Germany's Spy Agency Walks Away From Three-Year Investigation With Expanded Spy Powers

from the when-getting-to-the-bottom-of-something-means-lightly-scratching-the-surface dept

Netzpolitik -- once on the receiving end of treason charges for reporting on leaked documents -- is marking the end of the so-called "inquiry" into the BND-NSA partnership with a post discussing the inquiry's multiple failures. The German government's investigation into Five Eyes spy efforts was a direct result of leaked Snowden documents, which showed the NSA had spied on the German chancellor.

It failed to uncover much about that particular allegation. By the time this part of the investigation had been dropped, President Obama had already apologized for the NSA doing perfectly normal NSA-type stuff: spying on foreign officials. The committee turned to a broader discussion of surveillance best practices, including the propriety of spying on friends and neighbors. In doing so, it uncovered plenty of illicit and ill-advised spying by its NSA equivalent, BND.

Netzpolitik has a full list of BND's questionable surveillance targets, including friendly foreign officials, journalists, EU officials, the UN, human aid organizations, banks, rating agencies, and a number of American companies. (Do unto others, etc.)

But when it came to actually examining BND's tactics and programs, the committee opted to dwell on legal minutia.

Quite some time was spent on the question of when which sub-division manager in BND knew of which selector and to whom he reported it or why he didn’t and whether someone was present at a meeting in the chancellery on 24th of October 2013 or not or was it the 28th… No wonder sometimes only a dozen people witnessed the public hearings until late at night.

It's a great way to talk around the issues, rather than addressing them. Netzpolitik felt the pain personally, as its reporters attended the public hearings and transcribed all 5.6 million characters of undisturbed bushes idly observing nearby beatings.

This was not entirely the tribunal's fault, however. As soon as it became apparent surveillance partnerships were going to be discussed, BND's Five Eyes partners began issuing ultimatums.

The committee was only allowed to investigate a few discontinued and outdated joint operations between the German spy agency BND and the Five Eyes: Eikonal in Frankfurt and Glotaic. But the name "Glotaic" could not even be spoken, because it includes the partner's name "CIA". Just like operation "Monkeyshoulder", which was planned with British GCHQ. This could not be mentioned at all, as the UK threatened to end any spy cooperation. The committee would be responsible for terrorist attacks, they said.

The committee is now in the process of writing a report that few will see, much less read. A public version will likely be presented, short on specifics and long on assertions of lawful authority and rigorous oversight. It's basically up to leakers to provide the public with the reality of the situation. And much of what the committee managed to uncover has been glossed over... or codified.

The consequences to those revelations amount to the next scandal. Instead of adjusting the spying to the law, the laws are adjusted to the spying. One year before the end of the committee, the grand coalition passed a reform of the BND law. With this change, everything that the BND is doing, is legalized – and even expanded.

The committee found that the NSA spies on its "friends" just as often as BND does. The examination of 14 million shared intercepts turned up 40,000 "friendlies." Notably, the committee was not allowed to review these intercepts. It was just supposed to take the single reviewer's word on the percentage of "friendly" NSA targets.

Taking a look at its own intercepts, BND found 3,300 "participants" linked to 15,000 "selectors" in its "friendlies" file. This means German officials like Merkel will find it difficult to feign anger at the NSA's friendly spy targets.

Not that any of this matters, at least not in the short run. As Netzpolitik points out, while the committee was busy discussing the few things it could discuss, the German parliament was expanding BND's legal authorities.

German citizens -- along with everyone the government spies on -- can rest assured nothing has changed. It's only gotten worse. The final report may provide more examples of BND's misconduct, but the agency has already been rewarded for its misbehavior by the same officials charged with holding the agency accountable for its abuses.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 4:50am

    what's good for the goose

    Which country doesn't have spies - raise your hand.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 6:24am

    Same old same old.

    "But when it came to actually examining BND's tactics and programs, the committee opted to dwell on legal minutia."

    Another whitewash. Same old same old.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 6:26am

    Re: what's good for the goose

    Which country doesn't have spies - raise your hand.

    Huh? Which country is claiming not to?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 6:58am

    it's like nurse ratchet. she can never get better, and however she gets worse, it can never be undone.

    internet and its easy spying links arm-and-harm with the nuke. they'll be with us from now until they do their part in our undoing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 8:54am

    "You're not allowed to investigate because our partners will withdraw from the agreement."
    Partner spy agency to their oversight committee: "They'll withdraw if you investigate! You can't put us at risk like that!"

    Can anyone think of a reason that couldn't happen?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 8:54am

    "You're not allowed to investigate because our partners will withdraw from the agreement."
    Partner spy agency to their oversight committee: "They'll withdraw if you investigate! You can't put us at risk like that!"

    Can anyone think of a reason that couldn't happen?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Mar 2017 @ 8:55am

    Of course the Germans and British would name a spy operation (Monkeyshoulder) after alcohol...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    trump vader, 3 Mar 2017 @ 2:46am

    is it time to leak there spy cdrs

    last time it was the local cops wifi spying cdrs ......

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.