Federal Elections Committee Chair Is Sick Of Donald Trump's Bullshit: Put Up Or Shut Up About Voter Fraud

from the the-hero-we-need dept

Just days after the two Republican members of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) blocked an investigation into the NRA and its use of Russian funds to influence the election, the chair of the FEC (who voted for that investigation) has pointed out that Donald Trump should put up or shut up with his totally baseless, absolutely insane, claims that "voter fraud" cost him millions of votes in the election.

The letter itself is too good not to share, so I'll reprint it here. Don't miss the kicker at the end.

Mr. President,

Back in February 2017, when you first alleged a voter-fraud scheme of astonishing scale in New Hampshire in 2016, I publicly called upon you to provide your evidence to the American people and the appropriate law enforcement authorities so that your very serious claims could be investigated. I followed up in March 2017 with a letter to you repeating my request.

You have not, so far, provided any proof of these allegations.

Last night, you repeated your claim: "New Hampshire should've been won last time," you told reporters before your rally, "except we had a lot of people come in at the last moment, which was a rather strange situations, thousands and thousands of people, coming in from locations unknown. But I knew where their location was." During your rally, you told the crowd that New Hampshire was "taken away from us."

What I wrote to you in March 2017 is just as true now: Our democracy depends on the American people's faith in our elections. Your voter-fraud allegations run the risk of undermining that faith. Just as seriously, baseless allegation of fraud have been used to rationalize indefensible laws that deter certain U.S. citizens from exercising their right to vote. Words matter, and facts matter.

The American people count on me, as the Chair of their Federal Election Commission, to protect the integrity of our elections. So I ask you, once again, to provide any evidence you may have to the American people and the appropriate law-enforcement authorities to substantiate your claims. The American people are ill-served when our leaders put forward unfounded allegations of voter fraud.

To put it in terms a former casino operator should understand: There comes a time when you need to lay your cards on the table or fold.

This is an excellent letter that will make no difference in the world, unfortunately. The FEC has no real power, and as the vote on the NRA/Russia shows, even if she wanted to do something about it Weintraub is blocked by the others on the Commission. But the larger point is that the President doesn't care. Because he doesn't need to. He will make up whatever he wants, and whatever he needs to soothe his ego of himself and his angry sycophantic fans (yes, I'm looking forward to the comments on this one), because that's really all he's got to go on these days. He can and will ignore the chair of the FEC and he will continue to spout this completely made up nonsense of voter fraud in New Hampshire because it suits his narrative -- and his narrative is always facts-optional.

Filed Under: donald trump, ellen weintraub, evidence, fec, new hampshire, voter fraud


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Baron von Robber, 23 Aug 2019 @ 1:56pm

    Even that den of libby liberal liberalism, the Heritage Foundation can only find a few documented cases of voter fraud.

    https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:02pm

    Umm... this is actually pretty well-documented. NH got "swung" to Hillary by a bunch of people from Massachusetts fraudulently registering with same-day voter registration as people who "had just moved to New Hampshire". NH had tried to pass a voter ID law to prevent this sort of crap from happening, only to have it overturned by a court that found the usual race-baiting nonsense persuasive. (Riiiiight. If anyone thinks New Hampshire, one of the most milk-white states in the entire nation -- approximately 95% -- has enough minorities to even be worth suppressing, I've got a bridge to sell them. There simply aren't enough minorities there to be able to affect the election by their presence or absence anyway. But that's not stopping the usual suspects from pulling out the same tired old narrative no matter how obviously false it is.)

    Afterwards, attempts to find these newly-moved-in "residents" failed for approximately 5,000 of them, nearly double the margin by which Clinton "won" the state. Why? Because they weren't residents and never had been. It's hard to reach any other conclusion than that the state was stolen by massive voter fraud, by the party that consistently undermines legitimate attempts to combat voter fraud.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Glen, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:14pm

      Re:

      [Citation needed]

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:15pm

      Re:

      You say this is well documented. Yet you don't provide a reference to said documents. Interesting.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Baron von Robber, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:24pm

      Re:

      Evidence not presented, case dismissed.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 6:41pm

        Re: Electoral Fraud evidence

        Evidence does not conveniently fall from the sky -- it requires very large investigative resources by unbiased people seeking truth.

        Thus far, we only have a few small studies by a few small political groups on the left and right. These little studies reach contradictory conclusions and are highly controversial.

        Federal/state/local politicians are not interested in conducting serious investigations of electoral fraud because the findings might cast doubt upon the validity of many elections ... and the many government officials who assumed power from those elections.
        Most all observers agree there is "some" fraud in American elections, but the government & establishment media claim it is very exaggerated (without proof of that)

        Terminology is a big confusion factor and handy dodge.
        "Voter-Fraud" is just a narrow subset of overall "Electoral Fraud" categories.
        Voter Fraud is basically an individual casting an illegal ballot -- it's a relatively small part of Electoral-Fraud and more easily detected.

        The biggest part of Electoral-Fraud is Fraud by government election officials--illegal manipulation of ballots by officials trusted to administer the election.
        This "insider" fraud is difficult to detect; it usually involves some method of creating extra illegal votes and/or losing/hiding legitimate votes. This fraud is fairly common, but if noticed is usually dismissed as balloting"irregularities" or innocent administrative error.
        NYC election officials somehow "lost" 200,000 legitimate votes in November 2010. Clay County Kentucky election officials were recently convicted of egregious vote manipulation. Palm Beach Florida Elections Office was a cesspool of corruption in the 2018 elections.

        Few people consider the more serious problem of "Electoral Fraud", preferring to focus on the lesser issue of "Voter Fraud".

        Absence of obvious "evidence" does not prove the absence of criminality-- there are significant irregularities in many American elections.
        (how many people here think the 2016 U.S. elections were totally honest and fair ??)

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Stephen T. Stone (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 6:49pm

          “President Trump … abruptly shut down a White House commission he had charged with investigating voter fraud, ending a brief quest for evidence of election theft that generated lawsuits, outrage and some scholarly testimony, but no real evidence that American elections are corrupt.” — The New York Times, 3 January 2018

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2019 @ 6:43am

          Re: Re: Electoral Fraud evidence

          OMG they asked for a source. Any source and you provided nothing. Not even the "few small studies". So now shut up or put up.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:24pm

      Re:

      The proper solution isn't just voter ID (all ballots should be mailed and only those official ballots accepted at the polls; No absentee ballots; No same-day registration) but also eliminating borders and the electoral college for federal elections. State reps should still only be "votable" by residents of those states but it doesn't matter if "NH voted for Soandso for president!". What matters is how many votes each candidate got. It's time to shed the archaic detritus saddling our voting system and move into the modern era.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      James Burkhardt (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:38pm

      Re:

      The number, 5,000 voters, is the number of same day voter registrations filed. That much is well documented. However, no evidence has been submitted to prove that all of these registrations were Clinton voters. Given that NC considers out of state College students eligible for voting, thousands of 18 year-olds could have easily moved to NC 2 months earlier and not registered to vote because they did not get a NC ID. Since lots of the "evidence" relates to these people not having NC DL/ID, a lot of the evidence that does exist doesn't actually prove voter fraud, but rather that the republican-instituted voter registration policies are operating as intended.

      Despite repeated calls and promises of an investigation, there has been no evidence presented that any significant amount of these registrations were fake. No evidence was found or presented of bussing or other widespread voter fraud.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:29pm

        Re: Re:

        I dearly hope that your college student theory is true, because then it means that Trump could say: "And I would have won the election too if not for those meddling kids!"

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          tom (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 8:22pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          But he did win the election. The question no one has been able to answer is: Did he win because of or in spite of the meddling of those Russian kids?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2019 @ 5:47am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I guess it depends upon your definition of "win the election".
            If you have to cheat in order to win, is it really considered a win?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            PaulT (profile), 25 Aug 2019 @ 1:15am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            He won because the system is so broken that it ignored the votes of over 3 million people in favour of a couple of small districts that voted a few thousand his way. Whether those votes were swayed by Russians or not is almost secondary to the fact that so many voters were disenfranchised due to their address.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              tom (profile), 26 Aug 2019 @ 6:27am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              The system isn't broken. The rules were well known to all concerned and have been in place since 1787. Hillary chose to campaign in California which by all accounts, she had wrapped up even with no campaigning. Her husband, Bill, the guy who had won 4 executive level campaigns, begged her in early October to campaign in many of those states where she lost by a few thousand votes. She ignored him and instead listened to her overpaid advisors. The rest is history.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • icon
                That One Guy (profile), 26 Aug 2019 @ 11:12am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                None of what you said changes the fact that roughly three million people might as well have filled out and then burned their votes for all the good those votes did thanks to the system in place, such that the candidate that actually got more votes by literal millions ended up losing.

                A system that is meant to reflect the will of the majority of voters and yet can have something like that happen is most certainly one that's got some serious problems.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • icon
                PaulT (profile), 27 Aug 2019 @ 1:19am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                You describe a system where millions of voters were essentially disenfranchised and the country has to depend on politicians playing specific games as "not broken". I respectfully disagree.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Some guy, 26 Aug 2019 @ 12:36pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              It's not broken and it didn't ignore anyone, it worked exactly like its supposed to. Now, the fact that California is grossly overpopulated but still only carries so many electoral college votes is the reason they appear to be ignored, but trust me, they were not, they just simply didn't matter because no matter how many people live in California they still only have so many electoral college votes and rightly so because the ppl of California dont share the same values that the rest of the country has and shouldn't be able or allowed to ever decide the fate of a nation that they purposely alienate themselves from just because they have more ppl in the state in welfare than all of the south had citizens combined. The electoral college is in place just so states like California and New York cant have more power than they deserve.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:44pm

      Re:

      Umm... this is actually pretty well-documented.

      Where?

      NH got "swung" to Hillary by a bunch of people from Massachusetts fraudulently registering with same-day voter registration as people who "had just moved to New Hampshire".

      Then why has no one presented such evidence before the FEC?

      Because they weren't residents and never had been. It's hard to reach any other conclusion than that the state was stolen by massive voter fraud

      For which no evidence has actually been presented. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

      You've bought into a myth.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:45pm

      this is actually pretty well-documented

      Then why aren’t you linking to the documentation?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 4:49pm

      Re:

      Funny when the truth does not equal the liberal narrative the article is hidden.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:03pm

    It was a well written letter.

    This may be a stupid question, so forgive me if it is. If the FEC has no power, why do they exist?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:33pm

      Re:

      If the FEC has no power, why do they exist?

      Wikipedia says "to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of [p]residential elections."

      It also says it's "made up of six members, who are appointed by the president of the United States....and at least four votes are required for any official commission action." But there are only 4 people; their terms all expired 6-12 years ago (all were appointed by Bush 2) and they haven't been replaced. One might conclude that the presidents since Bush have been trying to sabotage the agency.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    seedeevee (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:19pm

    Maybe these aren't the rubes you are looking for

    Still hunting the Great Red Russian Snark, Masnick?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Baron von Robber, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:28pm

    'his angry sycophantic fans (yes, I'm looking forward to the comments on this one)"

    I think few will show up.

    1) They have to look up "sycophantic"
    2) They have to figure out how to look up "sycophantic"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Thad (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:28pm

      Re:

      I remember we used to have one troll who loved saying "sycophantic".

      He didn't seem to think looking it up was a necessary part of the process.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Some guy, 26 Aug 2019 @ 1:03pm

        Re: Re:

        Right lol, and as if they themselves aren't the other side of the exact same silly coin. In my experience, hypocrites never actually think that they are hypocrites as much as they think they are heroes among they're own ilk. They love to call out ppl for exactly what they are guilty of.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Bloof (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:32pm

    It can't be Republican policies are unpopular and the party only propped up by gerrymandering and flyover states occupied by 20 people and a mule, Democrats winning the popular vote has to be fraud! It has to be people being willing to risk prosecution or deportation to do something designed to be as inconvenient and unrewarding as possible.

    Cue people linking to 'proof' of voter fraud, which is 55 and a half minutes into a two hour long youtube video of someone who never looks into the camera, citing studies that were discredited in the 1950s, speaking as fast as possible to make it hard for people to debate them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:37pm

    "Put up or shut up"

    That's not fair.

    He has nothing to put up, and he's so full of shit that if he stops spouting it for longer than five minutes, there'll be a 20kt explosion of shit that will level the White House.

    Please, think of the preservation of historical buildings before you ask him to shut up again.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:50pm

      Re: "Put up or shut up"

      The casino operator comment wasn't really fair either. He was never any good at that, given how often his casinos went bankrupt.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:17pm

        Re: Re: "Put up or shut up"

        To be fair, it did just say "former casino operator," which is true. It didn't say "successful former casino operator."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 6:01pm

          Re: Re: Re: "Put up or shut up"

          The phrase used was that a former casino operator should know "when you need to lay your cards on the table or fold."

          On the one hand, someone as bad at running a casino as Donald Trump might not, in fact, know what that phrase means.

          On the other hand, he has enough experience with the casinos themselves folding, so...

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Whoever, 23 Aug 2019 @ 2:54pm

    Undermined elections == poor turnout

    Our democracy depends on the American people's faith in our elections. Your voter-fraud allegations run the risk of undermining that faith.

    I believe that the intent of the voter fraud allegations is to undermine that faith, resulting in a depressed voter turnout, just like many, many other Republican actions.

    Republicans can only win elections if the Democrats don't turn out.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Thad (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:30pm

      Re: Undermined elections == poor turnout

      It's not simply a matter of undermining people's faith in institutions (though that's part of it); it's a justification for passing "voter fraud" laws that, by an astonishing coincidence, disproportionately affect Democratic voters.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:40pm

      Re: Undermined elections == poor turnout

      Republicans can only win elections if the Democrats don't turn out.

      Particularly since it looks bad if more votes have been cast than there are registered voters. The higher the voter turnout, the less opportunity for Russian votes to bolster the turnout numbers.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      earth resident, 24 Aug 2019 @ 12:47am

      Re: Undermined elections == poor turnout

      whoa....so spending the last two and a half years on the Russian collusion hoax did not undermine people's faith in our elections? LOLOLOLOL....uh ok

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2019 @ 5:50am

        Re: Re: Undermined elections == poor turnout

        Nothing to see, nothing to say?

        How are your three monkeys doing these days?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Thad (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 3:38pm

    Ah, conspiracy theories.

    Hillary Clinton organized a voter fraud campaign so massive that it included...what's Trump's latest claim? 15 million voters? Approximately one out of every twenty people in America?

    And so disciplined that not a single one of those 15 million illegal voters has actually come forward and admitted to it.

    And so incompetent that it focused on solid blue states like California, solid red states like Texas, and, apparently, swing states like New Hampshire with its 4 electoral votes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 4:03pm

      Yeah, this is exactly why conspiracy theories involving more than a handful of people are nigh-impossible to believe: Secrets leak, and the more people in on the secret tends to raise the probability of a leak occuring. If millions of people in multiple states were involved with a plan to defraud the 2016 presidential election, there is no chance in hell that all of them would stay quiet about it.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 5:53pm

        Re:

        This is something that everyone at large needs to be educated on. So many of these claims (not just regarding elections but social media bias, etc...) rely on hundreds, thousands, or millions of people being "in the know" and there's just no way that could be possible and not one single person come forward with concrete, indisputable, damning proof of it happening. I mean, even the government couldn't get away with spying on its own citizens for more than a few years before somebody spilled the beans.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 6:27pm

          Re: Re:

          Simple counter example to your thesis.

          There are millions of people that know Trump cannot function as an adult, much less be president. Yet no one has come forth with enough proof to have him impeached.

          QED

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Stephen T. Stone (profile), 23 Aug 2019 @ 6:39pm

            no one has come forth with enough proof to have him impeached

            Mueller made the gist of his report clear: Were it not for the fact that Donald Trump is the sitting president of the United States, he likely would have directed the Justice Department to indict Trump on obstruction charges. The only reason Trump has yet to be impeached lies within Congress — namely its cowardice, on both sides of the aisle and for various reasons, to start the impeachment process.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 8:39pm

              Re:

              indict Trump on obstruction charges

              This was all but confirmed during testimony. One of the Congressmen went through a few of the examples in the report and asked Mueller if it met the prongs of an obstruction charge. Mueller was answering yes on every prong for the first couple of questions until he went "I see what you did there" and started waving off the questions.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 8:42pm

              Re:

              "Stone": in put-up-or-shut-up piece you continue baseless claims

              1) "Obstruction" is always a prosecutor's last, desperate, most vague weapon, and Mueller didn't have enough for even that. Period.

              2) "Obstruction" is FAR more difficult to prove when are NO underlying charges. OBSTRUCTING WHAT, SONNY? STATE SPECIFIC.

              3) Going on muttering darkly without evidence is exactly what this piece is about. But LACK OF FACTS doesn't apply to YOU, right? -- It's utterly typical of Techdirt fanboys to A) accuse with ZERO facts, and B) to do exactly what accuse opponents of.

              4) In America, even YOUR political enemies are innocent until PROVEN guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. -- And don't just say you can still believe so: SHOW ME your basis other than claim Trump only got off because duly elected. SHOW JUST ONE SPECIFIC CHARGE, who, when, what, where. -- You can't, let alone enough to prove it in court. -- Without evidence, you are both crazy and lying.

              However, I do NOT say to you put-up-or-shut-up! Because serves my purpose for you and similar idiots to keep lying your heads off even after the baseles claims were investigated for two years by dedicated attack dog, 500 witnesses, and all could come up with was what you now CLING to: hint at "obstruction" without any actual charges that could have been obstructed.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 9:15pm

            Re: Re: Re:

            There are millions of people that know Trump cannot function as an adult, much less be president.

            That is an insult, not a factual statement backed up by evidence. Your counterpoint fails.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Stephen T. Stone (profile), 24 Aug 2019 @ 3:39am

              not a factual statement backed up by evidence

              To be fair, Trump himself provides all the evidence needed to back up that claim on a day-to-day basis.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 24 Aug 2019 @ 5:52am

            Re: Re: Re:

            "Yet no one has come forth with enough proof to have him impeached."

            Moscow Mitch might have something to say about your claim.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            PaulT (profile), 25 Aug 2019 @ 1:21am

            Re: Re: Re:

            "There are millions of people that know Trump cannot function as an adult, much less be president. Yet no one has come forth with enough proof to have him impeached"

            The issue isn't one of proof, the issue is that nobody wants President Pence, and anyone else who replaces him will be blamed for the inevitable implosion of the country that he's triggered. Best to let his senile ass stay in the seat for as long as possible so that he owns the damage he's done.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              John85851 (profile), 26 Aug 2019 @ 10:17am

              Re: Re: Re: Re:

              That's right- the issue comes down to what to do about Pence.
              So far, I don't believe he's done anything that could get him impeached... but no one wants him as president.
              But let's say Pelosi can start impeachment proceedings against Pence: the Republicans and the media would go nuts over the fact that a Democrat woman was trying to steal power from 2 Republican men!

              This is the same reason why Pelosi never started impeachment hearings against Bush and Cheney for their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: if it worked (which again, was probably a long shot), she'd become the first female president, but by a political process, not by getting elected.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        bob, 25 Aug 2019 @ 7:55am

        Re:

        Their OPSEC is so good I bet it makes all the governments jealous.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2019 @ 1:57am

        Manhattan project.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2019 @ 8:40pm

    innocuous leader

    because sometimes can't get in without such...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Glenn, 24 Aug 2019 @ 4:07am

    You can't "put up" what ain't there... and a fool will never "shut up".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 24 Aug 2019 @ 12:55pm

    There are a few ways to mess things up..

    I could explain Some of the methods used in the past.
    But They are trying to fix this behind the curtain.
    Picture ID, they didnt keep any Pictures at the DOT, until early 2000's.. Now its a huge data base.
    Anyone know about STAR ID?? you have to Prove who you are, and where you live.
    AND then we can add Facial ID...

    There are problems with all this. Unless all the states Join up and SHARE the pictures and residence, and use Facial ID at voter locations... It means nothing.
    there are a few reasons NOT to have ID...but they are enforcing this for everyone, EVERYONE... and they dont care if you Had good ID, and its expired they want it NEW/updated.

    And they are saying this is based on Terrorism. and I just cant see how this is going to stop anything. for a few reasons.
    A person from another nation can get a passport and other documentation, before they enter the USA...and use THAT as a proper ID.. How many locations KNOW how to look at a Passport and KNOW its real? and if every nation has their OWN, thats like looking at another nations money and deciding which one to use, Where...Not Easy.
    They keep reporting that Facial ID isnt working very well.. But in the past, they said they were doing very well.. But Who is looking at the Pictures?? Automated system?? SUCKS..
    Waiting for 3D pictures to help with this...And all the NEW ID we would all need to get AGAIN.
    Stores are going to hate all this.

    this is a Whole new business of creating a central location withall this data and ID, all connected to 1 location (sounds like Credit cards dont it)

    With all the lost Data and files on All of us, from Many locations. They already have problems Proving ID.. Your bank and Credit card corps...Love and hate this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      plank (profile), 24 Aug 2019 @ 6:02pm

      Re: There are a few ways to mess things up..

      This comment utilizes the same lexical quirk that I've noticed permeates the troll's Twitter feed. Strange capitalization of common nouns and verbs.

      I've thought about this usage and I guess it makes sense when needing to cram more information into the great nuance-eliminator that is Twitter. But when you have no restrictions on use of characters it really just makes you look either paranoid or like you don't understand how to use the English language.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2019 @ 6:55am

        Re: Re: There are a few ways to mess things up..

        Maybe it's a secret code. Have you looked to see if the random caps spell out words? hmm.... STIPPF Nope. Well that's failing so far. Any other ideas?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2019 @ 8:56am

    How about the 2+ years of Russiagate that has wasted millions that was complete B.S.!!! How about that!!! If anything, Hillary's hands are dirty.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2019 @ 9:53am

    "angry sycophantic fans" is the truest description of Trump's base I've ever read. (cue angry replies from said sycophants. Good luck.)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    John85851 (profile), 26 Aug 2019 @ 10:17am

    Trump

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    John85851 (profile), 26 Aug 2019 @ 10:20am

    Trump's response

    Trump's response... if he bothers to say anything:
    "Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have plenty of evidence and it's huge. The biggest evidence you've ever seen. Big evidence. In fact, it's right over here.
    Have you see what China is doing in the trade war? We need to build a wall to keep the brown people out of Texas or they'll make goods cheaper so I want American companies to stop using Chinese labor so Mexico will build the wall and help me buy Greenland because it's the best country for stopping immigration.
    Thank you"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.