Australia's Prime Minister Supports Expanded Safe Harbor Protections Down Under

from the good-news dept

The history of copyright law in Australia is somewhat tortured, with the government there far too often bending the knee to entertainment industries both local and abroad. Still, while much of this history is fraught with protectionism reared intentionally, one of the more curious aspects of Australian copyright law appears to have originated as something of an accident. That aspect is that the kind of safe harbor protections that exist in America are rather limited in Australia. Specifically limited to commercial ISPs, as opposed to websites or institutions that provide internet access generally speaking. We'll get a bit more into how this came to be in a moment. We'll start instead with news that recently offered amendments to copyright law in the country that would shore up safe harbor protections more generally have received the support of Australian Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull.

To solve this problem and put Australia on a similar footing to technology companies operating in the United States, proposed amendments to the Copyright Act will see all of the above receiving enhanced safe harbor protections while bringing the country into compliance with AUSFTA.

But for now, momentum appears to be shifting in favor of the technology platforms. A report in The Australian (paywall) indicates that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has given the safe harbor amendments his support. It won’t be all plain sailing from here, however.

And that rocky road to harmonizing Australian copyright law with the EU and America is being laid by the usual entertainment industry suspects, whose objections are familiar tropes. Music and entertainment groups are complaining that offering safe harbor protections to such unworthy entities as schools and libraries, along with websites like Google and Facebook, amounts to codifying piracy. That's silly for all the reasons you should already know, but which can be best stated as it being quite dumb, and immoral, to saddle a third party with the guilt of a pirate just because it's an easier and more lucrative target. Because that's all this opposition amounts to: the desire to sue a school if a student infringes copyright. Or Google. Or a museum that provides internet access. This is what the entertainment industry wants to go to bat over.

But this gets really dumb when you consider that the lack of safe harbor protections in question was the result essentially of a poor choice of words over a decade ago.

The problem in Australian arose in the implementation of AUSFTA when the term “carriage service provider” (a technical terms for telecommunications companies and ISPs) was used rather than the wider “service provider” definition in the treaty.

“This places Australia at a competitive disadvantage” says Trish Hepworth. “Australian providers of common activities - transmitting data, caching, hosting and referring users to an online location – lack the protections and certainties enjoyed by their overseas competitors. It places schools, universities and libraries in a risky position as they go about their everyday business. ”

Reformers have been trying for ten years to correct this error, but they have been stymied at every turn by entrenched industry lobbyists. But now, with the Prime Minister throwing his weight behind expanded protections, there's a road map for a change in the law. The Australian government will be holding Senate hearings to debate the amendments, and you can be sure that the entertainment industry will be well represented within them, but a PM endorsement is a big deal. Hopefully our Aussie friends will get this right.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 17 Mar 2017 @ 11:52am

    Totally different. Really.

    And that rocky road to harmonizing Australian copyright law with the EU and America is being laid by the usual entertainment industry suspects, whose objections are familiar tropes.

    Of course when it comes to 'harmonization' that involves ratcheting up copyright to 'better match the laws is other countries' then I imagine they're all for it, it's just when that 'harmonization' comes in the form of helping the public that it's suddenly a bad thing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 17 Mar 2017 @ 12:39pm

      Re: Totally different. Really.

      I thought only China harmonized things. Oh wait.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      ECA (profile), 17 Mar 2017 @ 12:39pm

      Re: Totally different. Really.

      WEll,
      its also the Land of USA corps running around Taking/getting people that Dont know any better, to sign contracts to control There Music/movies in Other nations..
      Not knowing their rights, and responsibilities, as WELL as HOW to read those contracts, reminds me of the Early days in the USA, where most actors/artists HAD NO POWER..

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 17 Mar 2017 @ 12:35pm

    tHIS IS..

    This is a war zone..
    Its the intersection of USA and Asia movie industry..
    You have religious groups from EVERYWHERE..including Muslims..
    THIS can be a No-mans land for Music/Movies/Games, and harbor for All things..
    Or a Restricted area, So TIGHT you couldn't Make a Dollar by giving things away FREE..

    Things change So fast, from Each Elected official to WHO PAYS WHOM.. that if you turn you Head and COUGH, all the laws change..(concerning Music/Movies/Games AND GUNS)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Capt ICE Enforcer, 17 Mar 2017 @ 3:59pm

    Protection Down Under

    OMG. I thought a condom company hacked Techdirt for a few minutes after reading the title. Expanded Safe Harbor Protection Down under. Lol

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Mar 2017 @ 5:31pm

    Fun fact - the PM was a serious player in the early days of the Australian ISP industry:
    "OzEmail was a major Internet service provider (ISP) in Australia ... Malcolm Turnbull, later Prime Minister, was then chairman of OzEmail ... Malcolm Turnbull purchased a stake in Ozemail in 1994 for $500,000 and sold his stake for $57 million in 1999 to WorldCom."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OzEmail

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2017 @ 7:16am

    Getty goes Ga-Ga

    Getty has gone Ga-GA down under over Safe Harbor.

    https://torrentfreak.com/getty-images-slams-google-for-seeking-copyright-safe-harbor-170320/

    N ot gonna wait for TechDirt to eventually catch up on the latest so you get a link instead.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer
Anonymous number for texting and calling from Hushed. $25 lifetime membership, use code TECHDIRT25
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.