Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As 'Leverage' Over CNN
from the the-peanut-butter-and-jelly-of-bullshit dept
On the campaign trail, you might recall that Donald Trump threatened to block AT&T’s $89 billion acquisition of Time Warner, insisting that the deal was “an example of the power structure” he was fighting, because it would deliver “too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.” Granted he subsequently appointed an FCC chairman in Ajit Pai who’s little more than a rubber stamp for companies like AT&T, and nominated an antitrust boss already on record stating he has no real problems with the merger, leading most analysts to believe the deal will be approved anyway.
There are of course a number of legitimate reasons to block the deal, including concerns that AT&T will make licensing access to necessary programming more difficult than ever for streaming video competitors. Or the fact that AT&T’s using its dominance in wireless to give Time Warner content an unfair advantage over competitors via usage caps and overage fees (aka “zero rating”). It would be foolish to think a company with such a rich history of anti-competitive and anti-consumer behavior wouldn’t use this greater size and leverage anti-competitively.
But these are complicated nuances it’s not-terribly-likely the current President actually understands. Instead, his focus in recent months has been the fact that he doesn’t like Time Warner-owned CNN’s critical coverage of his administration, and, according to the New York Times, hopes to use the deal as “leverage” to force CNN to soften its critcism of the President as part of his broader assault on the media:
“White House advisers have discussed a potential point of leverage over their adversary, a senior administration official said: a pending merger between CNN?s parent company, Time Warner, and AT&T. Mr. Trump?s Justice Department will decide whether to approve the merger, and while analysts say there is little to stop the deal from moving forward, the president?s animus toward CNN remains a wild card.”
Other news outlets noted that the Trump administration is also contemplating demanding the ouster of current CNN boss Jeff Zucker in exchange for approving the deal. The news was quick to result in letters to the DOJ from several Senators who claimed Trump was “interfering” in an approval process that should be left up to regulators and the DOJ to decide:
“Any political interference in antitrust enforcement is unacceptable,” Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar wrote in a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “Even more concerning, in this instance, is that it appears that some advisers to the President may believe that it is appropriate for the government to use its law enforcement authority to alter or censor the press. Such an action would violate the First Amendment.”
If you’re at all familiar with the ethical behavior over at AT&T (like the times it ripped off a program for the hearing impaired or made bills harder to understand to help criminals scam its own customers), it would certainly be in character for AT&T to agree to trample the editorial firewall between itself and CNN to get the deal done — it just wouldn’t be stupid enough to put any such agreement in writing. As the net neutrality fight makes clear, telecom giants aren’t particularly concerned about the whole free speech thing (check out Verizon’s first foray into tech content, for example).
AT&T’s also a world-class expert at making utterly bogus claims when it comes to its latest megamergers, consistently claiming such deals will lower prices, expand broadband coverage and create oceans of new jobs (telecom megamerger history makes it abundantly clear the exact opposite almost always occurs). Given some similar expertise over at the Trump camp, there’s an incredible opportunity for some amazing bullshit here; an opportunity Trump likely won’t want to waste by continuing what’s become an arguably unhealthy fixation on CNN.
The likely outcome is that we’ll get to have our rotten cake and eat it too: a torrent of bogus job and broadband expansion promises the likes of which we’ve never seen before — and a CNN left bridled by a meddling new corporate parent focused exclusively on currying favor in the Trump administration to anti-competitive benefit. Just think of the incredible potential for synergies…and bullshit.
Filed Under: acquisitions, bullying, donald trump, first amendment, free press, freedom of expression, leverage, mergers
Companies: at&t, cnn, time warner
Comments on “Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As 'Leverage' Over CNN”
GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
You pushed my button. I’ll cut-n-paste in the comment I have pre-prepared for when people do this.
Nice article, but…
You used the one phrase that pushes my buttons: "You want to have your cake and eat it, too!"
Well duh! What good is having cake and not being able to eat it?!?! What kind of sick bastard hands you cake and then tells you "You can have this cake, but eating it is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN!" The whole point of having cake is to eat it.
No, the PROPER way to say what is INTENDED is "You want to eat your cake and have it, too!" That makes a LOT more sense. Once you’ve eaten the cake, it’s gone and no amount of crying will allow you to have it afterwards.
People have this saying backwards, and I won’t rest until people use it in the correct fashion! Given this rant, I feel this is mandatory:
http://xkcd.com/386/
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
NUKULAR MELTDOWN!!!!
Re: Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
GAAHHHHHHHHHH NUKEYOULER!
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
Would you really want to eat rotten cake?
Re: Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
What flavor is it? Is it rotten all the way through, or just around the edges?
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
Here’s your democracy but you can not vote
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
Semantic bullshit, we know who YOU work for, right?
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
And why do people say "head-over-heels"?
Your head is supposed to be over your heels!
If your head is over your heels, that is completely normal!
Now, if you went heels-over-head, that would be unusual!
Re: Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
See? Thad gets it!
Re: GAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
I am struck literally head over heels at the aptness of your comment.
That’s a nice merger you have that. Would be a shame if something were to happen to it…
This i what is great about Trump
“Trump Hopes To Use AT&T Time Warner Merger As ‘Leverage’ Over CNN”
The pure and unbridled objective of ALL politics. When your politicians says they are not like this and then says… let’s regulate….
ha ha haaaaaaa…. most politicians are just little trumps with weaker spines!
This is why regulation leads to capture, and why politicians like it, and why politicians don’t enforce laws so you will give them more power with more laws with which they will use to control the market more.
The businesses have already figured it out, just pay the politicians and you get your way, like a racket. Pay for that protection baby! I bet you would hate to see your precious Internets destroyed right? Now give us more power to regulate, BEG FOR IT!
mwuhahahahahaaaaaaa!
Re: This i what is great about Trump
The trick is to have one or more corps keeping the other one or more corps in line via threats of law suit. Without any government to make laws, well – you have anarchy. Is that what you want?
Re: Re: This i what is great about Trump
ha ha… when I talk about the nature of politics and big business you claim that I am asking for anarchy.
Give it a rest Mr. Stawman please!
The Founding Fathers “THEMSELVES” made the same general statements and yet they still setup a government and regulated a few things. O wait… I keep forgetting you guys don’t know who they are. My bad!
Re: Re: Re: This i what is great about Trump
No please tell us again about the one fact about George Washington that you know. We really aren’t tired of you banging on about it.
Re: Re: Re: This i what is great about Trump
How is that a strawman?
Challenge for today:
Remove the company and politician names and make the case for consumer’s benefit in total consolidation of media and internet company giants.
Re: Re:
So your challenge is to remove the context from the story and make the case for something that isn’t the point of the story.
Sounds like you should just write your own story.
So, our tin pot dictator wants to control mergers?
I doubt he is able to spell conflict of interest much less know what it means.
Re: Re:
He does know what it means. It means that when there is a conflict, it must come out in his interest.
/s
Re: Re: Re:
And if there isn’t any conflict happening, then by golly conflict will be created. Because if you can create the conflict, you can also remove it & show what a wonderful leader you are solving the problems that never really existed in the first place.
It works elsewhere in the world for other leaders so I see no reason why it won’t work in the USA.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
“isn’t any conflict happening”
Kelly Ann?
Is that you?
Re: Re: Re:
I think he knows, at least his lawyers do, exactly what conflict of interest means and he, or they, are dancing at the edge deftly so far. We’ll see if they can keep it up. I dob’t think D.T.jr. has the stuff. He should be totally sidelined.
Re: He didn't start the fire.
Don’t kid yourself. Both parties do nothing but rubber stamp this stuff. That’s why we’re even having this discussion to begin with.
I would be shocked if there were any real resistance to this merger regardless of who won the last election.
Worth noting...
…is that attempting to block the merger is just a normal policy decision.
However, threatening to block the merger in an attempt to curtail CNN’s First Amendment rights is an abuse of the power of the office, and as such is quite clearly an impeachable offense.
Not that impeachment will happen: Trump could kill, cook, and eat a baby on the White House lawn and the spineless Republican members of Congress would furrow their brows and go on cable news to “express concern”, then ignore it entirely in order to put party ahead of country.
Re: Worth noting...
Worth noting is party ahead of country. It seems to be a very common virus in todays world…
“The merchants knew perfectly in what manner it enriched themselves. It was their business to know it. But to know in what manner it enriched the country was no part of their business.”
Re: Worth noting...
http://www.theonion.com/article/firebrand-john-mccain-demands-immediate-investigat-56026
Billy Rubin
"…it just wouldn’t be stupid enough to put any such agreement in writing."
That’s where Trump comes in. He’s the new Midas – everything he touches turns to shit.