ISU Student Groups Changing Names En Masse To Protest School's Ridiculous New Trademark Policy
from the no-pride-allowed dept
You will recall that over the past few years, we have been discussing how Iowa State University essentially did everything wrong concerning an alumni group running a pro-marijuana organization that made use of school symbols and iconography. After initially approving the group’s use of school trademarks, several members of the state’s conservative legislature got involved, leading to the school rescinding that authorization. NORML, the name of the group, sued the school, claiming all of this was a violation of their free speech rights. The courts agreed, eventually to the tune of a $600k judgement, meaning that school wasted over half a million dollars of taxpayer money to fail at trademark bullying.
You might have expected that this would serve as a delightful education for the school as to the reasons why they don’t want to be a trademark bully. You would be wrong, of course. Instead, the school’s next step was to immediately rewrite its trademark use policy, making it laughably restrictive and essentially attempting to give the school broad oversight over all uses of its iconography by student groups. This, predictably, has led to a full on revolt both by many of the school’s student organizations and its student government.
To start with the student organizations, they are largely dropping ISU connections from their name and branding like a hot stone.
A year ago, Iowa State University’s student chess club was easily tied to the university through its name. Now, it’s the Ames Collegiate Chess Club. The student aviation group had been the Flying Cyclones. Now, they’re the Ames Flyers. And the student space club, which had had “Iowa State” in its name, is Ames Space Teaching and Recognition Association.
Why the changes? University administrators over the summer tightened Iowa State’s trademark policy by limiting most student organizations’ access to trademarked references to the institution.
As noted elsewhere in the post, ISU has a habit of puffing its chest out over its large roster of student-led organizations and clubs. Yet, because of its heavy-handed new policy, those ties to the university are being severed, taking those bragging rights away. Where ISU once could be seen as having a rich tradition of clubs and organizations reveling in student participation, a separation line has now been drawn. All because the school wants to choose control over culture.
And the students are pissed.
The policy so riled student government members that they unanimously approved a resolution this week requesting the administration, at least temporarily, backpedal from the guidelines that were posted Aug. 1 on ISU’s Trademark Licensing Office website.
“The administration went about this poorly,” Michael Tupper, an ISU student government member, said at this week’s meeting. “They implemented the change in the middle of the summer, when there were no students on campus.”
In addition, Tupper said during the meeting, “We’ve been told multiple times that the change was not in direct result to the lawsuit. … That is not true.”
A school spokesperson states that the school will review the resolution and then meet with the student government, but it’s painfully obvious that it would rather have avoided student interaction altogether through sheer timing. Making such a policy change where the primary effect will be felt by student groups when students weren’t even on campus isn’t particularly subtle. Meeting with the student government now is CYA, not some kind of olive branch. And that’s likely why the student government is not screwing around here.
Some at this week’s student government meeting suggested that if university officials don’t follow through on any requests in the resolution, other actions could be taken, including votes of no confidence or censure.
It’s a problem entirely of ISU’s own making. And, given the culture that is supposed to be fostered on college campuses, this is about as wholly unnecessary as it gets. As entertaining as it is watching an institution like ISU learn absolutely all the wrong lessons from a well-publicized trademark dispute, it has to be just as frustrating for the students on campus.
Filed Under: student groups, students, trademark, trademark bully
Companies: iowa state university
Comments on “ISU Student Groups Changing Names En Masse To Protest School's Ridiculous New Trademark Policy”
The kids are alright.
ISU is now the school that must not be named.
Re: Re:
How many Horcruxes do you think it has?
Re: Re: Re:
One more than they intended to create after the trademark curse, Ihava Trademarka, rebounded upon them…
(Do you think Warner Bros. will take notice if we drop any more thinly veiled references?)
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Pretty sure those are not thinly veiled references; they’re just references.
Uhmmm… ICU’s trademark policy shall not pass!
(… darn it, wrong source material)
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
It’s just a flesh wound!
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
ISU Aerospace Engineering: The Wright Stuff!
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
What is the colour of the ISU logo?
Red! No! Blue! Aaaaugh!
What are the students learning from this experience?
… Those in charge lie and are not to be trusted, this is the lesson although I’m not sure that was intended.
Is it too late....
They should have just changed their names to I Sue Space Teaching and Recognition Association, etc.
The blow-back is probably made even worse by the state legislature’s interference, and the fact that they were trying to censor a pro-marijuana group.
You’re not going to find too many college students who feel strongly that marijuana should be kept illegal, and that number is only going to get smaller overtime. Marijuana prohibitions have already lost, they just haven’t admitted it yet.
For anyone else asking "Why 'Ames'?"
I had to look it up, but ISU is located in Ames, IA.
students have power at the university?
What does the student government group mean in the last quote? What power does it actually have and how would their vote of no confidence or censure do anything?
When I went to a school the student government didn’t actually have any power so is this situation different?
They were called the student representative council or SRC. I always just referred to them as the student resume contribution organization because it only really gave you something that looks impressive to add to your resume.
Re: students have power at the university?
They try and act all powerful when wagging their fingers at other students for silly violations of the student code of conduct … who writes these things anyways?
I love initialisms.
“Ames Space Teaching and Recognition Association”
A.S.T.R.A.
They’re alright in my book.
Stupid facts of every nation..
Lets see..
There is this group, that group and the other group..
Liberal, conservative and dont give a spit..
How is it that Even if this is a lopsided balance here…that 1 group has a BIG MOUTH, and gets its way??
IMO, I cant see how any of them got more then 1/3 of the people, unless they hired out and called in recruits..
Student Government is Like Unto Passing Gas in a Hurricane
Student government normally has no actual power as to the operations of the school. It does, often, assist in deciding how to dole out student activity fees to student groups, but cannot set the level of fees. Of course it has no effect on hiring, firing, or advancement of administrators.
So, when the student representatives threaten a vote of no confidence or censure, that means that perhaps the student newspaper will report the result. The actual effect is readily ignored.
Of course, since I am out of their state, I do not expect that my comment will have any more effect on ISU administration than a student vote of no confidence.