Single Choke Point Problems: Apple Removes NY Times App From Chinese App Store After Chinese Gov't Complains
from the censorship-made-easy dept
One of the wonders of the internet was that it was supposed to be a distributed computer system, meaning that it would be harder to take down and harder to censor. But, over time, things keep getting more and more centralized. And that's especially true in the mobile ecosystem, and doubly so for the Apple iOS mobile ecosystem (at least on Android it's much easier to sideload apps). The latest demonstration of this is that Apple agreed to remove apps from the NY Times from its iOS app store in China, complying with demands from the Chinese government:Apple removed both the English-language and Chinese-language apps from the app store in China on Dec. 23. Apps from other international publications, including The Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal, were still available in the app store.The article about this -- in the NY Times, naturally -- says that the paper has asked Apple to reconsider. No one is clear on exactly why this is happening, but the (reasonable) assumption is that it has to do with the new regulations China put in place over the summer that demand all internet news providers must be approved by the Chinese government -- which the Chinese are spinning as part of its effort to crack down on "fake news."
“We have been informed that the app is in violation of local regulations,” Fred Sainz, an Apple spokesman, said of the Times apps. “As a result, the app must be taken down off the China App Store. When this situation changes, the App Store will once again offer the New York Times app for download in China.”
Of course, this really just highlights two separate, but equally worrisome trends: (1) the increasing centralization of connected ecosystems, that creates a single chokepoint to target with censorship demands; and (2) the ability to use hyped up claims about "fake news" to censor legitimate and critical investigative reporting. Neither of these are good to see, and both need to be counteracted.
Filed Under: app store, censorship, china, news
Companies: apple, ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Chinese goverment want to control where and how it's people get the news , the sanitized version and any outside news sources not controlled by China are not on that list.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
More like "If you don't want all your factories shut down and confiscated, comply."
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is why I refuse to purchase/use any Apple product.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
AOL 2.0
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The other alternatives, Blackberry and Windows Phone, are dead. (The Blackberry name now licenced to a Chinese company for Android phones, and Windows Phones - at least here in Canada - long disappeared from stores and cellular providers.)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
An Android app can only do what it has permissions to do. In order to have a certain permission, for example, to look at your contacts (eg, phone / address book), the app must:
1. expressly declare the permission it wants (otherwise the OS rejects attempts to use this part of the API)
2. declare whether it wants the permission granted at install time or upon first use of that feature
3. The user must expressly grant permission ("yes, I want to give application SpamMyFriends access to my contacts list").
The user is asked to grant that permission either when the app is installed, or the first time the app attempts to use that permission.
So yes, on Android, an app can compromise your privacy, if you want to give it permission to.
On the newest releases of Android you can revoke these permissions later. For example, a flashlight app that uses the camera's flash LED as a light. No reasonable flashlight app should need:
* access to my contacts list
* ability to record sounds
* ability to prevent phone from sleeping
* access to your files, music, photos, etc.
* internet access
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Wonder how long they can keep the fact that they're THIS CLOSE to a revolution a secret from their own people?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
That'll probably change by the end of my current contract. Apple finally managed to drag me into their store in the local mall last fall. Though it was kind of unpleasant to wake up with a blowgun dart in the back of my neck.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
First they came for the NY Times...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Doing business in China comprises all of what you both said. China is clearly a heavy regulation government. You only get the freedoms they decide for you to have.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sounds like Google has some suck-up catching up to do if it wants to keep up with Apple.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
China wants control over what is able to be seen in their country, and they will do what is needed. Already, they have structured their internet connections to the world in such a way that they can easily control the content through firewalls and such. China could probably pull the plug on all external links and still operate an internet of their own, they are that well structured. Russia is jealous!
Apps are the next frontier. Information can flow into an app that isn't as easily packet scanned and detected. Without another way to control those apps, the best way for China to handle it is to make the app unavailable in China. Since they can't control the content, they control the delivery.
It really isn't a big deal, it's the same reason why CNN randomly goes off the air in China when something important happens.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
iOS 11 Release Date
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply