New York State Eyes Its Own Net Neutrality Law

from the looming-legal-fisticuffs dept

Numerous states say they'll be crafting their own net neutrality protections in the wake of the FCC's recent vote to dismantle the rules. ISPs of course predicted this, which is why Comcast and Verizon successfully lobbied the FCC to include provisions in its "Restoring Internet Freedom" order that bans states from protecting consumers from privacy and net neutrality violations, or other bad behavior by incumbent ISPs. In ISP lobbying land, stopping states from writing protectionist law is an assault on "states rights," but when states actually try to help consumers you'll note the concern for states rights magically disappears.

Regardless, New York State, California and Washington have all indicated that they will attempt to test the FCC's state preemption authority on this front in the new year by crafting their own net neutrality legislation. You'll recall that the FCC already had its wrist slapped by the courts for over-reach when it tried to preempt states from passing anti-community broadband laws, quite literally written by large ISPs, intended to hamstring creative solutions (including public/private partnerships) for the telecom industry's broadband competition logjam.

But even if the FCC wins this new legal fight over state authority, folks like New York Assemblymember Patricia Fahy argue there's numerous steps states and cities can take to protect consumers on the net neutrality front without running afoul of the FCC's order. The text of her proposal (pdf) includes numerous proposals, including refusing to do business with companies that repeatedly violate net neutrality:

"If you are going to be a contractor and want to work with New York, then you must meet the principles,” Fahy tells Fast Company. She hopes that this approach will get around a roadblock known as preemption. The Constitution generally gives the federal government final authority over commercial activities that cross state lines. But while New York can’t require ISPs to uphold net neutrality, it can use its “power of the purse” to punish ISPs that don’t.

"There’s a decent amount of precedent for saying, if you want a state contract, you have to meet such and such requirements,” she says, noting construction contracts contingent on certain labor practices or the use of U.S.-made steel."

Again we'll see how this all pans out in the new year. States will likely face the same problem as the federal government did when trying to define net neutrality violations amidst a sea of ISP lobbying influence. Regardless, the FCC's battles with the states will be just one part of a cavalcade of lawsuits filed against the FCC in the new year for over-stepping its authority, ignoring the public, and rushing through what's potentially the least-popular decision in tech-policy history.

This same sequence of events played out earlier this year when the GOP and Trump administration rushed to kill consumer broadband privacy protections, resulting in numerous states attempting to create their own broadband privacy laws. And while Comcast, Verizon and AT&T lobbyists like to whine that states are wreaking havoc by creating discordant, inconsistent consumer protections, they tend to ignore the fact that this wouldn't be happening if they hadn't spent millions of dollars gutting popular, over-arching protections on the federal level.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Dec 2017 @ 5:26pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "I struck a nerve I see."

    Indeed you did, you struck the is that really all you got nerve?

    "If you can't take the heat..."

    Not much heat, more pity than anything.

    "Present some statistics that prove all local governments are so completely corrupt. If you can't, then why should I take your word for it?"

    Which one you want, the incarceration rates for minorities?
    Or how about all of those city councils that have been using traffic violations to pad their coffers, or the civil asset forfeitures, or all the shot dogs, or how about the judges that put children in juvy to pad their "investment" strategies. How about the cities that created contracts with the ISP's to help block google fiber from deploying, or cities that lost their municipal broadband deployments lawsuits?

    I mean I can go on forever. You do know that in the vast majority of cases people actually deal with local government agencies where most of the bullshit happens and NOT with federal agencies and authorities. I mean, you DID KNOW THAT RIGHT?

    Go and take a look at the innocence project champ. They have 353 of the high profile cases. Rare and occasional local corruption was not responsible for the Rodney King beating, rare and occasional local corruption was not responsible for the million man march, rare and occasional local corruption was not responsible for the Ferguson riots, rare and occasional local corruption is not responsible for all of the back alley business dealings and crimes being perpetrated.

    You are the school yard bully. I have facts, you have "feelings" and "dogma".

    Go down and pass out FIJA flyers at your local courthouse and find out how not locally corrupt your place is? Please report back, I am sure the police will be very friendly with your rights.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.