HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! Looking for something to read instead? Check out our new Working Futures anthology »
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! Looking for something to read instead? Check out our new Working Futures anthology »

Campaigners For SESTA See It As A First Step To Stomping Out Porn

from the good-luck-with-that dept

There are obviously a lot of mixed motivations behind the push for SESTA -- the Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act -- with many of those motivations based on good intentions of actually stopping sex trafficking. Of course, we've explained in great detail how SESTA isn't likely to help at all, and is quite likely to make the problem worse. It also seems clear that many of those lining up in support of the bill see it as a wedge -- a way to slowly dismantle intermediary liability protections for platforms on the internet. And thus, some just see it as a way to attack Google and Facebook out of a general dislike for those companies -- without realizing (or without caring) just how much damage it will do to free speech online and the platforms that enable such speech. We've also been perplexed by SESTA supporters using completely bogus stats to insist the problem of sex trafficking is much larger than it truly is. As we noted, sex trafficking is both very real and an absolute tragedy for those caught up in it and their families. But we should be realistic about the actual scope of the problem -- and many SESTA supporters aren't actually able to do that.

But perhaps the motivation behind some SESTA supporters is... even more absurd. An email popped up in my inbox recently with a bunch of really strong language supporting SESTA, coming from a group calling itself the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCSE). They run the website "End Sexual Exploitation" and are strong supporters of SESTA. But what caught my eye is that the end of the email noted the true mission of NCSE isn't to end sex trafficking... but to rid the world of the "public health crisis of pornography."

You see, NCSE began its life in 1962 as Morality in Media, and was a reaction to a ridiculous moral panic over "pornographic material" being left outside of a school. NCSE appears to believe that all porn is pure evil and must be eradicated. The group has insisted that porn is a "public health crisis" and has worked to get states to declare it as such. It also posts a Dirty Dozen list of organizations that it needs to shame for "perpetuating sexual exploitation."

Want to know how totally fucked up the list is? They include the American Library Association and Amnesty International on this year's list. Really. They completely misrepresent the ALA's opposition to mandatory internet filters to claim that libraries have been turned into "a XXX space that fosters child sexual abuse." It put Amnesty on the list because Amnesty dares to call sex workers "sex workers" rather than prostitutes. They also list the Justice Department as an honorable mention for failing to enforce obscenity laws, which NCOSE wants to use to basically criminalize pornography. In other words, NCSE supports pretty blatant censorship.

Now people can certainly differ on their beliefs about prostitution and pornography, but having groups like this at the forefront of destructive, counterproductive bills like SESTA -- which will do nothing to stop actual sex trafficking, and plenty to harm free speech online -- raises some serious questions about what really are the goals of SESTA. NCSE certainly seems to think it's part of the plan to wipe out all pornography. Considering that other SESTA supporters insist (incorrectly) that SESTA won't have any impact on speech online, they might want to consider why one of their major coalition partners seems to be eagerly looking for ways to censor the internet.

Filed Under: porn, sesta
Companies: morality in media, ncse


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Oct 2017 @ 4:30pm

    When I was 16, a priest came to my catholic high school to basically answer questions for us and ask us if we intend to continue pledging ourselves to the catholic church in adulthood.

    Being an intelligent, mature and well spoken teenage pervert, we spent about 20-ish minutes talking about how different forms of pornography apply to the churches views on coveting the form of another and their incredibly broad definition of adultery.

    As you can imagine he had a very easy time arguing the churches views on things like playboy magazine, a strip club or a sleezy movie. But this raised the question for me... what of erotic illustrations that involved no real person? What og erotic fiction? Sex dolls, wet dreams, comics, animals... I even brought up the possibility of sexual attraction to inanimate objects like cars and the like. I made it clear that I was genuinely interested on the churches stance on each thing, whether it applied to me or not.

    Of course, everything wound up being taboo in the end and I respectfully informed him I would not do well in an organization unwilling to compromise.

    BUT!

    I left that conversation with a good deal of respect for that priest. Most shocking to me in that whole conversation was when I ptrsented an argument that seemingly went along with the stated philosophy, such as a strip club effectively de-humanizing the dancers into little more tjan objects to be coveted, while still enabling access to porn, auch as fantasizing about fictional individuals, he actually STOPPED AND THOUGHT IT OVER instead of haphazardly regurgitating talking points or becoming disrespectful to my questions.

    It was honestly a fascinating discussion and I believe we both left respecting one another despite our disagreement. Hell, he basically agreed to disagree with me and complimented me for taking time to actually think the other side through.

    If a horny teenager and a chaste priest can have this discussion calmly, peacefully and respectfully... the hell is everyone elses* excuse?


    NOTE : By everyone else, I mean the political and purity pusher groups trying to take advantage of this situation to push their agenda and people furiously rushing to spew equal amounts of hostile and unconstructive vitriol from the other side.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.