Free

by Tim Cushing


Filed Under:
foia, freedom of information



If You Want The Government To Hand Over Documents, You Might Want To Retain A Lawyer

from the get-busy-suing-or-get-busy-waiting dept

Fifty years after the passage of the Freedom of Information Act, the letter of the law lives on but its spirit has been crushed. While it's definitely preferable to having no opportunity to demand government agencies hand over requested documents, it's not the significant improvement it was promised to be.

As was noted here four years ago, the government has pretty much adopted a presumption of opacity that necessitates the filing of lawsuits. This contradicts the law's intentions, as well as proclamations made by President Obama, who declared his administration the "most transparent." This assertion fell flat when government agencies engaged in FOIA business as usual and Obama did nothing to hold them accountable.

If you really want the government to turn over documents, you have two choices: lawyer up or add your pending FOIA requests to your will. That is the sad reality of the situation, as C.J. Ciaramella of Reason points out.

If you don't have the money to lawyer up, you'll have to content yourself with waiting months, and often years, for documents. The average time to receive a processed FOIA request from the State Department in fiscal year 2017 was 652 days, for example. The average time to receive a response to an administrative appeal was 503 days.

And that's just the stats for one agency. The FOIA Project has compiled the stats for this year's FOIA requests and found there are more requests being filed than ever before, leading to the inevitable outcome of more FOIA lawsuits being filed than ever before.

The annual rate of filed lawsuits has more than doubled under President Trump. So far this year, 860 lawsuits have been filed, compared to 402 filed in 2016. This presidency has triggered renewed interest in the FOIA process, resulting in waves of requests hitting agencies like the DOJ and DHS, as well as agencies (EPA, HHS) whose top officials have been caught behaving badly.

Rather than greet the demand with increased supply, government agencies have stayed the course they've held for the last 50 years. While there have been some welcome introductions like online filing portals and release-to-all policies for documents with significant public interest, the rate of incoming requests continues to exceed the capacity to fulfill them. But no money will be thrown to FOIA response teams. This is a part of the government that the government tends to feel can remain underserved forever.

If you want to know how bad it is, the FOIA Project has a set of data tools that allow you to sort the data to see who's screwing requesters most often, based on the number of times they've been taken to court. (Unsurprisingly, the FBI has been sued most often, including this recent filing from Buzzfeed's Jason Leopold over documents related to the agency's investigation of sexual assault complaints against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.)

If there's any bright side to this, it's that the apparent need to lawyer up when seeking documents is no longer (mostly) a corporate playground. Having unlimited access to in-house lawyers has turned the FOIA process into a research tool for corporations seeking an edge on competitors or simply fishing for info other companies might want to keep secret, but the government is more than happy to dispense to whoever asks.

In FY 2018, nonprofits comprised 56 percent of all FOIA lawsuits brought against the government. Nonprofits became increasingly active under the Obama Administration, but emerged as the majority of all FOIA lawsuit plaintiffs after President Trump took office. In FY 2016, nonprofit filers comprised just 36 percent of plaintiffs, whereas they comprised 50 percent or more in FY 2017 and FY 2018 (see previous report, “FOIA Suits Filed by Nonprofit/Advocacy Groups Have Doubled Under Trump”). Suits filed by reporters and news organizations also have been increasing.

The Freedom of Information Act is limping towards its sixth decade of existence, better than nothing, but nothing near what it was imagined it would become. Reform efforts continue to fail, largely due to government agency interference and pressure. Five decades of this has turned the FOIA process into a battle of wills that almost always takes place in a federal courtroom. Despite this, more FOIA requests are being filed than ever -- perhaps a testament to the indomitable American spirit… or an almost-masochistic unwillingness to take "no" for an answer.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    discordian_eris (profile), 16 Nov 2018 @ 1:11pm

    This is one of the saddest stories I have ever seen on TD. Not on TDs part, on the governments part. In this day and age, FOIA requests should be able to be fulfilled quickly and easily compared to when it first passed. That it takes so long, and more importantly, typically requires a federal lawsuit is just.... pathetic. I'd say that the government agencies should be ashamed of themselves. However, as they have amply demonstrated over the years, the government employees are incapable of that feeling.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      pegr, 16 Nov 2018 @ 4:06pm

      All public docs belong to the people

      All public docs should be posted to public archives immediately. All sensitive docs should have a built-in “make public” date.


      Government secrecy encourages bad behavior.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Nemo (profile), 17 Nov 2018 @ 11:37pm

    Data point: The fact that request went up since the election of Trump is not evidence of a shift in gov't policy/behavior, so much as it is of people and/or groups of people looking for ways to topple him.

    Maybe that was discussed later on, but that on top of the extremely unclear reference to 2017 wait times (clearly, there is no confirmed wait time of over 600 days for anything filed in '17, coupled with the similar claim about appeals confuses things beyond my willingness to compensate for others' laziness.

    And yes, TechDirt, that last includes you. If such anomalies are not explained in the course of an article you quoted, you had best point that out, and if they do, the same applies with immediately quoting or at least explaining the context provided.

    This isn't rocket surgery, folks. It's just math, and addition/subtraction-level math, at that.

    And it isn't that I couldn't look it up, and figure it out - it's that y'all dumped that load on me when your quoted block added the undefined anomaly.

    Don't get me wrong, this isn't burning an original copy of the Constitution-level bad, but do everyone a favor, folks, and tighten up on this sort of thing, willya?

    There's far too much sloppy prose out there, and this sort of faux pas is easily avoided. And besides, quoting things out of context is a journalistic no-no. Even "no harm, no foul" instances of it are to be even more stringently than using the passive voice. ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.