Majority Of Intuit's Lobbying Dollars Spent Trying To Stop IRS From Making It Easier To File Your Taxes

from the death-and-taxes dept

There has been an effort underway these past few years to make tax season less stressful, less complicated, and less expensive for a large swath of Americans. These efforts have produced plans to make tax season “return free” for many, with pre-populated tax forms prepared by the government that can either be signed if accurate, or ignored if not with a separate filing then being produced by the person in question. That is, since the IRS already should have most of the details on how much you earned from the companies that paid you, it can send you a pre-filled out tax return document, rather than forcing everyone to redo the same work with the same documents hoping that you don’t make some mistake that will make the IRS man mad. Again, for those who want to go a different way, they can. But for those who find the IRS’s pre-filled documents to be okay, it will make tax filing significantly less of an issue. If you live outside the US, this may sound strange to you, because much of the rest of the world alread does it this way. In a recent episode of Planet Money, the analogy is made that the way we do taxes in the US would be like if credit card companies sent you a “bill” that was a blank sheet of paper, expecting you to fill out all your charges over the past month, and if you got anything wrong, you’d be punished. On taxes, most of the rest of the world the taxes are more like your credit card bill. In the US, it’s more like a blank sheet of paper. And, as in years past, some are finally trying to fix things in the US.

This plan has unfortunately run into the extreme distrust of all things government currently weaving its way through America and the gobs and gobs of money from Intuit and H&R Block that is making corporate use of that fear. The lobbying efforts of the tax prep industry has been a multi-year campaign (we’ve been writing about it since at least 2010) in which money is given to politicians essentially to have them work directly against the interest of their constituents on the subject of paying taxes into the government. It’s absolutely bonkers (and partially helped along by anti-tax groups saying that anything that makes paying taxes easier should be stopped because taxes are bad).

But since bonkers is quickly becoming SOP in our government, these lobbying efforts have only ramped up recently, with an increase in dollars spent likely correcting for how simple technology is making tax preparation for most Americans.

Intuit spent more than $2 million lobbying last year, much of it spent on legislation that would permanently bar the government from offering taxpayers prefilled returns. H&R Block spent $3 million, also directing some of their efforts towards the bill. Among the 60 co-sponsors of the bipartisan bill: then congressman and now Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.

The bill, called the Free File Act of 2016, looks on the surface to be consumer-friendly. It makes permanent a public-private partnership in which 13 private tax preparation companies — called the “Free File Alliance” —have offered free online tax filings to lower- and middle-income families. The Free File Alliance include both Intuit and H&R Block. But the legislation would also permanently bar the IRS from offering its own free alternative.

There’s something especially cynical about a law that is dressed up as a benefit to consumers by creating corporate partnerships making free tax filings available to the constituency, but which likewise prohibit the government from making the collection of its own tax dues more efficient at the same time. This is essentially a jobs program for the tax prep industry, one which that industry has taken to lying to the public through sock puppets in lieu of showing any kind of gratitude. That the industry now has cabinet-level representatives in its bullpen likely means things aren’t going to get better for millions of American any time soon.

The reason the industry wants its free filing options codified into law in this way is so that it can upsell the public into paid tax services that it would otherwise not buy and likely doesn’t actually need.

In an emailed statement the Free File Alliance’s executive director, Tim Hugo, said that the alliance does not automatically push paid products to those that use the Free File program but the taxpayer does “have the option of ‘opting in’ to receive additional information and offers from the tax preparation company they have selected.”

He said that the lack of awareness of the program is “unfortunate,” and placed blame on the IRS. While the tax agency previously had a large budget to advertise the Free File program, “today that budget is $0, making it difficult to reach the general public,” he said.

While it is indeed a crying shame that the IRS budget to pimp private businesses to the public has been reduced in this manner, it’s arguable more of a shame that lobbying money has kept tax season more complicated and costly than necessary. That the industry is spending money to keep a voluntary option for the public beyond reach in favor of upselling that same public is all the more so.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: h&r block, intuit

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Majority Of Intuit's Lobbying Dollars Spent Trying To Stop IRS From Making It Easier To File Your Taxes”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
28 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Tax code should be free, and actual runnable code

While it is indeed a crying shame that the IRS budget to pimp private businesses to the public has been reduced in this manner, it’s arguable more of a shame that lobbying money has kept tax season more complicated and costly than necessary. That the industry is spending money to keep a voluntary option for the public beyond reach in favor of upselling that same public is all the more so.

The tax code is basically a functional program, not written in a programming language. We should just write it in Scheme or some other standard language, which could then be ported to spreadsheets or whatever as needed.

If the government won’t cooperate, we can do this ourselves. There’s some code around—you may or may not find something covering the forms you need—but I see little organized effort. There should be some wiki where people can translate one line at a time to computer-readable format, and something showing which forms are complete, partially complete or still needed. And then programs like form-fillers and calculation engines that can work on this data.

Anonymous Coward says:

"pre-populated" is not even a valid concept, let alone for PRE-PARED form.

populate = vt. -lated, -lating 1. to be or become the inhabitants of;inhabit 2. to supply with inhabitants; people

Proof that letting just any boob “blog” without a spell-check nanny should be illegal; udder kaos eventuates.

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: "pre-populated" is not even a valid concept, let alone for PRE-PARED form.

It’s been a long time since I’ve run into the Language Police Department, the folks who don’t understand that language can go beyond strict definitions for ease or flavor.

How are things around the department water cooler these days? I assume still depressing and generally unhappy?

ryuugami says:

Re: "pre-populated" is not even a valid concept, let alone for PRE-PARED form.

populate = vt. -lated, -lating 1. to be or become the inhabitants of;inhabit 2. to supply with inhabitants; people

Ah, selectively quoting only a part of the definition. Nice.

populate (third-person singular simple present populates, present participle populating, simple past and past participle populated)

  1. (transitive) To supply with inhabitants; to people.
  2. (intransitive) To live in; to inhabit.
  3. (computing, transitive/intransitive) To fill initially empty items in a collection.

    John clicked the Search button and waited for the list to populate.
    Clicking on the download will populate the data into Excel.

Source.

Proof that letting just any boob "blog" without a spell-check nanny should be illegal; udder kaos eventuates.

Proof that letting just any boob "comment" without a Google search should be illegal 🙂

Anonymous Coward says:

Considering that the “consumer-level” tax preparation business in the United States is a $10 billion dollar a year industry, of course they’re going to fight tooth and nail against any attempt to simplify the personal income tax code.

https://www.franchisehelp.com/industry-reports/tax-preparation-industry-report/

Add to that the large tax accounting firms and in-house corporate tax departments that basically structure the company’s operations to exploit tax loopholes — they’re not about to just roll over and allow the gravy train to end. Every politician who comes to office promising to simplify the tax code ends up adding a plethora of new deductions and financial instruments, which is always good news for the tax preparation industry.

It’s hard to believe that for most of the history of the United States, there was no income tax whatsoever, and yet the country grew and prospered, fought (and always won) wars and everything else that countries are supposed to accomplish.

Jason says:

As a corollary to this I find it ridiculous that I have to wait months for the necessary forms to arrive so that I can fill everything out. My employer usually gets the W2 out the door relatively quickly (early February?) but I routinely have to wait until early March (or later) before I have everything.

What is the holdup? All this stuff is in an accounting computer (or several)… why in the world they can’t run the necessary process and then start the printers within a week or so of the new year I can’t understand.

And yes, since the IRS has all of this info anyway (or should) I don’t really see why you can’t get a pre-populated form and just look it over to be sure everything is right. Sure, there are identity theft concerns that might require some extra thought, but that’s true of the existing process as well.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

My employer usually gets the W2 out the door relatively quickly (early February?) but I routinely have to wait until early March (or later) before I have everything.

Do you really? By the end of the year you should know the exact value and categorization of all your payroll deductions. You’ll know how much interest you made in bank accounts (very little) and you much you spent on medical expenses (too much). Investment funds should have released tax details by now that you can use to calculate your taxes (Ishares did it on Jan 31 for ex., with a QII report on Feb 7), even if they haven’t mailed you your personalized values.

If the IRS wants you to attach the paper forms, you’ll need to wait. It shouldn’t stop you from calculating things.

Jason says:

Re: Re: Re:

True, I could probably come up with just about everything if I needed to, although some of the investment related income I still find difficult to wrap my head around. The biggest reason I haven’t (aside from being worried about making a mistake) is just that I haven’t wanted to spend the extra time on it. Sure, I have to wait a bit longer to get started, but then all I need to do is plug in the numbers.

This year a few more forms were able to be automatically imported… hopefully soon they all will be and then I won’t need to wait for any of it.

Anonymous Coward says:

bad guy here...

I used TurboTax, plan to do it again next year.

As far as I can tell, citizens are only going to say they want change in Government without voting for it.

Last I check the vast majority of “brain” children in the USA voted for an R or D. I see no reason to have hope, there is no chance I will beat back the throngs of stupid that infests humanity.

I say we go full on democracy so we can get straight to the suicide part!

Jason says:

Re: How does a law make something permanent?

A future law could easily undo this, regardless of the presence of the word "permanent". (Is that word actually in the law itself, or just the description of it?)

You also often hear about making some law or other "permanent" (e.g., tax cuts) in situations where all that’s really being done is the existing law has a defined expiration date and they’re taking that away so it doesn’t automatically expire. Either way, if Congress made a law, Congress can get rid of it; the Constitution is meant to be the only "permanent" bedrock underneath everything.

Honestly in my opinion it’s the "temporary" things that are more insidious. "How can we let this vital [whatever] expire, we have to renew it!" I can’t remember where I heard the saying, but it seems to be true: there’s nothing so permanent as a temporary law.

Jason says:

Re: Re: How does a law make something permanent?

A future law could easily undo this

Well, to be fair that isn’t exactly true. Poor choice of words… What I meant was that a law can be repealed, whether or not it’s meant to be permanent when it’s originally passed.

But in reality there can be any number of reasons why repealing a law can be complicated and problematic, especially if it sets up an ecosystem of side effects that aren’t easily undone. (Witness the mess going on regarding the current health care situation.)

So what I should have said was that a future law could repeal this law, since there isn’t any way to create an un-repealable law. For those kinds of things you’d have to amend the Constitution.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...