity. They merely change the details of its technical implementation in the courts. Most of them, if not all them, either reverse or prohibit the use of the problem-causing changes in the doctrine that began happening in the 1980s.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Kitsune106, 9 Jun 2020 @ 12:01pm

      Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

      I do live action roleplay. And I do run with an in-game group. So my actions reflect on that group and I get to use that groups authority.... But only when I am wearing my tabard/colors. Same for police. If police cannot be easily identified.or go to lengths to hide... We should treat as not cops. After all, how are.we to know a cop and not someone pretending.

      Irl, there was.someone who was dressed up as a national guard who got caught. And given police are out with little identification, how do we know it's really police and not bad actors? Police should be required to be identified now. Republicans claims terrorist are.out to get us. False flags by.twrrorists.as.police would be one way
      And how will you disprove it when all the legit police are.hiding too?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Bergman (profile), 10 Jun 2020 @ 12:52pm

      Re: 'If the uniform is off, you're not a cop.'

      What would really make this effective is a city ordinance that declares that any on-duty action taken by a police officer who has their badge covered or body camera off/non-functional will be considered an action by a private citizen.

      Therefore the police insurance won't cover them, they won't be shielded by qualified immunity, they will be subject to all the same laws non-cops are to the fullest extent of the law, any arrests they make are considered citizen's arrests, they can't lawfully possess a firearm where a private citizen could not, their court testimony is treated the same as that of any citizen, etc.

      No need for anyone to file paperwork or appeal something or declare anything, just make their police powers automatically null and void.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:31am

    and...

    If the cops still get acquitted after killing/beating unarmed citizens WITH THE COP CAM ON, what's the difference?

    There needs to be legal, financial, and physical accountability for police brutality.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Dan Bongino and BCP, 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:39am

      Re: and...

      You are so right.

      US society is corrupted by the values that necessarily accompany
      piracy —racism, greed, competitiveness, brutality, sexism, callousness. The
      ruling class calls the backward, criminal aspects of culture into being and sets
      them into motion. The society is the rat-race, marked hv an anti-social
      premium on individualism. There is a stark poverty for masses of people
      materially and culturally, a poverty in the quality of life. Not like the Chinese! They're organized, all in agreement, and ready to support their Government! Not like you assholes! Wait, what? Techdirt is the Pirate party?

      —Hunger and starvation are world realities. In the US over 30
      million people cannot afford to meet basic nutritional needs. Especially Vitamin D, which is freely available with sunshine, now prohibited! In spite of
      these facts, the US government pays farmers billions of dollars a year not to
      grow food. This keeps food prices high. The war of the rich and the poor has
      taken on terrible proportions —the face of famine, malnutrition, epidemic
      against the face of glut. Glut? Really? Fat Fuckers like Michael Moore?

      Well, actually that was 60 years ago. Now the Chinese are ready to suck our dicks (all of 'em), because of my personal friend Donald J. Trump, the Magnificent.

      And now my friend will be YOUR FRIEND as we CRUSH these LEFTIST TRAITOROUS SEDITIOUS RAT BASTARDS (Techdirt).

      Thank you Bill Barr for your Terrorist Designation of Techdirt.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 5:54am

        Re: Re: and...

        If Techdirt is a terrorist site, how did Shiva Ayyadurai's lawsuit fail? Not enough tiger fairies from Massachusetts?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Khym Chanur (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:30am

        Re: Re: and...

        And now my friend will be YOUR FRIEND as we CRUSH these LEFTIST TRAITOROUS SEDITIOUS RAT BASTARDS (Techdirt).

        Thank you Bill Barr for your Terrorist Designation of Techdirt.

        Can't tell if this is meant as parody/satire of how leftists view you, or if you're being completely serious.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          lucidrenegade (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:37am

          Re: Re: Re: and...

          Not sure if he knows himself.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            TFG, 9 Jun 2020 @ 7:03am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: and...

            I think it's the return of blue boy. The changing names is an indicator. Either that or an imitator. As ever, flag and move on.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 10 Jun 2020 @ 6:09am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: and...

              "I think it's the return of blue boy."

              Oh, he never left. Despite giving us all hope several times by promising to do so.

              But it's pretty telling the only times he comes out with real gusto is when he finds the opportunity to stand on a soapbox and declare the virtues of copyright maximalism or white supremacy.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 7:02am

          Re: Re: Re: and...

          "Can't tell if this is meant as parody/satire of how leftists view you, or if you're being completely serious."

          The problem is that the average trumpist sounds like a bad parody of a clown to begin with. I mean there are comedians out there who gave up on trying to parody Trump because no matter what they did he'd beat them at their own game by doing or saying something even more deranged the very next day.

          Unless you see the sarcasm tag at the end, that little /s, then unfortunately assume it's some trumpist going at it for real.

          Normally. This particular commenter, however, has a few tells to him which give away his identity. He's wrecked Poe's law well before Trump was ever a factor and he's never been anything less than completely insane in his comments. That's how Baghdad Bob rolls. Or Hamilton, Jhon, bobmail, or whatever else he likes to currently call his sock puppet accounts.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Baron von Robber, 9 Jun 2020 @ 7:02am

        Re: Re: and...

        Remember that time we were walking down the street and we saw that dog licking himself and you said, "I wish I could do that". I told you, "Maybe you should pet him first." But noooooo. Now you need rabies shots.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Upstream (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:35am

    She also pointed out there needs to be a change in culture if any reforms are going to take hold. That's a key element that sometimes gets overlooked.

    This ^. A change in culture usually requires broad, principled, sustained pressure, from a variety of sources, over a considerable period of time. Most politicians have a "sound bite / photo op / check which way the wind blows" mentality, which is good for getting elected, but not for changing a culture.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Your Friendly NIKE Salesman (also BLM part time), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:50am

      Re:

      US society is corrupted by the values that necessarily accompany
      US society—racism, greed, competitiveness, brutality, sexism, callousness. The
      ruling class calls the backward, criminal aspects of culture into being and sets
      them into motion. The society is the rat-race, marked hv an anti-social
      premium on individualism. There is a stark poverty for masses of people
      materially and culturally, a poverty in the quality of life. Just look at the people here! Techdirt is Corrupt and Not Fit for BLM!

      Change the Culture? The Chinese Revolution? The Soviet Revolution? The American Revolution? Omerica? Obama-America, the SOLUTION to the CORRUPTED American Society. PAY YOUR GARBAGE FEES. STAY INSIDE! No VITAMIN D! If you want to protest for BLM, that's OK, but otherwise, STAY INSIDE AND PAY YOUR GARBAGE. Thank you and don't forget to contribute, On Your Knees, you WHITE SUPREMACIST ASSHOLES! CONTRIBUTE TO BLM! INTEL DID! NIKE DID! DO IT! DO IT! CONTRIBUTE! OR ELSE! JUST DO IT!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 11 Jun 2020 @ 5:45am

        Re: Re:

        Damn, Baghdad Bob, you just won't quit pretending you're...what you might think a black activist is like.

        I have to say, you are not pulling off the blackface act well. Your acting isn't exactly shakespeare.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 6:48am

    Stripped of their Immunity

    I don't want them only stripped of their powers, I want them also stripped of any qualified immunity.

    Cops that complain about cameras are the ones we DON'T want. Those cameras work both ways. They not only make obvious who the bad cops are, but they also are valuable defense for false claims against good cops.

    And there are good cops out there. The simple fact is that 99% of cops give the rest a bad name.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 8:08am

      Re: Stripped of their Immunity

      US society is corrupted by the values that necessarily accompany
      piracy —racism, greed, competitiveness, brutality, sexism, callousness. The
      ruling class calls the backward, criminal aspects of culture into being and sets
      them into motion. The society is the rat-race, marked hv an anti-social
      premium on individualism. There is a stark poverty for masses of people
      materially and culturally, a poverty in the quality of life.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 8:22am

      Re: Stripped of their Immunity

      Stripped? Stripped Naked? Pervert!

      Another major factor at this point was the rebellion of women
      against sexism in the society and in the left. The left is not immune from the
      sexism which pervades US society: the oppressor culture persists and must
      be opposed and fought again and again. This requires an active commitment
      to anti-sexism. In the late sixties and early seventies many women left the
      anti-imperialist movement and built a separate women's movement. Sisters
      inside —and now outside— the anti-imperiliast movement began to force men
      to deal with their sexist practice. These were absolutely necessary advances.
      The struggles against sexism did not only mean criticism and change of
      individual practice, they also transformed the overall analysis of the left. The
      contradiction was that the women's movement, rejecting sexist and
      authoritarian leadership, raised blanket challenges to all forms of leadership
      and organization in the movement, good and had, and failed at that point to
      build lasting organizations to carry on the task of strong determined
      anti-imperialist struggle.

      Pay your garbage fees! Contribute to BLM! OR Else.

      (A friendly community reminder from your local Obama zealot)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Thad (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 9:09am

      Re: Stripped of their Immunity

      I don't want them only stripped of their powers, I want them also stripped of any qualified immunity.

      House Democrats introduced a bill yesterday that would greatly restrict QI. It doesn't go far enough, and I don't think there's any chance of it passing this Senate and this President, but I think even getting Congress to talk about QI is an important step.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ed (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 11:01am

    Attack the police unions!

    Until the police unions are routed, there will be no reform. The police unions are the largest terrorist/organized crime organization on the planet. They've been allowed to run roughshod over the Constitution at will and must be put down. The days of them giving cover to criminal cops is over.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Jun 2020 @ 11:23am

    Hi cities! Rewrite you laws and the charters for your police departments, ok? Cut them in half, divorce any special units (like SWAT) from regular policing (and stop using them for normal warrant service and bill collection), create departments to handle the various things that police or paramedics regularly get called to handle for which most of them are wholly unqualified.

    Remove any fusion center from your town. Stop buying military hardware. Stop using air surveillance and cell site simulators. Stop your (already illegal and against policy) political intel gathering operations.

    After warming up with this, then we can get to work.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Jun 2020 @ 2:55pm

    IIRC isn't this the same department where they kept having dash cams breaking down every day so they couldn't record anything. They would be repaired & magically stop working when the officers got access to the car.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.