More Comic Conventions Change Their Names After Crazy SDCC Attorney's Fees And Injunction Ruling

from the what's-in-a-name? dept

We were just talking about the odd ruling that came down in which the court overseeing the trademark dispute between the San Diego Comic-Con and the former Salt Lake Comic Con somehow awarded $4 million in attorney's fees, despite the jury award for trademark infringement amounting only to $20k. In addition to the award of attorney's fees, Judge Battaglia also issued an injunction barring the Salt Lake show from calling itself any variation of the term "comic con" but, oddly, refused to issue a similar injunction barring it from calling itself a "comic convention." As we noted at the time, it's plainly absurd that the "vention" difference there is doing that much heavy lifting in the court's mind.

But the reverberations of the ruling are now being felt throughout the country, with one company that puts on many comic conventions doing sweeping name changes for many of its shows.

Tampa Bay Comic Con has changed its name to Tampa Bay Comic Convention. The change comes less than two weeks after a federal judge in California ordered organizers of Salt Lake Comic Con to pay nearly $4 million in attorneys’ fees and costs to San Diego Comic Convention in a trademark infringement suit.

Tampa Bay Comic Con co-founder Stephen Solomon, a manager at Imaginarium, the company that has run Tampa Bay Comic Con and similarly-branded comic conventions around the U.S. since 2010, confirmed the name change Wednesday after re-branded images appeared on the convention’s social media. Solomon declined to comment on whether that ruling had anything to do with the Tampa Bay Comic Con name change.

He can decline to comment on that all he wants, but it's pretty plain what is going on here. Those putting on other comic conventions throughout the country have been keeping a watchful eye on the fight between SLCC and SDCC. With this enormous award of attorney's fees after such a paltry judgement, convention organizers are simply doing the math and realizing that even if they convince a jury that its infringement isn't willful in the future, they can still get slammed with attorney's fees. They also likely know that after the ruling on the injunction that prevents SLCC from using any variation of the "comic con" term, the SDCC is surely coming for them next. And, so, they unilaterally disarm.

It's at this point that I will insist again on pointing out how absurd every last bit of this is. To allow "comic con" to be a trademarkable term, but to admit that "comic convention" is not because of its descriptive nature, is so silly as to make one's head hurt. For millions of dollars to be exchanged because of the difference between those two terms, all on the pretense that the public is somehow confused as to whether the SDCC is in charge of all of these conventions, is crazy-pants. For the result of all of this to be tens or hundreds of other conventions proactively changing their generic names to slightly more generic names is downright infuriating.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: comic con, comic convention, comicon, trademark
Companies: san diego comic-con


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 11 Sep 2018 @ 1:06am

    Because those in comic fandom would never take offense to 1 asshat & punish them.

    What if SD gave a ComicCon and no one came?
    Think all the studios would bother using an empty event has a place to launch teasers & exclusive content?

    Fandom's really need to stop thinking someone else will deal with the problems. If you find what SDCC did horrible, skip a year. Be loud about why you are skipping. I hear there is an awesome Comics Convention in Salt Lake & hey no california traffic & jacked up prices!

    This was a stupid fight, before a Judge of questionable intelligence, so 1 asshole could threaten events across the country people attend.

    Why would any of the fans accept some asshole deciding he owns a common phrase?
    Boycott SDCC, be loud that as long as it is run by an asshole who thinks ComicCon belongs only to him its gonna be a very empty space in SD.

    But then Nintendo has a history of abusing their fans who keep showing up asking to get screwed over once again.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.