President Trump Directs Pentagon To Create A 'Space Force' In What Is Surely Not Any Kind Of Distraction From Crying Children

from the three-card-donnie dept

You may recall that about this time last year, the House of Representatives put together a budget that included funding for a brand new military branch dubbed the Space Force. At the time, our take is that this was always inevitable, as humanity tends to carry its war-making luggage everywhere we go and, since we go to space, we're going to have a Space Force. More surprising was the pushback from those who have a thing or two to say about military matters, such as Secretary of Defense James Mattis, who noted that setting up a new military branch was hellishly complicated, and required congressional approval.

Mattis, in a letter to Rep. Mike Turner -- an Ohio Republican leading the congressional effort against the Space Corps -- said he was opposed to adding "additional organizational and administrative tail" to the Pentagon.

"At a time when we are trying to integrate the Department's joint warfighting functions, I do not wish to add a separate service that would likely present a narrower and even parochial approach to space operations," Mattis wrote.

One can read that as government-speak for: "No, this is stupid, why are you proposing this, everything is going fine, hey, is this thing even on?" Currently, space-based operations for the military are headed up by the Air Force Space Command. There is no denying that orbital operations are critical to the success of the United States military, given all of the satellite assets currently floating around the near-inky void. There has also been no indication that the Air Force is not up to the job, given the current lack of space-based infantry skirmishes or ground (ahem) operations.

This week, however, President Trump directed the Pentagon to create his new Space Force. It would be absolutely absurd not to notice the timing of the announcement that grabbed at least some of the headline space from news organizations that would otherwise have been directed at video and audio of toddlers in cages as they wept openly for their parents. It seems the Dear Leader couldn't help but notice this timing either, even as he made his announcement.

In remarks that ranged over a variety of unrelated topics, Mr. Trump began by saying current U.S. employment levels were the best "in recorded history" and blaming current immigration problems on the Democrats, saying "we have the worst immigration laws in the entire world" and that ongoing issues could be resolved "very quickly if the Democrats come to the table."

Turning his attention to space, the president praised the National Space Council and its chairman, Vice President Mike Pence, for its work re-focusing national space policy, saying "for too many years, our dreams of exploration and discovery were really squandered by politics and bureaucracy. And we knocked that out."

"My administration is reclaiming America's heritage as the world's greatest space-faring nation," he went on. "The essence of the American character is to explore new horizons and to tame new frontiers. But our destiny, beyond the Earth, is not only a matter of national identity, but a matter of national security."

Look, space exploration is sorely in need of funding. That said, nothing about creating a new fighting force for space is going to be quick, easy, or bring about the kinds of results we could see either by funding current space exploration organizations (hey, remember NASA?) or private companies now taking up the challenge. As the Pentagon noted in its response, this foray into the final frontier is going to take a long, long time to set up.

The Pentagon's chief spokesperson Dana W. White issued a statement suggesting the process will take some time.

"We understand the President's guidance. Our Policy Board will begin working on this issue, which has implications for intelligence operations for the Air Force, Army, Marines and Navy. Working with Congress, this will be a deliberate process with a great deal of input from multiple stakeholders."

One can read that as Pentagon-speak for: "Uh, okay, but this is going to take, like, forever." Which, honestly, is probably besides the point. Whatever you might think of the current politics and immigration policy on display, there is little denying that this grand announcement came on the heels of a deluge of negative press and headlines for the President. Whatever side of the political spectrum you're on, hopefully we're all in agreement that space operations are important. If we do, then we should likewise agree that callous calls for massive new programs and full military branches being used as a distraction are an affront to that importance.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 3:46pm

    Are you really distracted that easily?

    Wow, I am usually on Techdirts side, but lets be realistic. Are we really to believe that you think no other government business can take place because it must be for distraction purposes?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 3:57pm

      Re: Are you really distracted that easily?

      Do you think that topics for official government speeches/remarks are randomly pulled out of a hat or specifically chosen to accomplish certain goals?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:54am

        Re: Re: Are you really distracted that easily?

        Do you think that topics for official government speeches/remarks are randomly pulled out of a hat

        For Trump? Yes, but without the hat—I don't get the impression his words are "specifically chosen", and saying he's intentionally trying to distract us might make him seem more strategic than he is. It's just as likely he got distracted himself.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:05pm

      Re: Are you really distracted that easily?

      Well, we just pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council, so I guess it wasn't so much of a distraction. Hell, we ought to just burn the damn kids at the stake, it's an American tradition like the witches ;)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 5:56am

        Re: Re: Are you really distracted that easily?

        Is it bad that I can totally see that happening?

        BTW stop whining about becoming like 1930s Germany. We're actually heading for a regime like Brazil's, complete with massive shanty towns surrounding oases of prosperity and an appalling human rights record, but with access to nuclear weapons.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 5:57am

          Re: Re: Re: Are you really distracted that easily?

          BTW that crack about whining was not directed at anyone in particular. I'm just seeing a lot of comparisons to Hitler's regime in the online spaces I usually haunt.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Mason Wheeler (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 3:58pm

    In remarks that ranged over a variety of unrelated topics, Mr. Trump began by ... saying "we have the worst immigration laws in the entire world"

    For all his many, many very real faults, he's dead right about this one. Virtually everywhere else in the world--including all the countries we get the most immigrants from and that criticize us on our treatment of immigrants--illegal immigration is treated as a very serious crime. Here, we've got a non-trivial fraction of the populace, large enough to influence policy in some places, that treat it as a virtuous act deserving of official protection! And that's simply insane.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Will B., 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:17pm

      Re:

      “Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Killercool (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:31pm

        Re: Re:

        ...You realize that it's still legal for people to immigrate to the US, right? They're just supposed to follow the rules and laws we have in place for it.

        It's never been a great image for someone to say "I love your country, and I would be proud to be a law-abiding citizen- unless it's inconvenient."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Thad, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:00pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          ...You realize that it's still legal for people to immigrate to the US, right? They're just supposed to follow the rules and laws we have in place for it.

          The families the Trump Administration has separated have included asylum-seekers.

          Trump's Muslim ban targeted refugees.

          Trump scuttled the bipartisan DACA deal partially on the grounds that it didn't do enough to decrease legal immigration. You may remember his statement at the time that he wanted more immigrants from places like Norway, as opposed to "shithole countries" like African nations and Haiti.

          Basically, anybody who claims the Trump Administration doesn't have anything against legal immigration is lying, ignorant, or both.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Killercool (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:51pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            No, not everyone who thinks illegal immigration is illegal bows to the Cheeto Benito.

            I do not see refugees as illegal immigrants, especially since they are seeking asylum - that is, seeking permission to stay.

            Just as with all things, it's nuanced. I believe in stronger immigration enforcement, yet am okay with sanctuary cities - as long as they foot their own bill (with regards to the illegals), including for incarceration of criminals.

            I know that Trump has deeply hypocritical views on legal immigration - especially given his family's history as relatively recent immigrants (his granddad was Bavarian). It's especially striking how it smacks of anti-Italian and anti-Irish rhetoric of the early 20th century.

            I don't like the man, and I don't like how he has handled anything to do with immigration. However, bringing US border policy, and enforcement of it, in line with nearly every other country in the world? I don't see that as a bad thing.

            I just could do without the nonsense about unfeasible walls, and the cheering idiots who think adding the National Guard to the Border Patrol means more shooting at border-crossers.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Stephen T. Stone (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:41pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Which countries also have a policy to separate children from their parents if the family illegally enters said countries?

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • icon
                Killercool (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 8:10pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                Really?

                I was pretty clear about "don't like how he has handled anything to do with immigration."

                ANYTHING.

                Better immigration policy and enforcement is a laudable goal. However, Trump heard "goal" and decided it was a game, and he wants to score, no matter the human cost.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • identicon
                  Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:03am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Sounds about right. Here's your problem: a lot of people wink at illegal immigration not because they're flaming bleeding heart liberals but because they take advantage of the cheap labour.

                  Heck, even the most outspoken "enforcement" factioners have been caught with the odd member of staff of dubious origin.

                  If you're going to enforce border control, then, it's time to get honest about what your nation's needs actually are and work with them. Season passes and check-ins via mobile apps for migrant workers might be effective for those who come in for economic reasons.

                  I'd also recommend ending the war on drugs and stopping interfering in the politics of other nations — that's what drives the refugees in your direction.

                  Basically, stop creating refugees and find a legal way to enable migrant workers to work.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • icon
                    SteveMB (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:05am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                    This. I'll take people who claim to be legitimately concerned about illegal immigration seriously when they start demanding that ICE throw illegal employers in cages.

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • identicon
                      Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:11am

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                      They can start with the Mango Mussolini.

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • identicon
                      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:21am

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                      Many of us do want those that hire illegals thrown into prison, but all too often your folks NOT taking us seriously is preventing that conversation... because the moment we talk about it, the deck of cards naming game comes out instead.

                      So how about your take them "seriously" first to find out? I take you all seriously while trash talking your ideas! If I can do do, you should be able to as well!

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      • identicon
                        JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:08am

                        The issue is far more subtle than a lot of people care to ack

                        Despite the fact that I don't buy the current "think of the children" media narrative, I don't think that economic migrants that are already here are a problem. The ones that avoid deport orders are proving themselves even if they did manage to sneak in.

                        Criminal aliens should be a priority.

                        I can't fault strict enforcement or the letter of the law being followed.

                        I think it's absurd that people want those in government they view as Nazis to selectively enforce the law. That's rather deranged.

                        Democrats wanting Trump to act as King rather than sorting out the issues themselves are committing basic civics fail.

                        This crap is what you get when you embrace sloppiness and expedience because "the feels".

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                        • identicon
                          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 1:22pm

                          Re: The issue is far more subtle than a lot of people care to ack

                          Isnt avoiding deport orders making them criminals.

                          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      • identicon
                        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:46am

                        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                        No you do not.

                        There's no plan to go after these people. There's no talk to after the root causes. This is show boating nonsense to get racists smiling.

                        I used to try to argue these points will pinheads like yourself and realized that you know full well you are full of shit and that people will relent just to be done with you if you keep shitting out of your mouth.

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • icon
                    ShadowNinja (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:15am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                    If you're going to enforce border control, then, it's time to get honest about what your nation's needs actually are and work with them. Season passes and check-ins via mobile apps for migrant workers might be effective for those who come in for economic reasons.

                    Even if we stop 100% of illegal immigration at the borders (an impossible feat, but that's besides the point), it STILL won't stop illegal immigration in the US.

                    As explained in Adam Ruins The Wall, a majority of illegal immigrants came to the US legally. They just didn't leave when they were supposed to.

                    There's also the fact that it's darn near impossible/super expensive to find and deport all 11 million or so illegal immigrants already in the US.

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • identicon
                      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 1:24pm

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                      Other walls around the world have proven mighty effective, stopping over 99% of illegal border crossing.

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      • identicon
                        Will B., 20 Jun 2018 @ 3:01pm

                        "Illegal border crossing"

                        Cute magic trick. Unfortunately, illegal border crossing is not the same as undocumented immigration - hence why the very person you are replying to pointed out that most undocumented immigrants cross LEGALLY and then overstay their visas.

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:03am

                The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                Frankly, I would expect to get separated from my family if I broke the law anywhere. I really don't get this strange sense of entitlement that SJWs have when it comes to breaking laws, ignore proprietors, and ignoring any notions of decorum.

                I would expect to get arrested myself. I would also expect to get kicked out of a Starbuck's and have the cops called. I would also expect to get arrested despite my DAR card.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • identicon
                  Thad, 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:39am

                  Re: tl;dr

                  Frankly, I would expect to get separated from my family if I broke the law anywhere.

                  Really? Any law? Jaywalking?

                  SJWs

                  ...you know what, fuck it. I've held off on blocking you this long, God knows why, but using "SJWs" unironically is shorthand for "I will never say anything of value on any subject, ever."

                  Goodbye forever.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • icon
                  Mike Masnick (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:56am

                  Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                  Frankly, I would expect to get separated from my family if I broke the law anywhere

                  Remember, the "crime" here if there is any is a misdemeanor. You actually think separating young children from their parents -- often through deceit and lies with little chance of them being reunited -- is appropriate for a misdemeanor?

                  I really don't get this strange sense of entitlement that SJWs have when it comes to breaking laws, ignore proprietors, and ignoring any notions of decorum.

                  The fact that you are using the pejorative "SJW" pretty much says everything we need to know about you.

                  Have you no decency?

                  This is not about a sense of entitlement. This is about basic human decency and you have demonstrated you have none. Look very closely at yourself in the mirror. Think about what kind of person it takes to justify ripping children from their parents for the misdemeanor of "wanting a better life."

                  Finally: Fuck off. I have no sympathy for ethically devoid assholes, and you have made it clear that you are one.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • identicon
                    Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 1:33pm

                    Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                    There is a reason to the separation and it's that smugglers gangs and child traffickers use children to enter the US. Not all children are separated and those that are are for a reason. There might be some cases of mistakes made but isn't it better to protect the children being abused and trafficked and inflict a temporary discomfort to the ones mistakenly separated rather than let everyone in and take the risk?


                    https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-arter/dhs-cbp-saw-315-percent-increase-illegals-us ing-children-gain-entry-us

                    “In the first five months of fiscal year ‘18, CBP saw a 315 percent increase in individuals using children to pose as family units to gain entry into the country compared to fiscal year ’17. Smugglers and drug traffickers know the loopholes well, and they know that if they reach our borders, they will be released into our country and evade the consequences of their criminal action,” Jonathan Hoffman, assistant secretary of DHS, said.

                    "“DHS takes seriously its responsibility to protect alien children from human smuggling, trafficking, and other criminal action. While ensuring that our immigration laws are enforced, DHS has continued the previous administration’s policy and will separate alien minor children from an adult for his or her protection or in cases where the adult or custodian has been referred for criminal prosecution. This is a policy that has not changed from the prior administration,” Hoffman said."

                    “As a result of some of these loopholes, we continue to see too many cases of children being used by smugglers, traffickers and transnational criminal organizations in an attempt to circumvent our laws and gain entry to the United States,” he said.

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • identicon
                      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 1:58pm

                      Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                      So, let's look at the actual numbers behind that statistic.

                      From 46 individuals using unrelated minors to pose as a family in fiscal year 2017, that is up to 191 over the period of Oct 2017-Feb 2018.

                      Compare that to the total: There were 75,622 family units apprehended in FY 2017, and 31,102 in the first five months of FY 2018.

                      So, it's a jump of .06% of all families apprehended to .6%. You're separating 163 families from their children for every one criminal you catch.

                      The Blackstone ratio is that "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." By that measurement, you're overincarcerating immigrants when looking for your MS-13 smugglers, by at least three orders of magnitude.

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    • icon
                      Mike Masnick (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 5:07pm

                      Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                      There is a reason to the separation and it's that smugglers gangs and child traffickers use children to enter the US.

                      1. Bullshit.

                      2. Even in the very, very, very rare cases where that's happening, it does not justify the practice here, where it's obvious and clear that the vast majority of cases are not smuggling cases.

                      3. If you have evidence of a smuggling/trafficking case, then remove the kids and find a place for them. Otherwise, don't.

                      There might be some cases of mistakes made but isn't it better to protect the children being abused and trafficked and inflict a temporary discomfort to the ones mistakenly separated rather than let everyone in and take the risk?

                      No. You should err in the other direction, because the vast majority of the cases would be in the other direction. Your statement above is the equivalent of "shouldn't we lock up anyone we suspect may murder someone to prevent murder, even if it means "temporary discomfort" for those who never would kill anyone?"

                      Your logic sucks, your humanity sucks, your ethics suck and you need to look yourself in the mirror because you are a despicable person.

                      The policy was not put in place to deal with loopholes and smugglers anyway. The administration flat out admitted it was a deterrence policy. So, seriously: go the fuck away, you are a horrible human being if you defend this policy. It is inhumane and indefensible.

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      • identicon
                        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 5:58pm

                        Re: Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                        *Your logic sucks, your humanity sucks, your ethics suck and you need to look yourself in the mirror because you are a despicable person.*
                        Can't make an argument or have a conversation without name-calling from the left as usual.

                        *The policy was not put in place to deal with loopholes and smugglers anyway. The administration flat out admitted it was a deterrence policy. So, seriously: go the fuck away, you are a horrible human being if you defend this policy. It is inhumane and indefensible.*

                        Deterrence is entirely humane because having borders is necessary and the only reason the world hasn't collapsed yet.
                        Trump has proposed legislation and Schumer said that he wouldn't sign anything because they'd rather make Trump look bad. He just signed an executive order to stop the family separation as much as possible. Looks like you were wrong about the space thing being a smokescreen.

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                        • identicon
                          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:18pm

                          Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                        • identicon
                          Wendy Cockcroft, 21 Jun 2018 @ 2:39am

                          Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                          Deterrence is entirely humane because having borders is necessary and the only reason the world hasn't collapsed yet.

                          Nonsense. The ends don't justify the means and we had borders before that cruelty started. And it is cruelty intended as a deterrent.

                          Remember, many of the people shouting the loudest in favour of this are either using illegal/undocumented labour or cheering on the policies that drive them to America in the first place. Drop the hypocrisy. Move away from the hypocrisy. Come and join the human race. We have cookies.

                          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      • identicon
                        Anonymous Coward, 22 Jun 2018 @ 5:33pm

                        Re: Re: Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                        Thanks Mike for saying it like it is. The brady bill already punishes people for crime they haven't committed by stealing firearms and banning for life legal ownership just for misdemeanors slung at innocent people who are subjected to torture in jails for coercing no contest pleas to pure bullshit conspired agaiinst honest citizens of usa.

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  • identicon
                    Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 3:37pm

                    Re: Re: The West really wasn't as wild as what liberals want these days.

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:32am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                Nazi Germany?

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 3:57pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                https://twitter.com/Kaitain_FL/status/1009559680677502976 Canada apparently, and worse than the US.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Thad, 20 Jun 2018 @ 4:38pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Taken as a whole, the U.S. spends more on border and immigration enforcement than any country, expels as many migrants as any known country and doesn't have an outsize immigrant population. Those who do come here aren't any more prone to criminal behavior than U.S. citizens.

              Source: Arizona Republic

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:02pm

            Re: You may remember his statement at the time

            Ah, but pointing out things he said in the dim distant past (like, more than 10 minutes ago) obviously marks you out as a rad lefty commie or something. Consistency is for Liberals! And anybody demonstrating a memory span longer than the Lügenführer himself is automatically suspect.

            Didn’t he also say he is merely enforcing an immigration law which was passed under the Democrats, anyway? Or was it the Christian Bible he was using as justification for his child abuse?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:13am

              Re: Re: You may remember his statement at the time

              Methought he was all about erasing Obama's legacy. If that's true, why not get rid of that one?

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:22am

                Re: Re: Re: You may remember his statement at the time

                Erasing Obama's Legacy is just a bonus/side effect.

                I hate Trump and I hate Obama, but it will not stop me from cheering when a turd tries to destroy another turd!

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:01am

            Play stupid games, win fun prizes.

            If you are a genuine asylum seeker than what the FUCK are you doing wading across the Rio Grande? This is the BULLSHIT part of the narrative here. You only get arrested if you cross the border illegally. In this regard, you are no different than anyone else that gets arrested in any society regardless of how you feel about how enlightened that society is.

            This isn't even about dubious definitions of political asylum or people trying to game the rules.

            This is all about dragging small children across the harshest parts of our country during the hottest part of they year.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:29am

              Re: Play stupid games, win fun prizes.

              This is all about dragging small children across the harshest parts of our country during the hottest part of they year.

              You're almost there. Now, imagine exactly how desperate you'd need to get to do that.

              You come to the American border, seeking asylum, but are made to wait weeks, then months. Food starts to run out. Your kids are crying all the time. You have no resources to turn back.

              There's only one way available to you: forward. You're weaker every day, rationing the little you have so that the children have more, and leaving yourself not eating enough to avoid starving. Eventually, you make the decision: staying is endless waiting for death, but crossing gives you the slim opportunity for survival, and maybe even prosperity.

              In that position, exactly how long would you wait to make that choice? To drag your small children across the harshest part of America during the hottest part of the year? Exactly how desperate would you need to be in order to attempt it?

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:25am

                Re: Re: Play stupid games, win fun prizes.

                Wow... you just played right into his proof that your concerned with the "feels" more than the facts.

                The question is... how desperate should they be before you agree with a government effort to deploy military force to these affect people?

                Or is the game "save only those able to make it to our borders but FUCK THE REST OF THE DYING KIDS UNABLE TO MAKE IT?"

                If you really cared about these people, you would be okay with one of the government taking in refugees to go and solve the problem with military might. That way more people can be saved, but that is not what you are after here... you only care to use the situation to bad mouth political opponents. You are a sad little simpleton without a heart at all.

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                • identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:47am

                  Re: Re: Re: Play stupid games, win fun prizes.

                  If I thought that it might do some good, I might want military intervention.

                  All evidence is that the US intervening in other countries causes more suffering than it ameliorates. That the only "good" it accomplishes is funneling more wealth into the pockets of the corrupt rich at the expense of American lives and those of local civilians.

                  Look at Afghanistan; look at Iraq. Hundreds of thousands, or more, dead, and is the situation there any better than it was in 2000?

                  Someone in another thread blamed the refugees for not overthrowing their home country's hostile regime and setting up a more benevolent government, ignoring that whenever that happens, the U.S. often goes right back in and topples the new, nicer government to replace it with another hostile one.

                  Bring the troops home, close the foreign bases, stop selling arms outside of your own country, and then, maybe then, I'd accept that you have no moral obligation to take in refugees at the border. But when so many of the people trying to cross are fleeing from conflicts provoked, instigated, encouraged, armed, or straight up inflicted upon them by the United States of America, turning those people most harmed by your actions away from your borders is nothing more than morally turning your back on the predictable consequences of your own government's reprehensible actions.

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:32pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            There's no "muslim ban" that was a campaign slogan said when there happened to be a lot of terrorism going on both here and in EU. It ended there. The 6 nation ban, which is just a very small percentage of the worlds muslims, are banned because their gov can not verify their peoples backgrounds.

            DACA was being fought in federal court and was about to be declared unconstitutional, which it was. BO did not have authority to modify the law, and he was too ineffectual to get congress on board, hence the phone and pen illegal action.

            It's not that there's anything against legal immigration, but it needs to be adjusted regularly to jive with the jobs that need to be filled and to allow for assimilation. It's a tool for our benefit, not theirs..

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:38pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              There's no "muslim ban" that was a campaign slogan said when there happened to be a lot of terrorism going on both here and in EU.

              Right. Therefore those Executive Orders were mere fiction and they didn't go through multiple judicial reviews.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Rekrul, 20 Jun 2018 @ 5:56am

          Re: Re: Re:

          ...You realize that it's still legal for people to immigrate to the US, right? They're just supposed to follow the rules and laws we have in place for it.

          There have been reports that officials are turning asylum seekers away from designated ports of entry. There's a bridge on the US/Mexico border that is designated as a port of entry where people can cross and ask for asylum and there were people camped out on it for two weeks waiting to be let across to apply for asylum. They were running out of food and water, so many of them crossed "illegally" out of desperation.

          The simple truth is that Trump and his administration don't want dark-skinned people coming into the country regardless of whether they follow the rules or not.

          It was also recently reported that the immigration department would be going through the files of immigrants who legally became naturalized citizens to see if there was anything in their past that they could use to strip them of citizenship and deport them. Already a 62 year old man was arrested and is in ICE detention because of a misdemeanor conviction stemming from a domestic dispute 20 years ago.

          https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/17/us/legal-resident-arrested.html

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:53am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "The simple truth is that Trump and his administration don't want dark-skinned people coming into the country regardless of whether they follow the rules or not."

            You act like the Trump administration is the ONLY administration that has been doing this. It has ALWAYS been happening, you just pick this moment to focus on it. Funny how only certain things matter when certain people are in power depending on the political season.

            The same shit happening under Trump is the EXACT SAME shit that was happening under Obama. You just can't get to them all, and their idea of time is not the same as your idea of time. Their idea of asylum is not the same as your idea of asylum. What you think works is not the same as what they think works, or what I think works, or what the government think works, or what the agents on the border think works.

            It is far more likely you are using a circumstance of the situation to lay false blame... which is far more likely considering that you are probably just another political party cheer leader where your own team does no wrong and the other team is evil incarnate. Seen it all before!

            You want to blame someone or something? Blame the governments that drove these people to this end, blame the people for not rising up against their own governments to secure a future for their own children and instead run to the people that did do something for security INSTEAD OF FUCKING EMULATING THEM, blame the "don't interfere" people in other governments telling their governments they have no right to interfere. The blame is equal on ALL sides, there are ZERO victims here, except the children that get caught up in the selfish, short-sighted, bigoted, ignorant, vile evil of adult know nothings arm chair generaling their self-righteous contempt upon anyone not solving the issue in their "domgatically prescribed" way!

            It's all bullshit but you can't get past your own bastard logic to understand!

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:42am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              Yes, these centres were also open under Obama, and yes, what they were doing at the time was horrible.

              However, Trump has added a new twist. Before, the majority of people in these centres were "unaccompanied minors," that is, children who were sent across the border without their parents.

              Now, though, Trump's zero tolerance policy is doing something even worse: any family that crosses the border illegally is being held and charged instead of just being sent back. And, when the adults are charged, the children are being classified as "unaccompanied" and sent to these same centres.

              That's what's raising the new uproar: not the same old horrors from under Obama, but an entirely new level of horror caused by tearing families apart when they cross together.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • identicon
                Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:28am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                "That's what's raising the new uproar: not the same old horrors from under Obama, but an entirely new level of horror caused by tearing families apart when they cross together."

                Check your facts or your selective memory.


                http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/photos-obama-immigration-detention-facilities

                "Current U.S. immigration laws, when enforced, have the consequence of temporarily separating adults who arrive with children into separate detention facilities in order to prosecute the adults.

                The policy of prosecuting immigrants for crossing the border illegally has been in place for multiple administrations. The Obama administration prosecuted half a million illegal immigrants and similarly separated families in the process. So did the Bush administration.

                Personal accounts from immigration lawyers tell a tale of Obama being equally concerned about unaccompanied minors traveling to the border and wanting to create a deterrent.

                Photos of border detention facilities from the Obama-era, taken during 2014, look nearly identical to the ones taken during the Trump era.

                You never see them, however. Here they are, taken in 2014 during a media tour of Obama-era detention facilities in Brownsville, Texas, and Nogales, Arizona."

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Rekrul, 22 Jun 2018 @ 11:32am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              You act like the Trump administration is the ONLY administration that has been doing this. It has ALWAYS been happening, you just pick this moment to focus on it. Funny how only certain things matter when certain people are in power depending on the political season.

              Maybe it's the fact that Trump is so openly racist that makes this episode stand out so much. Maybe it's the fact that Trump is an uncultured buffoon who embarrasses the U.S. every time he opens his mouth. Maybe it's the fact that he's the most openly corrupt president in U.S. history. Maybe it's the fact that he would clearly be more comfortable being a dictator than being president. Maybe it's the fact that he has the IQ of a doorknob. Maybe it's the fact that he lies every time he opens his big fat mouth for any reason other than to stuff a cheeseburger into it.

              Maybe all these things point to the fact that not only is Trump a horrible person, he's a danger to the United States and world stability. The damage he's doing to our country and to our standing in the world will take years to fix, if it even can be fixed.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:35pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "don't want dark-skinned people" .. Talk about intellectual laziness. You can't be taken seriously if you spout such silliness.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Will B., 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:54pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          The poem is about empathy, not legality.

          Things are only illegal if we MAKE them illegal; to claim that they are illegal THEREFORE we MUST send them back is the wrong way around. People (specifically racists and the politicians who represent them) WANT to send them back, THEREFORE we MAKE them illegal.

          I am of the opinion that undocumented immigrants should be given clemency and a path toward citizenship, rather than living in fear of deportation. That is the humanist, empathetic thing to do.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Stan (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 1:19pm

        Re: Re: Your huddled masses

        “Give me your tired, poor and frightened children
        yearning to be free...our concentration camps are waiting for them."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:55pm

      Re:

      So separating toddlers from their parents and caging them without due process is an appropriate “punishment?” At the risk of Godwining the thread, you know who else did that?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Killercool (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:09pm

        Re: Re:

        This? This is what you call a "false dichotomy."

        There is an option aside from "let them all in" and "literal cages for children." And, frankly, it's what we were doing before Trump saw Obama's name associated with it.

        Well, no. Honestly, Obama's "jail-em-all" policy was pretty bad, too. Definitely better than the Children's Pound that's going on now, though.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:29pm

        Re: Re:

        It's not punishment it's due process because they cannot be trusted to show at a court appointment without vetting before.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:36pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Right. Not like some adult will be in control of the minors. Trust cannot be transferred to minors, they haven't reached the age of reason. And those that have will still be in control of adults. Even if they are incarcerated with their parents.

          And it is punishment. The crime is only a misdemeanor. Misdemeanors do not 'require' incarceration.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anon, 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:10pm

    A Space Force sounds rad! Where do I sign up?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:35pm

      Re:

      Don't worry. At the current rate of world politics, you should expect to be drafted into it within the next 5 years.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    JoeCool (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:20pm

    Pres Chump

    I think he see a Space Force kinda like this

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljmEkWkT5Qc

    :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 4:44pm

    Divisive crap article is crappy and divisive.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    wereisjessicahyde (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:03pm

    Watching too many films

    Presumably the Space Force will be based on not a moon, but a large spherical battle station capable of destroying whole planets. Ideally one with a glaring but easily fixable design flaw that can be exploited by a single-seater attack interceptor.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Thad, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:06pm

      Re: Watching too many films

      Nah, Star Wars was a Reagan thing.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:18pm

        Re: Re: Watching too many films

        And that is why I am surprised it has not been called Starfleet, a la Star Trek. (The things missing are the United Federation of Planets, but only because they have not made contact with us yet...at least not publicly, and we haven't cured the need to have 'things' but strive on self improvement, instead).

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:18am

          Re: Re: Re: Watching too many films

          You shouldn't be, AAC.

          * United Nations in space? John Bolton and Nikki Haley are having none of it; the Cardassians would veto anything that told them to get their mitts off Bajor.
          * Without a consumer economy, we'd be producing only for need. Who would decide that? That question was ignored in ST for some mad reason because our future isn't orange, it's unicorns and rainbows because it's the FUTURE. In space.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:06am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Watching too many films

            Yeah, I am not convinced that the Star Trek utopia is even possible. There are human things such as greed and a desire for power that are not explained by such a system, for example.

            It is nice to think about removing need however.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Wendy Cockcroft, 21 Jun 2018 @ 5:48am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Watching too many films

              I'm on board with that. When basic necessities are not denied anyone due to lack of opportunity we will be able to move forward on a planetary level.

              I don't have a problem with inequality as such; I just want all of us to be able to access food, shelter, clean water, medicine and education. We can provide everyone with that and still have billionaires.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ryuugami, 20 Jun 2018 @ 12:26am

      Re: Watching too many films

      I guess it's time to revisit the Death Star petition.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Loftwork, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:09pm

    A Space Force sounds great. Finally, a place for all the White House space cadets. Maybe Bolton or Pompeo would want to lead the Star Wars battalion? From the Death Star, of course. Have to remember to send them Oxygen from time to time.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:25pm

    A Space Force sounds great. I'm sure the Air Force is going to love its budget cuts. This is just another opportunity for Prez bone spurs to appoint more Nazi's.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:00pm

      Re:

      Did the Army end up with budget cuts once the Air Force was created? I highly doubt the 2nd most important armed force in the world will suddenly find itself destitute.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 12:45pm

        Re: Re:

        I doubt budget cuts were a big concern in 1947 when the Air Force was officially created, and they had largely operated independently of the Army during WWII. It made sense to reorganize the post-war military. It makes no sense now.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:36pm

      Re:

      Well, Republicans are supposed to be for tax cuts and smaller government...right?...Well aren't they?

      This Space Force means one of two things. Either cuts to other military services, when we are engaged, but not at war, in several instances (it is hard to keep count these days), and expending huge sums on those. Or, a tax increase. Or is the administration planning on taking this out of some other budget departments...like Social Security or other lifeline type programs where they don't have enough now?

      Sounds to me like a contract on republicanism. Both higher taxes and bigger government, while (likely but only supposed or expected) attacking the funding of social programs so the impact on other military branches is mitigated.

      So how does one go about defining the new republicans? Bigger government along with bigger taxes, and a world that could have been friends but are now enemies do to an unnecessary trade war, started by us? Are the parties going to switch sides...again? Or are we gonna get a whole new variable of which is the worst evil?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Wendy Cockcroft, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:22am

        Re: Re:

        Trump's foreign policy is basically, "We're America, bitch!"

        Okay, try to imagine Biff Tannen running the USA. Actually, that's what you've got. So... yay?

        All that crap about a glorious future in space is to distract us from the fact that he's flushing the country down the toilet because Bannon said so.

        Everybody needs friends. Keeping allies off-balance might have been a Hitler thing to do but it didn't work out too well for him, did it?

        Where is 21st century Erwin Rommel when we need him?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:25am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "Trump's foreign policy is basically, "We're America, bitch!""

          I would say Trump's ONLY policy, foreign or domestic, is "me me me motherfuckers". Trump actually does not care about America, he cares about how it reflects on his idea of what it should look like monetary wise.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:12am

        You really have no idea what you're talking about.

        > Well, Republicans are supposed to be for tax cuts and smaller government...right?...Well aren't they?

        That means sticking to the Constitutionally mandated roles spelled out for the federal government.

        The Military is one of those few things.

        If you are going to argue this stuff at least be vaguely competent about it.

        All of those social programs you like are the scope creep, not another branch of the Army.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:09am

          Re: You really have no idea what you're talking about.

          That means sticking to the Constitutionally mandated roles spelled out for the federal government.

          The Constitution does not require political parties, nor allowing corporations to bribe legislators.

          The Military is one of those few things.

          It's not the existence of the military, it is the use of the military in ways that some reasonable people find disturbing.

          All of those social programs you like are the scope creep, not another branch of the Army.

          What social programs do I like? I mentioned social security and lifeline programs. Should we just let those people die?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:34am

            Re: Re: You really have no idea what you're talking about.

            "The Constitution does not require political parties, nor allowing corporations to bribe legislators."

            He said be competent about it... this is incompetent and has NOTHING to do with the conversation.

            "What social programs do I like? I mentioned social security and lifeline programs. Should we just let those people die?"

            Do you have a camera in your bedroom with a direct feed to your local police department? If not then should they just like you kill people in your bed room?

            Do you now see how much bullshit is contained in your argument yet? "think of the children" is one of the fastest ways to trick people into giving up their liberty.

            Nobody wants people to die and your bullshit narrative implying that those not supporting your dogmatic bullshit do is pretty fuckin lame!

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 5:32pm

    My theory is that someone showed Trump that Futurama episode with the space fence to keep the aliens out and he thought "that's a great idea". I mean, Futurama is on Fox, right?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:23pm

    So we're gonna make sure we can waste tons of money into the pockets of big contractors to protect us in space, while the mudball they are supposed to protect slips further into ruin.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    TRX, 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:47pm

    > crying children

    It's sad that their parents are criminals, but it's hardly DJT's fault.

    For some reason few people seem to like my plan for dealing with the illegal immigration problem. Maybe I should write another letter...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:13pm

      Re:

      Can you express some ethical/legal necessity for the separation?

      Even if the parents are in the US illegally, what is the need for the separation? Is it a cost thing? More expensive to keep families together rather than in large cages with like ages/sexes? Is that sufficient for the behavior of law enforcement?

      What if the parents are granted asylum? Is the separation still legitimate?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Brad, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:10am

        Re: Re:

        Yea it's called Flores v. Loretta Lynch the 9th Circuit upheld the Flores Consent Decree of 1997 and SCOTUS refused to take the case.

        It's the same ruling that Mr. Bush Jr and Mr. Obama followed it's just now convenient to act stupid. Keep in mind no illegal alien is afforded anything but basic Habeas Corpus under any law of the land. After that they fall under strict Immigration Laws one of which is this Consent Decree.

        If you fallow the technical laws the US government has no choice but to separate those kids from people who may or may not be there real parents.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:40am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Since when has our government actually followed all of their own laws? They tend to do so, selectively, when it fits an agenda whether stated or left to the imagination, and often except themselves. So they do have a choice.

          Oh, and there are ways to determine if 'those kids' belong to a particular set of 'parents', which include documents as well as various tests, such as DNA. To NOT do so seems a bit authoritarian, which is the demeanor they seem to want to project. It appears that they think if they are cruel enough, and the word gets out, then others will not try illegal entry. It's the cruel part that has everyone upset.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:10pm

          Re: US government has no choice but to separate those kids

          The Flores settlement, named for a teenage girl who brought the case in the 1980s, requires the government to release children from custody and to their parents, adult relatives or other caretakers, in order of preference.

          If those options are exhausted, authorities must find the "least restrictive" setting for the child who arrived without parents.

          ...

          The decision did not state parents must be released. Neither, though, did it require parents to be kept in detention, apart from their children.”

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 4:54am

      Re:

      "It's sad that their parents are criminals, but it's hardly DJT's fault."

      Oh? They are? That's news to me. As far as you hear on the media it's usually your average Jane/Joe striving for a better life. Sometimes fleeing from fucking Hell.

      "For some reason few people seem to like my plan for dealing with the illegal immigration problem."

      Thankfully most of us aren't sociopaths.

      "Maybe I should write another letter..."

      Please don't, this small reply to the article has said enough about yourself.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:27am

        Re: Re:

        "It's sad that their parents are criminals, but it's hardly DJT's fault."

        Oh? They are? That's news to me. As far as you hear on the media it's usually your average Jane/Joe striving for a better life. Sometimes fleeing from fucking Hell.

        ***Worth noting here that most of the family separations are happening to families that have committed no other crimes other than attempting to cross the border, which is a MISDEMEANOR***

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:16am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Also worth noting that in the case of asylum seekers, it is prohibited to impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves, so prosecuting asylum seekers as illegal immigrants is a violation of international law.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_Relating_to_the_Status_of_Refugees

          The US is a party to this convention. I love the hypocrisy of a government that complains about people who violate our laws while simultaneously ignoring international laws that we agreed to comply with.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:36am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            "I love the hypocrisy of a government that complains about people who violate our laws while simultaneously ignoring international laws that we agreed to comply with."

            Quick name at least 1 country not guilty of this.

            Hint: Don't even bother looking the answer is 0!

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:26am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              So America's not supposed to be better than that? Is that seriously your answer? What about American exceptionalism?

              Yes, I'm clearly being facetious since we're one of the biggest violators of international law in the world. But your whataboutism is complete horseshit. You didn't even bother naming one country worse than America. Surely you can think of one, tovarisch?

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:47pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Also worth noting that in the case of asylum seekers is that they are required to apply for asylum at the first border they cross.. If they didn't, they are most likely not eligible..

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 21 Jun 2018 @ 10:28am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              That's not true. You're referring to European Court of Justice ruling which obviously has no jurisdictional bearing on jurisprudence outside of the EU and a few other non-EU States in Europe that have agreed to apply the Dublin Convention provisions.

              Unless there is another treaty that I'm unaware of, the concept of returning refugees to the first border they cross only applies to the Dublin Convention States, and even then it only requires applicants to seek asylum in the EU member State whose border they first crossed when entering the EU. There has been no attempt to deport Syrians who passed through Turkey into Greece back to Turkey, but hopeful asylees have been sent back from other member States to Greece and Italy in order to apply for asylum in the country where they first crossed the EU border.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:45pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          "which is a MISDEMEANOR" .. Yes, the first offense is. 2nd is a felony, and that is not a new policy..

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:14am

        Sneaking in through the bedroom window.

        If they are caught in the middle of the Arizona desert, then they are breaking the law.

        This is a subtle detail that the liberal media narrative is glossing over.

        If you come in through the front door, you're an invited guest. If you sneak in through the bedroom window, you are burglar and can be shot on sight.

        Context generally matter. This is especially true for the law.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 19 Jun 2018 @ 6:49pm

    What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

    From this report:

    Holocaust survivor Yoka Verdoner was one of a growing chorus who have likened family separations to what happened at concentration camps. She told the Guardian the practice was "as evil and criminal as what happened to me and my siblings as children in Nazi Europe. It needs to be stopped immediately."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 4:58am

      Re: What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

      Doesn't really matter as long as it's our friends doing it to the enemy. And by enemy I mean everybody and everything we don't agree with or don't understand. - Bigoted asshole

      Deep inside it's fear fueled by ignorance. Trump has plenty of ignorance so he must have plenty of fears.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:16am

      Re: What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

      Sure. As evil as your entire family being gassed and thrown into a mass grave.

      The fact that he's an actual survivor doesn't make his hysterics any less BS. I would tell him to his face. I would suggest he try saying that again while we both watch Night and Fog together.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:57am

        Re: Re: What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

        Only the left is allowed to Godwin... didn't you get the memo?

        If a minority is not a democrat then it is perfectly fine to racially disparage them and verbally abuse them!

        The left is all about trying to create a caste system. They failed when republicans took their slaves away and they need to find another way to turn people into slaves.

        The individual is the greatest minority and the democrat are against the individual. They are pro sectarian, they are pro group, they are pro fraternity! The republicans are not entirely guilt free either but they are easily being outdone by the dems of late by large margins.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:38pm

      Re: What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

      Hogwash!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:43pm

      Re: What If It’s A Holocaust Survivor Doing The Godwinning?

      Someone should tell him that no body is being taken away to be killed. They are taken in to be cared for, fed, clothed, and getting medical attention. This whole "history repeating itself" theme is just too fucking crazy to take anyone who spouts it seriously..

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:12pm

    Astro Nuts

    Kinda hard to imagine a country that has scuttled the space program having a "Space Force."
    Nice of Trump to declare that he wants us to go back to the moon - while slashing NASA and education budgets. I guess.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 12:50pm

      Re: Astro Nuts

      NASA wastes its money doing science stuff like researching climate change.

      Trump would rather funnel that money into a military he can directly boss around dictator style and make a big show of how the U.S. is better than everyone (even though one of the things that made us better than everyone was NASA)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:25pm

    We could call the new force the Space Marines! Oh wait... that's already trademarked.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:36pm

    But you'd NEVER distract by claiming they're all crying orphans

    deserving of our best efforts, right?


    Undocumented kills women in Miami, dumps bodies on street...

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article213426999.html

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Stephen T. Stone (profile), 19 Jun 2018 @ 7:42pm

    First they came for the migrant children; although I spoke up, I was deemed “fake news”.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 10:16pm

    One day GOD is going to pull these peoples' heads out of there asses and punish them for the. treason they have committed against this once great nation.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2018 @ 11:37pm

    Of course, this never stopped Janet Reno from flinging kids who thought they were finally safe back into the ocean - a truly horrifying sight at the hands of godless democrats.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:53am

      That’s a pretty pathetic whataboutism even for a Trumptard.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:29am

      Re:

      What is it about you Trumptards always trying to deflect with "what about this? what about that?"

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      #McCabeToo, 21 Jun 2018 @ 1:52am

      re: Janet Reno for the baby killer win!

      Elian Gonzalez...if you recall that fiasco, remember how the first thing his grandmother did when he returned? She literally nibbled his putz, and the then-left didnt say a word about it~ and this, at the height of Satanic panic daycare hoaxing.

      And Branch Davidians....it seems that if we roast a few bad kids, the useful eaters get fed well.

      And, whew! The useful eaters saved us from more Branch Davidians!

      Now, look! Extra money flowing to states, for sleeping cells for good kids from othered places!

      (And the federal dollars that flow to the states that kidnap them into foster "care".)

      This was all described in industrial terms in the gender lesbian feminist writings that preceded this event.

      Ir, didnt you take the womens study course in safe spaces?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rekrul, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:05am

    I found Trump's inspiration for his space force. Apparently someone showed him this clip and he thought it was a documentary made in another country;

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG5v7ng0o4A

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:22am

    Typical left again...

    Shame on everyone for not letting people flood their countries, but oh damn you better not interfere with those nations either.

    Immigrants are not treated well anywhere and picking on just one side of the isle shows that integrity is a non-value here. Other than the "rhetoric" in the news about immigration I have seen zero change in the number of illegals doing the same old thing for the past 20 years.

    It is so typical that you hyper focus on words being moved around but pay little attention to the actual result of the work at hand. If a democrat slaughtered a million "undocumented workers" but said "we welcome them" you clowns would not give a damn! If a republican says "shit hole country" and only a few hundred died you would be ripping your own heads off in a fit.

    Whatever, you guys are no different than Trump when the rubber meets the road and I bet that pisses you right the fuck off!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 6:30am

      Re:

      Moron

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:26am

        Re: Re:

        Try posting something instead of just "signing your name"

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:42am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That was the only response necessary for the trite you vomited.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:42am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            if that was vomit, when what to you call that comes out of your mouth? total waste? at least vomit still has nutritional value even thought it might be disgusting.

            As far as you are concerned you are more than happy for people to just dying, being raped, abused, or other in an effort to make it to the border. But hell, you don't care, you get to sit here on the internet trash talking one government that is doing what every other government has done or is still doing too!

            Nice job fuckwad, you only care enough because you can use the situation to make "one" person look bad when in reality... it makes everyone look bad, but you can't be bothered to share in the blame can you... too busy enjoying those creature comforts you are clearly okay with denying anyone not able to make it to a border, especially those little babies.

            Let me make it clear, you are a sick fucking human... lets take our militaries and take over these fucking governments causing this problem, IF you actually gave a real damn, but you don't!

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Stephen T. Stone (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 7:32am

      Re:

      Last time I checked, Democrats were not calling for the deaths of undocumented immigrants, nor were they separating migrant children not even old enough to talk from their families. Now, Republicans—Trump specifically—may not be doing the first just yet, but given how the party in power has essentially sanctioned the second by refusing to challenge Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric, I would not put too much faith in our wannabe dictator-in-chief not doing the first at some point.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        JEDIDIAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:18am

        Re: Re:

        NOBODY is calling for the death of illegal aliens.

        That stupid bullshit just undermines you to anyone with half a brain and an ability to expose themselves to something other than CNN.

        Even PBS despite it's bias isn't engaging in this kind of shameless propgandizing.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 9:50am

        Re: Re:

        "Last time I checked, Democrats were not calling for the deaths of undocumented immigrants, nor were they separating migrant children not even old enough to talk from their families."

        Oh yes they fucking do!

        When people talk about military intervention and you fuckers go sideways it is the same as CALLING for innocent death!

        And the separation of family's is NOTHING NEW. The people on borders listen to people lying all fucking day long, in fact it is the one thing you can go to your death being certain of... lies. Just because a human shows up with 3 kids does not mean they are actually their kids. How hard would it be to steal a child too small or afraid to speak for themselves? Not hard after they have been beaten and raped for a few weeks before they got to the border. Do you think the dregs of humanity cannot think of this? They have though of worse!

        Unlike most people here I do spend time helping the less fortunate... let me tell you... nothing but lies all over the place. And it's not even because they are trying to game the system, some of it is because they are embarrassed or too proud to admit things. Some of them are more than willing to create any lie just to tug the heart strings. Some of them would just murder you for your bubblegum or because you looked at them wrong. Some just do it because they have a pathological need to lie for no other reason that it gets their damned rocks off!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 4:36pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          "Some of them would just murder you for your bubblegum or because you looked at them wrong."

          And EVERY SINGLE night I turn on the evening news and 5 CITIZENS have done exactly that just in this 1 city.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 21 Jun 2018 @ 7:23am

          Re: Re: Re:

          When people talk about military intervention and you fuckers go sideways it is the same as CALLING for innocent death!

          Oh, I as a democrat would love some military intervention. Nothing like another 18 year war to keep the military industrial complex moving. I mean, we give them so much funding, we might as well make those fuckers work.

          Welfare sucks, and I for one am not content to let our military just sit on their collective asses doing nothing. Let's bomb some shit! We have the success stories of Iraq and Afghanistan! Fully functional democracies and the region is stable as all fuck!

          And while we're at it, let's reinstate the draft, but this time, no deferments. Got bone spurs? Fuck you and your feet! We'll find something for you to do! Don't tell me you can't work - what are you, some kind of welfare recipient not willing to earn your keep? Are you some well-off rich prick who thinks you're going to college? Fuck that shit too! You need to show some fucking patriotism and carry a gun! You wouldn't sit for the national anthem, why would you not serve your country for real?

          That was sarcasm clearly, but honestly, I'd love some military intervention, with the stipulation that those deciding who/what/where to blow up put their own kids on the line. Because this country over the last 20 years has been fuck-all stupid about what countries they decided to start a fight with, and calling for more stupid with the retard that the russians elected president isn't going to end well for anyone.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Peter Henry Fonda, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:16am

    WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS MOTHER’S ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES AND SEE IF MOTHER WILL WILL STAND UP AGAINST THE GIANT ASSHOLE SHE IS MARRIED TO. 90 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STREETS ON THE SAME WEEKEND IN THE COUNTRY. FUCK

    ---

    Just repeating. NOT a spoof, you can find it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      JEDIDAH, 20 Jun 2018 @ 8:21am

      More trumped up nonsense.

      The separation of minors is specifically intended to isolate them from adults that may not be trustworthy.

      You're trying to "Trump" things up here and the nonsense is tiresome. It's a constant unrelenting wave of bullshit.

      You could compare it to an orphanage or juvie hall but that sort of honesty doesn't seem at all fashionable any more with modern liberals.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:24am

        Re: More trumped up nonsense.

        You could compare it to an orphanage or juvie hall but that sort of honesty doesn't seem at all fashionable any more with modern liberals.

        You threw honesty out the window the minute "alternate facts" became the conservative "excuse" for otherwise being full of shit.

        Get used to it - you changed the rules. Now it's our turn to play the game.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Thad, 20 Jun 2018 @ 10:41am

        Re: More trumped up nonsense.

        ...did you just misspell your own name?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 20 Jun 2018 @ 12:22pm

    Ohh!!! Canada...

    I wonder how long this would happen if we did it to Canadians..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 20 Jun 2018 @ 2:37pm

    "What Is Surely Not Any Kind Of Distraction From Crying Children" .. That's funny, I thought crying children was the distraction from the AG report.. Lol.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    !ROG*S!, 21 Jun 2018 @ 1:21am

    Oh, thanks for this thread!

    It answers all of my questions about how the left built a massive gulag system here starting in 1993, and separated fathers from their children, putting them into debt bondage, an patholigizing masculinity.

    The Domestic Violence Industrial Complex to the rescue! Cuz men are all violent rapists!(certainly our CIA controlled media had nothing to do with the narrative)

    Then, a little quantitative easing, and a Welfare State to full blown police state as we see today.Cuz~useless eaters!

    So....we lock up our population, and import new kids, each of which guarantees a million dollars from the feds to the state that kidnaps them.

    I would think you would be FOR this form of kidnapping! Money in the bank.

    Its basic peonage math! And, it keeps prison guards, the baby farmers and foster “care” providers, ”social workers, and other police staters employed.

    Tiday, with the added bonus of a new group of kids to monitor, and database at the water cooled UTAH data center, staffed by the Mormon mafia.

    Whats not to love about this?!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    It's Me Again, 21 Jun 2018 @ 11:52pm

    It's Official!!!

    I turned in my paperwork today.
    I'm now a Space Cadet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.