HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! Looking for something to read instead? Check out our new Working Futures anthology »
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! Looking for something to read instead? Check out our new Working Futures anthology »

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the what-they-say dept

This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is Matthew Cline, responding to two parts of a comment from a defender of a proposed ag-gag law in Australia:

Hi I live in Australia and have seen the incredible damage these protesters are doing. No wonder the farmers want them off their farms. ... These laws although may be oppressive in a lot more places are needed to corrall these twits and take them out of the way of farmers quickly.

There's already trespassing laws to handle that.

And punish them for damage done without taking time and money from the farmers.

And also already laws to deal with vandalism and/or destruction of property.

In second place, we've got bob expanding on a useful analogy about the difference between APIs and software:

I like the comparison of an API to a menu.

Often you will look over what is available to use in the documentation or even the header file and then select the right API that will call the code you need to perform an action. Then you supply any necessary inputs and get some output.

As a diner, you will look over the menu. Select a dish and supply inputs (money) to cause the item to be made. you probably won't see how the food was prepared, cooked, or what is being done by restaurant staff. Then your food comes (output) and it hopefully is representing what was advertised by the menu.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with one more comment about API copyrightability, this time from crade explaining why it's important for people to be able to copy APIs:

No one said they don't result in "code" or that they aren't a key part. They are not copyrightable because they are usage instructions and not implementation details. The API isn't executable and is not a program.

You need to have the same API in order to replace the application with your own application so that other applications will be able to use your program instead of the one you are replacing. It is an agreement between the calling program and the called program and it only explains how to call the implementation and does not provide any implementation details.

The only reason to copy an API is so that you can write your own competing program to be able to drop in as a replacement for an existing one and the only reason to argue that people shouldn't be allowed to copy APIs is to prevent people from writing their own programs to replace yours.

Next, we've got an anonymous commenter providing an excellent point of comparison for the ridiculous claim that PACER costs $100-million a year to operate:

As a point of comparison, the Internet Archive's budget is about $10 million/year. That's for the whole thing—digital hosting and storage, indexing, physical archiving, salaries, etc.—including as much PACER data as they've been able to get their hands on via RECAP. They charge $0 for people to access those digital copies. Their search engine's not great, but neither is PACER's, and I think they could improve that for less than $90 million.

Over on the funny side, our first place winner is David trying to assuage our obvious frustration over broadband industry manipulation of the net neutrality debate, and the failure of government agencies to respond:

Gee, so many negatives.

You sound upset. Do you want free credit monitoring? No need to provide your data and authorization, we already have it.

In second place, we've got McKay with a response to Devin Nunes' latest lawsuit:

"No, no, no, we're not involved with Iowa."
<files lawsuit in Iowa>
smh

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with Stephen T. Stone serving up one more dig at Nunes:

If I say “Devin Nunes is an asshole” three times in a mirror, will I be served with a lawsuit designed to make me shut up?

And finally, because how could I resist, we've got Kev Yassem responding to Jerry Seinfeld's victory against a bogus lawsuit:

NO SUE FOR YOU!

That's all for this week, folks!


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Bobvious, 6 Oct 2019 @ 3:02pm

    NO SUE FOR YOU!

    I guess he can try again in "one year".

    Or maybe the judge will just say "Do I know you?"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Oct 2019 @ 7:12pm

    "Hey, Shiva! Would you like some sue? NO SUE FOR YOU!"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    David, 7 Oct 2019 @ 2:08am

    Credit monitoring

    You sound upset. Do you want free credit monitoring? No need to provide your data and authorization, we already have it.

    Oh wow, I didn't even check whether this one received votes. Frankly, I don't get the "free credit monitoring" thing. "Hi, we are the company that proved to be unable to deal responsibly with your data. How about giving us access to your finances and letting us continually track them, this time with your permission?"

    How is that recompensation rather than making things worse?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Oct 2019 @ 5:14am

    Is querying for a WSDL a copyright violation now?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Oct 2019 @ 6:09am

    Then your food comes (output) and it hopefully is representing what was advertised by the menu.

    The only problem with menus is that occasionally you get served a Polonium Cocktail instead of tea.

    Support Fair Trade Certified software ...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Oct 2019 @ 8:03am

    Re: Credit monitoring

    How is that recompensation rather than making things worse?

    It isn't, but have some sympathy for the poor credit bureaus. They'd be bankrupt many times over if they had to fairly compensate people—or, indeed, pay them for their personal data in the first place.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Thad (profile), 7 Oct 2019 @ 8:17am

    Re: Credit monitoring

    In this case Yahoo would, presumably, be paying for credit monitoring through some third-party company rather than doing it in-house.

    But in the case of Equifax, yeah, offering credit monitoring from the company that fucked up its credit monitoring is absurd.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.