Top Court Rules CETA's Lipstick-On-A-Pig Version Of Corporate Sovereignty Is Compatible With EU Law

from the it-may-be-legal,-but-is-it-moral? dept

Techdirt readers with good memories may recall the long saga of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). One important moment was when Canada agreed to use the EU's proposed replacement for corporate sovereignty, the Investor Court System (ICS). Both are versions of so-called "investor-state dispute settlement" (ISDS), which allows companies to sue countries for alleged losses caused by government decisions. Although ICS was devised in order to blunt the growing criticism of traditional ISDS, it amounts to little more than lipstick on a pig. It still gives foreign investors unique legal privileges not possessed by local companies. However, as part of the deal to persuade the Belgian region of Wallonia not to veto CETA, the EU agreed to allow Belgium to ask the region's top court to rule on whether the new ICS was compatible with EU law.

As is usual in such referrals, one of the top legal advisers of the Court of the Justice of the European Union (CJEU) offered a preliminary opinion. In this case, Advocate General Yves Bot found that the ICS was compatible with EU law. The main CJEU has now issued its own judgment (pdf), essentially agreeing with Bot on every point. The key ruling is that, according to the CJEU, the ICS won't be able to overturn EU decisions:

the CETA contains provisions that deprive those [ICS] tribunals of any power to call into question the choices that have been democratically made within a Party to that agreement in relation to, inter alia, the level of protection of public order or public safety, the protection of public morals, the protection of health and life of humans and animals or the preservation of food safety, protection of plants and the environment, welfare at work, product safety, consumer protection or, equally, fundamental rights. Consequently, that agreement does not adversely affect the autonomy of the EU legal order.

That seems a little naive. It may be true, from a strictly legal point of view, but it ignores the reality of the situation. Even if the ICS cannot force an EU Member State to amend its laws, or change its decisions, it can impose fines for the "losses" an investor may suffer because of those moves. In such cases, a government may decide that it would rather repeal the law or cancel its decision than pay hundreds of millions of euros in fines. Even the threat of losing may be enough to convince governments to back down -- exactly as has happened many times with traditional ISDS. However, the Stop ISDS campaign points out:

The case against ISDS (or its rebranded version ICS) has never been primarily a legal one. It is a moral one.

ISDS allows multinational companies access to an obscure, parallel justice system closed to the rest of us. Calling it a court system for the 1% would be generous. It is really a court system for the 0.01%.

ISDS has allowed corporate interests to trump those of the public time and time again. Countries have been threatened for passing pollution regulations, approving health and safety measures and for hitting the pause button on fracking. It has been used to defend land grabs, environmental destruction and lock in privatisation of key public services.

None of these arguments depend on the opinion of the ECJ. The moral case is as strong as ever -- ISDS must go.

That's not a hopeless aspiration. As Techdirt reported earlier this year, the EU has already announced that corporate sovereignty claims can no longer be brought over internal EU matters. Meanwhile, the US seems to be cooling on the idea. So while the ICS has been blessed by the CJEU, it may be that corporate sovereignty is on the way out anyway.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter, Diaspora, or Mastodon.

Filed Under: canada, ceta, cjeu, corporate sovereignty, ics, investor court system, isds


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2019 @ 11:46pm

    Wait, what?

    The EU and Canada are giving in to the opinion of bots now?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2019 @ 3:17pm

      Re: Wait, what?

      Nope. They just rendered themselves irrelevant as an authority. As they and the people they just sold out will discover in the coming years.

      Corporate fascism: Coming soon to a country near you, because humanity forgot the lessons of the Dark Ages.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    any moose cow word, 3 May 2019 @ 3:38am

    This is one of the many reasons democrats need to be thoughtful about the candidate they run against Trump. Many that are in, or aspire to be in, the party's inner circle will undoubtedly redouble their efforts to slide in more ISDS provisions than Trump or Obama, as the party donors are very keen on regaining the ground they lost.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 3 May 2019 @ 10:30am

    USA pharma and others..

    In the USA, the pharma corps HATE Canada.. A company can be up there and make Generic drugs and the Major corp CANT pick on them. Cant run them into court and demand money or anything else...NOW they can.

    The RIAA/MPAA/and the software developer corps in the USA hate that the Copyright laws in Canada arnt the SAME as in the USA.. They consider Canada the WORST on a long list of Countries they want to step on, and FORCE the USA CR laws..

    So many companies LOVE the USA laws, and make their home here, but the parts and products are shipped from other nations. Why dont they GO and live in those other nations, I wonder..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    JudgeDredd, 3 May 2019 @ 3:11pm

    If you ever wondered how the Judges began as a post nuclear war organization, this is how. I have a bridge in Mega City 17 for sale, real cheap. Txt me.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    AnonyOps, 3 May 2019 @ 3:14pm

    Top Arbitration Lawyer Says Corporate Sovereignty System Needs 'Complete Overhaul'

    Say That Again
    from the weapons-of-legal-destruction dept
    Thu, May 15th 2014 12:37am — Glyn Moody

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140514/07132927231/top-arbitration-lawyer-says-corporate-s overeignty-system-needs-complete-overhaul.shtml

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2019 @ 4:52pm

    NOTICE!

    Those consumers located in the European Union, effective 5/24/2018 due to the GDPR, citizens of any GDPR applicable country or anyone sitting in, or operating from, such country are prohibited from using this site. Read our Terms of Service to learn more. By using our site you understand and agree to these terms. Don't blame us... blame Europe!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.