HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

Disney Gets Early Loss In Trademark, Copyright Suit Against Unlicensed Birthday Party Characters

from the knock-it-off-knockoffs dept

Late last year, we discussed a lawsuit brought by Disney against Characters For Hire, a small company that sends costume characters to children's birthday parties. Those characters, as we said at the time, are barely-altered clear homages to storied Disney-owned characters, such as Dark Lord (Dearth Vader) and Big Hairy Guy (sigh, Chewbacca). While Disney sued over both trademark and copyright, the alterations to the characters and the very clear disclaimer Characters For Hire puts on its site and documents meant the chances for confusion as to Disney's affiliation was always non-existent. When you add that the changes in the characters and the medium in which they were offered at least partially put us in the idea/expression dichotomy zone for copyright law. That part of the law essentially says copyright applies to specific expressions (written stories, film, music, and sometimes characters), but not general ideas (a Dark Lord, a, sigh, Big Hairy Guy).

Well, nearly a year later, the first legal returns have come in and they are not great for Disney.

On Thursday, a New York federal judge refused to grant summary judgment in favor of Disney in its ongoing case against Nick Sarelli, alleged to run a "knock-off business ... built upon the infringement of Plaintiffs' highly valuable intellectual property rights."

What's more, U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels threw out most of Disney's trademark claims against a defendant who will send out individuals dressed as "The Princess" (meaning Leia) or "Big Hairy Guy" (meaning Chewbacca) for special events.

Daniels recognizes some similarity, but isn't buying that Disney and Sarelli compete in the same business nor that Sarelli's customers are likely to be confused. The judge makes the point that it's "adults, not children" who plan parties and there's no evidence of actual confusion.

This is roughly as predicted in our original post. The trademark claims were far less likely to succeed due to all the steps Characters For Hire took to explicitly make sure that the public wasn't confused when buying from it. Disney's evidence mostly amounted to customer reviews for the Characters For Hire that occasionally referenced the original characters being paid homage, but the judge found that even in those comments there was nothing indicating confusion. Instead, it seemed that parents knew full well they were buying so-called knockoffs, making the trademark claims unwarranted. The only trademark claim that survives for trial, if it gets that far, will be for dilution.

The court also refused summary judgement for the copyright portion of Disney's claims, noting that Disney's lawyers presented for evidence poor-quality screenshots of Characters For Hire's website, including screenshots of site pages no longer active, but which were instead grabbed from the Internet Archive. The copyright claims, however, will go to trial, assuming Disney lets it get that far after these early losses.

The more likely outcome is that a settlement will be reached. With so little left to argue, Disney surely can't want to throw money for lawyer's fees just to keep some kids from having fun at their birthday parties... can it?


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 15 Aug 2018 @ 1:37pm

    "With so little left to argue, Disney surely can't want to throw money for lawyer's fees just to keep some kids from having fun at their birthday parties... can it?"

    I find your lack of faith... disturbing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      JoeCool (profile), 15 Aug 2018 @ 2:48pm

      Re:

      Like any big company, Disney has its own staff of lawyers that have to justify their salary. When there's no big cases, they FIND ANYTHING to look busy and keep their cushy jobs.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Gary (profile), 15 Aug 2018 @ 1:49pm

    Oh no, but Disney popularized cartoons so they have a *right* to all cartoon based licensing! /s

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 15 Aug 2018 @ 1:59pm

    (Dearth Vader)

    All hail the great and wise autocorrupt.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Another Anonymous Coward, 15 Aug 2018 @ 2:03pm

    More likely, they fold so that a loss won't interfere with their bullying.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 15 Aug 2018 @ 3:46pm

    How many?

    Books, Magazines, RPG Paper games, and Computer games...
    NOW, need to discuss things with Disney to get products out for the Major series, that Disnay(I spelled it right) has bought in the recent past...and in the last 20 years..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Agammamon, 15 Aug 2018 @ 8:05pm

    *sigh*

    You'd think Disney could afford to hire lawyers that know the difference between trademark and copyright.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Aug 2018 @ 12:05am

    I knew a guy once that used to offer hot big breasted girls for bachelor parties, but got in trouble with the “neighborhood watch” community that identified him and forced him to change his business model. So, he bought new costumes for his girls, depicting Disney characters, and changed his market target to children’s birthday parties. It turns out kids like big breasted women as much as anyone else.

    Well, when Disney learned about it, they sued it, and it took a long time to resolve. During that time, my ever creative friend struck a deal with Disney, eventually securing exclusive rights to provide Disney birthday party services with big breasted ladies in return for a small royalty, and now he is richer than ever.

    My point is that sometimes good things happen when you least expect it, if you are open to positive outcomes.

    On the other hand, if your mission is only to grouse and complain, things seldom (if ever) get better.

    Be open to happiness and it will find you.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 16 Aug 2018 @ 1:36am

      Re:

      I see your attempt at snark and raise you to a citation needed.

      I'd ask you for a name of such a service to know that it exists, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Aug 2018 @ 12:04pm

    Those damned birthday parties are stealing our intellectual properties!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2018 @ 10:29am

    A loss for Disney is a win for the Internet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.