It's Official: Sixteen Government Agencies Now Have Access To Unminimized Domestic NSA Collections

from the Security-Thru-Advanced-Situational-Intelligence dept

The NSA can now be used for second-hand domestic surveillance, thanks to new rules approved by President Obama that went into effect on January 3rd. Those unhappy to see Trump in control of these expanded powers have no one to thank but their outgoing president for this parting gift.

This was first reported early last year, gathered from anonymous intelligence community sources and the now-useless PCLOB's report on the FBI's use of unminimized intelligence passed on to it by the NSA. At that point, it was mostly speculation, with the PCLOB's report being the only thing in the way of factual information. The administration was confirmed to be working towards loosening restrictions on data sharing, even as the FBI was swearing it was tightening up control of its own use of unminimized data.

As the New York Times reports, this change in rules on data-sharing is now in place, as confirmed by a declassified copy of the new procedures [PDF] released to the paper.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The perceived benefit of this relaxation of the rules is this: government agencies will no longer have to worry about being siloed off from possibly relevant info by restrictions on unminimized collections. The downside is, well… everything else.

Previously, the N.S.A. filtered information before sharing intercepted communications with another agency, like the C.I.A. or the intelligence branches of the F.B.I. and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.

There are sixteen(!) government agencies being made equal partners in the NSA's full-take surveillance programs. Rather than place the agency that hoovers up the signals intelligence in charge of ensuring the privacy of US citizens is protected, the administration is letting multiple agencies with different agendas and rulesets have access to the data first, with any minimization being left up to each agency's individual policies.

The NSA still retains the option to deny an agency's request to an unminimized "feed" of incoming collections, but it's likely denials will be few and far between -- what with the Wars on Terror/Drugs still ongoing and showing no signs of wrapping up anytime soon. Anything deemed to be tangentially-related to national security will likely receive the NSA's blessing... because doing otherwise would be incredibly hypocritical. The "national security" mantra has been deployed to excuse its worst excesses. Far be it from the NSA to deny the national security "needs" of other agencies similarly situated.

This was pretty much confirmed by ODNI's counsel Bob Litt's attempt to defuse the situation when it first came to light last spring. His painful editorial at Just Security said this was all no big deal. After all, the new rules didn't provide for more domestic surveillance than the government was already performing. It just allowed more agencies to look at what was already being collected and do with it what they wanted. SHRUG.

As for the FBI, which has been a longtime partner in the NSA's surveillance haul, its new internal rules are no longer relevant, seeing as the administration has given its blessing to go ahead and use supposedly foreign-facing intelligence programs for domestic law enforcement activity. While the FBI was supposed to restrict its use of the data haul for counter-terrorist investigations, the FBI was able to turn over anything it found related to normal criminal activity to the DOJ. So, even prior to the official relaxation, the FBI was acting as a conduit between the NSA and other law enforcement agencies.

All of this means the NSA is now officially a domestic surveillance agency, even if a majority of its exploration of Americans' data/communications is being done by proxy.

Filed Under: 4th amendment, domestic surveillance, law enforcement, minimized data, nsa, president obama, privacy, surveillance

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Protectors, Tyrants and In Betweens, 13 Jan 2017 @ 1:25pm

    How Else will we catch terrorists?

    It's the duty of the state to protect its people from amorphous terrorism, despite the futility of the task.

    Obviously, the only way to do this, is to collect bulk communications and Ctrl+F for stuff to find terrorists, 0days, and spies. Sure, all that information just so happened to get passed onto all other agencies trying to bust drug users, drug dealers, tax evaders, likely surveillance of political dissidents, pedophiles, blackmail and nudes... sure, we've yet to see a public piece of the NSA admitting to stopping some terrorist with this technology, but they'd probably lie about it anyway.

    To those of you within the Federal Government reading this comment, understand this; many people need your help, and many don't. What drives you? Ultimate knowledge? Duty? Money? Prestige? Fetish? Why not take a job at a private company? Do you remember your oath? Do you honor it? Do your superiors?

    To this day, no (publicly known) CIA employee has seen trial for any of the terrible murders, tortures, blackmails, or worse that have been committed, despite admissions and overwhelming evidence of criminal actions. I think maybe one dude got caught selling weapons to Libyans?

    I have evolved my stances over the years. I'm no longer thinking there is no place for surveillance. Other nations will do it to us. We must do it to the. Other nations will spy on our citizens, and we must spy on theirs. However, to what end should this information be used? Do we need to be busting drug dealers? Do we need to be putting people in prison for their use of drugs? Do we need to be disseminating child pornography through federal agencies in order to catch pedophiles? Do we need to have federal agencies disseminating drugs and participating in cartels? We can pretend as if this isn't happening, but historical precedent and common sense dictates that humans are human. Power is enticing and there's too much secrecy protecting the truth, the reality of the situation.

    What do you say if someone down the line, a decade, two decades, or ten decades seizes this level of power over the planet that is such a moral relativist that truly terrible things happen? This type of surveillance and widespread intentional obsolescence should be done away with if our precedent is to not treat this like it's National Security. It's being used more as a way to catch drug dealers and military dominance. As if dominance is the only path to survival and power. It's one thing to protect people, and another to intentionally make them vulnerable to spite your "enemy". Some of these agencies are acting illegally, yet nothing really changes. We know other nations will do anything and everything, therefore, we may do anything and everything.

    What a pessimistic and unrealistic outlook of humanity we have today.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.