Guy Who Wants Everyone To Believe He Created Bitcoin, Now Patenting Everything Bitcoin With An Online Gambling Fugitive

from the because-reasons dept

As you may recall, there was a giant fuss last year, when an Australian guy named Craig Wright not only claimed that he was "Satoshi Nakamoto" -- the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin -- but had convined key Bitcoin developer Gavin Andresen that he was Nakomoto. That was a big deal because Andresen was one of the first developers on Bitcoin and regularly corresponded with Nakamoto (Andresen's own name sometimes popped up in rumors about who Nakamoto might be). Even with Andresen being convinced, plenty of others soon picked apart the claims and found the claims severely lacking in proof.

Then, last summer, Andrew O'Hagan published an absolutely massive profile of Wright that only served to raise a lot more questions about Wright, his businesses, his claims to having created Bitcoin, and a variety of other things. However, as we noted at the time, buried in that massive article was a bizarre tidbit about how Wright was actively trying to patent a ton of Bitcoin related ideas. As we noted, the article stated that Wright's plan was to patent tons of Bitcoin stuff, reveal himself as Nakamoto and then sell his patents for a billion dollars.

Of course, part of that plan fizzled because basically no one believes Wright was Nakamoto. But, apparently the patenting has continued. Earlier this months, Reuters released a big "investigation" showing that Wright is rushing to get as many Bitcoin-related patents as possible, and has partnered with an online gambling mogul who's a fugitive because of his business dealings (add this to the long list of sketchy connections between Wright and other businesses):

Craig Wright, the Australian computer scientist who made the Satoshi claim, has the backing of Calvin Ayre, a wealthy Canadian entrepreneur, according to people close to Wright and documents reviewed by Reuters. Ayre has been indicted in the United States on charges of running online gambling operations that are illegal in many U.S. states – an accusation he rejects.

Wright’s expertise combined with Ayre’s support make a potentially formidable force in shaping the future of bitcoin and blockchain, the ledger technology that underlies digital currencies. Wright and his associates have lodged more than 70 patent applications in Britain and have plans to file many more, according to documents and emails reviewed by Reuters and sources with knowledge of Wright’s business. The patents range from the storage of medical documents to WiFi security, and reflect Wright's deep knowledge of how bitcoin and blockchain work.

Their total compares with 63 blockchain-related patents filed globally last year and 27 so far this year by multinationals from credit card companies to chipmakers, according to Thomson Innovation.

And, because it's patents we're talking about, there's a shell company here, because shell companies are quite popular in the patent trolling world. But Reuters claims that Ayre and Wright are behind this particular shell company and point to lots of close connections between the two. The report further notes that there are plans to file 150 patent applications, and maybe up to 400, and again repeats the claim from last year about the "ONE BILLLLLLLLLION DOLLARS!" sales plan:

The range of patent applications lodged by Wright and colleagues is wide. Five, registered on Dec. 14, were made by EITC Holdings with the bland description “computer-implemented method and system,” public filings show. One, registered on Dec. 28, was described as “Determining a common secret for two blockchain nodes for the secure exchange of information” - apparently a way to use the blockchain to exchange encrypted data. Other applications by Wright and his associates relate to sports betting and a blockchain-based operating system for simple electronic devices.

Emails from Wright to Ayre’s associate Matthews, reviewed by Reuters, set out plans to file 150 patents. A person with direct knowledge of Wright’s businesses said he and associates ultimately aim to file closer to 400. None has been approved so far and it’s not clear whether the patents would be enforceable if granted, but Wright’s associates have been quoted as saying the patents could be sold “for upwards of a billion dollars.”

The Reuters article argues that this "rush to patent applications poses a threat to the original conception of bitcoin as a technology available to all." Of course, that also seems like a pretty big strike against the idea that Wright is Nakamoto.

But it also seems like a misunderstanding about patents themselves. First off, just because you file for a ton of patents, it doesn't mean you're going to get them. And, thankfully, lately the USPTO has actually gotten much, much better at rejecting really bad patents. These things may be worth talking about if he's actually granted these patents -- and, even then, it may only really matter if he (or any later holder of the patents) seeks to enforce them. The really crazy thing, though, is that this once again demonstrates the sheer silliness of our patent system. Rather than actually trying to build a viable business by leveraging the useful features of Bitcoin/blockchain, you have someone trying to lock it up by putting tollbooths wherever possible. Tons of work is being done to advance Bitcoin and blockchain these days, because of all the opportunities it will create... not because of patents. And, once again, it shows the folly of believing that patents are a key incentive for innovation. That's rarely the case. Often, they're a key incentive for putting hurdles in the way of actual innovations, so that you can shake the actual innovators down for cash.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 24 Mar 2017 @ 11:33am

    Obligatory remark

    I invented EMAIL.

    Ahem.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    GMacGuffin (profile), 24 Mar 2017 @ 11:37am

    ... and also ...

    Satoshi Nakamoto is believed to hold about ฿1M (1 million bitcoin) across various wallets, which at the current price is just under "ONE BILLLLLLLLLION DOLLARS!"

    And yet that much btc just sits there on the blockchain. Yeah, Wright is Nakamoto for sure...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2017 @ 7:02pm

      Re: ... and also ...

      If I had one million Bitcoin I'd start slowly selling them and retire not file a bunch of patents in hopes that I could make money from the patents.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2017 @ 1:07pm

    Doen't prior publication by several years invalidate these patent applications?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Shiva Ayyadurai, 24 Mar 2017 @ 1:16pm

      Re:

      No.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      The Wanderer (profile), 25 Mar 2017 @ 4:55am

      Re:

      Part of that would probably be addressed by his claim to have been the person who created Bitcoin in the first place, and thus the person who invented these things, and therefore the one who would have been entitled to patent them anyway.

      Even leaving that aside, it's an unfortunate apparent fact that some patent offices (including, apparently, USPTO) look for prior art only in existing patents or patent applications - not in things that no one has tried to patent. This means that if you invent something and don't try to patent it, someone else can come in later and apply for a patent on it, and the patent examiners won't notice that your invention is already out there - no matter how famous your invention may by that point be.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    I.T. Guy, 24 Mar 2017 @ 1:19pm

    "First off, just because you file for a ton of patents, it doesn't mean you're going to get them."
    Just most of them. And the ones that get rejected, ahhh... just change a few words around and add "on the internet" and blammo!!! Patents granted.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    buybtc, 24 Mar 2017 @ 1:44pm

    BUY BTC WHILE IT's LOW. Special promo prices if you register with this link when available!
    https://www.buysomebitcoins.com/?wYn

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2017 @ 2:10pm

    So many patents

    How can someone file for so many patents. Many years ago I read that it costs $10,000 per patent. So how can someone do that and not file for bankruptcy?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2017 @ 2:59pm

    The escalating patent war will likely kill Bitcoins

    These patents will be countered with others. Patent trolls will use both to extract prohibitive licensing fees. Endless litigation will ensue. Deep-pocketed investors will be willing to pursue 50 lawsuits, lose 8, settle on 30, and win 12, because the exchange will be profitable. The same patent thicket that has paralyzed the mobile phone market will paralyze this -- only much faster, because patent trolls have gotten better at what they do.

    It won't matter who invented it, who funds the litigation, who wins, who loses: the point is that the entire technology is about to buried under an avalanche. A few will profit. Everyone else will lose.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 24 Mar 2017 @ 5:01pm

    Patents...

    turn it into Shitcoin.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Abolitionist, 25 Mar 2017 @ 7:40pm

    Abolish patents.

    The sooner the better.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Manok, 26 Mar 2017 @ 8:31am

    Y so complicated?

    If he was the real Nakamoto, he didn't need to go through all this hassle to earn a bilion.... he'd just sell the 1 million bitcoins he's holding.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chuck, 26 Mar 2017 @ 9:49am

    Not like it's going to do him much good...

    I mean, after all, let's say he successfully wins and gets a verdict. How's the defendant gonna pay him?

    In Bitcoin, I presume?

    Then what happens when he successfully sues every single person with Bitcoin? Who cashes him out? Or is he just gonna sit there on a stack of Bitcoins with nobody left to convert them into actually spendable money?

    And even if someone sticks around and is willing to hand him real money for these Bitcoins, then what? They'll have literally zero monetary value so he'll get cashed out for like $10 USD.

    I mean, he SERIOUSLY hasn't thought this through, has he?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.