Washington State Legislators Pass Bill Blocking Use Of Facial Recognition Tech Without A Warrant

from the over-the-sobbing-of-law-enforcement-agencies dept

We all like a good facial recognition ban, and the state of Washington is the latest to (sort of) tee one up.

The Washington state legislature passed a bill establishing new guardrails on government use of facial recognition software.

The bill cleared both chambers of the state legislature Thursday, hours before the session ended, positioning Washington as one of the first states in the nation to regulate facial recognition, a key component in the larger legal debate over artificial intelligence. The bill now awaits Gov. Jay Inslee’s signature.

Unfortunately, it's not a true ban. But it lays down a set of guidelines that will at least control its use by state agencies. The bill [PDF] requires regular reporting on use and intermittent testing for "fairness and accuracy." It also introduces something most states haven't: a warrant requirement for facial recognition use. This means facial recognition tech can't be an "always on" option for law enforcement.

The bill recognizes the threat facial recognition tech poses to the public.

Unconstrained use of facial recognition services by state and local government agencies poses broad social ramifications that should be considered and addressed. Accordingly, legislation is required to establish safeguards that will allow state and local government agencies to use facial recognition services in a manner that benefits society while prohibiting uses that threaten our democratic freedoms and put our civil liberties at risk.

It also mandates the development of data retention policies and the implementation of reporting and controls of other, non-state agency use of facial recognition tech owned by state entities. State agencies are also required to deliver the equivalent of Privacy Impact Assessments for any tech deployed.

A description of any potential impacts of the facial recognition service on civil rights and liberties, including potential impacts to privacy and potential disparate impacts on marginalized communities, and the specific steps the agency will take to mitigate the potential impacts and prevent unauthorized use of the facial recognition service.

While an outright ban (or at least a moratorium) would have been preferable, this is a positive development. It shows legislators recognize the multiple issues this tech poses and its tendency to exacerbate existing inequality problems by being seemingly incapable of accurately identifying anything other than white males.

If this bill becomes law, Washington will join a handful of cities (and one state!) around the country taking measures to protect residents from unproven tech that is swiftly becoming ubiquitous. Facial recognition tech is no longer the latest "rule of law" darling. It's increasingly being viewed as a threat to civil liberties -- not just by privacy advocates/activists, but by the people who actually can prevent their constituents from the steady creep of government surveillance.

Filed Under: 4th amendment, facial recognition, law enforcement, warrants, washington


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    ROGS, 29 Mar 2020 @ 11:59am

    Re: Slippery Slope

    No, the precedent was set already.

    Back during the early aughts, they were discussing whether or not it is ethical, or good, to force entire townships of males to be forced to submit DNA because some drunken bimbo at a party claimed she was raped.

    Now, they drag the "Golden State Killer" case around to prove that the great DNA trap that they sprang via the geneology databases is an effective crime fighting tool.

    The truth is somewhere in between, but who cares?I am certain that cops knew who the GSK was anyways, but kept his identity secret because most cops are involved in that kind of creepy shit (Masonic thin blue-line bullshit and illegal activity).

    The FACT is that these "tools" are essentially a police state coup against individual rights and the Constitution, proven time and time again.

    And that, because of drunken bimbos who party naked, and then regret it the next day because they are trained like dogs to grab a ring, instead of an orgasm.

    All of that, thanks to that shitbags like John Walsh and Americas Most Wanted( hahaha I am glad your kid got killed, John Walsh. Fuck you,I hope Ottis Toole splooged on your hell-spawns corpse there in Broward County, which is ground zero for gang stalking by cops) and those who are afraid that their daughters might actually like fucking, and be responsible for their own actions while fucking for fun and sport.

    A win for police state Feminism!

    And, the children,. of course.

    Of Course!!


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.