Trademark

by Timothy Geigner


Filed Under:
cease and desist, fans, harry potter

Companies:
warner bros



Warner Bros. Turns Harry Potter Fan Events Into Events For The Franchise That Must Not Be Named

from the trademarka-kedavra dept

It's always a weird look for companies and IP owners to go after clear expressions of fandom from their customers. And, yet, this sort of thing is done often, with fan get-togethers or festivals regularly being threatened by the IP owners they're fans of. Often times we hear the usual nonsense trademark law excuse that fans must be served with cease and desist letters, or sued, or else the trademark owner will lose its rights. That, as we've discussed repeatedly, is not true, as there are other options available to the trademark holder besides threatening fans.

Warner Bros. has many of the rights to the Harry Potter franchise and the company has not been shy in the past about firing off threat letters to fan groups and festivals. Previously, Warner Bros. has claimed that it only abused fans in this way if there was a commercial aspect to the events. Even under that policy, the legal team for the studio was, shall we say, imperfect. But Warner Bros. has apparently had something of a policy shift that is causing it to go after far more of these fan events, causing Potter fans everywhere frustration and anger.

"It's almost as if Warner Bros. has been taken over by Voldemort, trying to use dark magic to destroy the light of a little town," said Sarah Jo Tucker, a 21-year-old junior at Chestnut Hill College, which hosts a Quidditch tournament that coincides with the annual suburban Philadelphia festival.

Philip Dawson, Chestnut Hill's business district director, said Warner Bros. reached out to his group in May, letting them know new guidelines prohibit festivals' use of any names, places or objects from the series. That ruled out everything from meet-and-greet with Dumbledore and Harry to Defense Against the Dark Arts classes.

"It was very quickly apparent (we) weren't going to be able to hold festivals like years past," he said. The late October festival drew about 45,000 fans last year to the historic neighborhood's cobblestone streets. This year, they will instead have a "wands and wizards" family night and pub crawl and other magic-themed events — and people can still dress as their favorite characters.

As the AP notes, this policy shift is causing these notices to go out to festivals all over the country, each time stating that new policies prohibit this sort of fan-fun at local festivals. As is often the case, Warner Bros. is claiming that trademark law requires it to take these exact actions. Again, this is not true. The studio has many other options, including offering a cheap license to the festivals to allow the fun to go on while having them be officially sanctioned. That it chose not to pursue that course means that Warner Bros. is squarely more interested in being a legal bully than it is in allowing fans of its franchise to celebrate their fandom.

It's an especially stupid track to take, given that these organic fan festivals are certainly in some part responsible for propelling the Potter franchise to the stardom it has now achieved.

Philadelphia Potter fan Sarah McIntyre thinks it's ridiculous for Warner Bros. to target the festivals.

"They are acting like the Dursleys," said the 34-year-old yoga teacher and bookkeeper. She said they should be encouraging communities to bring Harry Potter to life. "Creating interest in the franchise would increase revenue," she said.

How this is not obvious to the folks at Warner Bros. is beyond me. The studio ought to want people talking about the franchise as widely as possible and it's hard to see how fan events at local festivals would do anything other than cause new potential consumers of the franchise to generate some interest in it. As the AP takes pains to note, Warner Bros. is certainly within its rights here, or is at least likely so. But that doesn't make this is a smart business decision, never mind the most optimal outcome for its franchise. Instead, it comes off as purely unfriendly to fans, which is just not a good look for an entertainment product.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 3:31pm

    Re: Re: End Results

    Interesting idea, though a short shelf life (due to the raw eggs), and while it might be considered buttery, eggnog does not traditionally contain butter, which might wind up in truth in labeling court. Damned laws.

    It would work for a festival though, if said festival didn't interrupt some corporate wanker's concept of promotion.

    Part the the problem is that butter melts at body temperature, and coagulates at anything colder. So butter beer, conceivably, would have lumps of butter in it, and that does not make like a satisfying drink. Now if butter beer were served hot, it might make a difference. Though there was a restaurant that used cold Hollandaise (a butter and egg emulsion, though warm, not hot) along with raw scallops to simulate eggs sunny side up. What can I say, it was the 70's, they also had a chocolate rabbit dish.

    As an aside, one of the differences between butter and margarine is the melting point. Butter will melt at normal human body temperatures. Margarine will not. Therefore, if you have a film on your tongue after tasting something, it was likely margarine, rather than butter. Myself, I use olive oil as much as possible (unless the flavor is conflicting with the intended result) and butter only when it is necessary for the end product (heart conditions have some precedent), and then only sweet (unsalted) butter. On the other hand, I have used a 50-50 mixture of clarified (water and solids removed by melting and then chilling, and then physically separating the fat from the dregs) which give flavor, and a decreased melting point, but an increased smoke point. Any oil, butter, margarine, olive oil, corn oil, etc. will achieve a smoke point, and shortly thereafter an ignition point where the oil will self combust. The smoke point is good, generally it means the oil is ready for cooking, but it is short lived, the combustion point is shortly thereafter. It is not always necessary to achieve the smoke point for cooking, but it is beneficial in some cases.

    I should mention that the only way to put out such an oil fire is to remove the oxygen. This might be done by putting a lid on the pan, or with copious amounts of salt, not usually available in a home kitchen, or with the appropriate fire extinguisher. Water will not only not work, but will make the problem worse. DON'T USE WATER.


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.