FCC (Read: Taxpayers) Forced To Pay Journalist's Legal Bills After Tap Dancing Around FOIA Requests

from the nothing-to-see-here dept

You may or may not remember that FCC boss Ajit Pai promised to operate the "most transparent" FCC ever. Initially, Pai lived up to that promise by changing FCC policy so that FCC orders would be released before they were voted on; a pretty obvious improvement of benefit to both consumers and ISP lobbyists alike. But in the year or two since, Pai has shown that genuine transparency is the very least of the chairman's priorities.

For example, Pai's FCC has actively refused to aid law enforcement inquiries into who was behind the millions of bogus comments that polluted the net neutrality repeal public comment period. Similarly, the Pai FCC's general response to FOIA requests has been to stall, delay, and ignore said requests whenever possible, resulting in numerous lawsuits by media outlets attempting to get to the bottom of all manner of bizarre FCC policy decisions (like that fake DDOS attack emails show they made up to try and downplay public anger over the net neutrality repeal).

One of those lawsuits was filed by journalist Jason Prechtel, whose analysis recently helped shed some light on the telecom and Trump-linked organizations who stuffed the FCC ballot box during the net neutrality public comment period -- in some cases using stolen identities. The Pai FCC repeatedly ignored or stalled in response to Prechtel's FOIA requests regarding this data, so he sued the agency back in 2017. Last week, a court ruled that the FCC (read: taxpayers) will be forced to reimburse Prechtel's legal costs to the tune of $43,000.

As Gizmodo notes, it was probably money well spent if integrity and transparency actually matter to you:

"The data Prechtel ultimately obtained through the case formed the basis of a Gizmodo report last month—which he coauthored—that revealed how investigators had linked various entities, including a prominent Washington, D.C., publication, to potentially millions of fraudulent comments submitted during the 2017 net neutrality rollback.

The same data was previously withheld from law enforcement investigators by the FCC’s top lawyer citing jurisdictional and privacy concerns. Prechtel eventually obtained it under FOIA from a separate agency."

The settlement formally settles the dispute, though the FCC denies any wrongdoing. Still, numerous state AGs, the GAO, and the FBI are all investigating those bogus comments filed during the net neutrality repeal, and have subpoenaed several of the ISP-linked organizations Prechtel's data helped identify as the culprits. As such, this singular FOIA dispute is just one small part of a much larger, weirder story that still hasn't been fully told.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ajit pai, comments, fcc, foia, jason prechtel, net neutrality, transparency

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • icon
    Gary (profile), 25 Mar 2019 @ 12:31pm


    An open and free press is an important cornerstone of Democracy. If the press doesn't expose government malfeasance, who will?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Toom1275 (profile), 25 Mar 2019 @ 1:48pm

    Some notes taken from last month's article:

    The investigation focused around a distinctively-phrased pile of dogshit -- that NN was [paraphrased as I neglected to copy the original into my notes] "a conspiracy between TechLeft Google and globalist (((George Soros))) that does the opposite of what it says."

    That language was found in at least 6-800,000 identical comments.

    The above language was first squirted out by Christie-Lee McNally. CM is a former GOP executive, was the statewide Trump campaign director for Maine, is the executive of Raven Strategies, a political consulting firm use by the Trump campaign, the president of the astroturf group "Free Our Internet," and runs another front group called "Net Freedom Ring."

    The claims naturally bounced their way around the right-wing echo chamber - Breitbart, Infowars, StormFront, DailyCaller, and the less-reputable places. They were also parroted by Roger Stone.

    Ethan Elion, who runs another political consulting firm called Vertical Strategies, is also on the board of some anti-NN astroturfing groups of his own, called "Protect Internet Freedom" and "Don't Tread on the Net" -- hosted on the same servers as other GOP PACs.

    It was found that while the uploader of the dogshit-filled fake comments above tried to obscure their identity, their submissions all had the distinctive filename structure of FOI.csv (Free Our Internet)

    On the other side, legitimate bulk filers like Fight for the Future identified themselves normally.

    For reference - astroturfers named above already:
    "Free Our Internet"
    "Net Freedom Ring"
    "Protect Internet Freedom"
    "Don't Tread on the Net"

    Other groups:
    "Center for Individual Freedom" - much like the Heartland Institute, created to be tobacco industry shills, now continues to operate on corporate dark money

    "The National Hispanic Fund" has accepted large amounts of money from front group "Broadband for America"

    Another doublespeak name - "Taxpayer Protection Alliance"

    One final note - Ajit Pai has links to several of these fake-comment-making sham groups.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2019 @ 5:35pm

    Better get on damage control, Richard Bennett.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 26 Mar 2019 @ 1:06pm

    And now..

    we will never hear anything else about these facts..
    Why is it that WE, Pay for these ?mistakes? when it wasnt OURS, it was a personal thing more then any other..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)


Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.