DOJ Says Coronavirus Emergency Justifies Indefinite Detention Of Arrested People

from the not-enough-dystopian-hellscape,-say-Justice-reps dept

With the administration no longer able to ignore the threat posed by the coronavirus, it's decided to secure some additional powers for itself while the nation's defenses are low. As Betsy Woodruff Swan reports for Politico, the DOJ is seeking to add "indefinite detention" to its list of criminal justice perks as courtrooms around the nation undergo significant operational restrictions.

The Justice Department has quietly asked Congress for the ability to ask chief judges to detain people indefinitely without trial during emergencies — part of a push for new powers that comes as the novel coronavirus spreads throughout the United States.

Documents reviewed by POLITICO detail the department’s requests to lawmakers on a host of topics, including the statute of limitations, asylum and the way court hearings are conducted. POLITICO also reviewed and previously reported on documents seeking the authority to extend deadlines on merger reviews and prosecutions.

The DOJ has refused to comment on this power grab. Not all of it is unusual. Plenty of cases already in progress are going to be delayed because of restrictions on courts meant to stem the flow of the virus. But this goes beyond cases that are already underway. This would affect people who've only been accused of criminal acts and have yet to receive even a single day in court.

The proposal would also grant those top judges broad authority to pause court proceedings during emergencies. It would apply to “any statutes or rules of procedure otherwise affecting pre-arrest, post-arrest, pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures in criminal and juvenile proceedings and all civil process and proceedings,” according to draft legislative language the department shared with Congress.

Judges already have some power to control proceedings during emergencies, but this asks judges to treat cases where only an arrest has occurred as events that can be strung out indefinitely. With so many lives already disrupted by the shutdown of businesses and services, putting an accused person's life in indefinite limbo is only going to cause more harm to a population that is already suffering plenty of it.

Fortunately, this has already been shot down by members of Congress. And it's not just along party lines. Riley Beggin reports for Vox that the rejection of the DOJ's power move is bipartisan.

Legal experts and politicians on both sides of the aisle quickly condemned the request. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) tweeted “OVER MY DEAD BODY;” Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) wrote, “Two Words: Hell No;” and Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted “Absolutely not” — a sentiment Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) chief strategist, Doug Stafford, agreed with.

This isn't quite the same thing as being shot down in the halls of Congress itself, so there's still a small chance the DOJ will get its way. But this doesn't bode well for its opportunistic move, which seems more punitive than useful, especially when putting more people behind bars increases the odds of the virus spreading. Quarantine is almost impossible in jails and prisons, and even if you don't care about accused criminals, the people staffing jails aren't able to perform their duties without mingling with a possibly infected population.

The DOJ is also asking for a prosecution pause button while court proceedings are on hold, allowing it to bypass the statute of limitations for cases originating during this national emergency. It would give the DOJ at least a two-year pass, covering both current cases and any developing within a year of the "end" of the national emergency. There's nothing wrong with asking for this, since doing otherwise would basically give criminals a free pass for federal crimes committed during the national emergency. But it does suggest it's far more than the economy that's going to be disrupted for months (or years) to come.

If there's anything positive in this last request, it's that it may result in better prosecutorial discretion. With manpower limited and courts mostly closed for business, the DOJ will have to pick and choose which cases it wants to pursue. This will hopefully lead to less effort wasted prosecuting people for things like lying to feds or being talked into being terrorists by FBI informants.

Filed Under: congress, covid-19, doj, due process, indefinite detention

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Scary Devil Monastery (profile), 26 Mar 2020 @ 3:04am

    Re: That meme was once very effective. Not somuch in the digital

    " Sure, the Noble, Free, USA once employed Nazi scientists!"

    To be completely correct the nazi scientists were divided between the US and the USSR. It wasn't exactly a secret either, to the point where Tom Lehrer's song about "Werner von Braun" became a smashing hit.

    But realpolitik is not "conspiracy" and this was about as subtle as the archetypical colonial land grab.

    "Just look at Claus D. and his pal, Scary Devil Monastery for evidence of that. And look deeply into the two years log battle I have had with an autistic bhull, and other spergs here."

    So basically you're whining that we're flagging your ass for repetitively being an ableist bigot who keeps spouting bona fide nazi rhetoric while claiming you aren't actually an anti-semite?

    "...cannot stop itselfs from spewing conspiracy theory!!!!! every time we peel back another layer of JTRIG/CIA/NGO/DoD disinformation."

    Well, we could always call it simple bullshit because that is what it is. All you keep doing is serve up word salads about alphabet soup agencies who have easily understood political motives for what they do rater than simply marching to the tune of the Global Jewish Conspiracy.

    "Either way, we are dealing with radical zionists and dominionists, very frequently racist and Kabballists..."

    Strange how you always try to make the question out to be one of religion when every last example you usually serve up is very specifically jewish.
    And hilariously bad examples at that. I mean, unless you think the kabbalist mystics are actually capable of magic I'm not sure how some dude who spends 24/7 of his time studying old tomes looking for numerical patterns is much of a threat.

    "These are not real people. Shoot them on sight, partisan!"

    So all you have, once again, is a collection of ethnic and ableist slurs along with loose allegations of conspiracies involving the alphabet soup agencies all marching to the tune of ze jews. And at the end, a call to murder those who refuse to believe your bullshit.

    It would be a miracle if you didn't end up generating flag-on-sight reflexes in ANY reader even nominally rational.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.