Albuquerque Police Officers, Supervisors Accused Of Deleting, Altering Video Of Use Of Force Incidents

from the we-control-the-vertical dept

The most famous recording of Albuquerque police in action shows them shooting and killing a homeless man -- a shooting that began as a normal rousting for the crime of "illegal camping." From there, the police turned it into a "standoff" with a cooperative person unsure of which direction to move next out of the very justifiable fear of being shot.

This was just another in a long line of killings by APD officers, not many of which were captured on video. The DOJ issued a report stating that a "majority" of shootings by the city's police officers were "unreasonable and violated the Fourth Amendment."

The police department does have a variety of cameras in its possession, which should have generated a wealth of footage for examination by public records requesters, attorneys, and police supervisors -- just in case they wanted to get a handle on the PD's problematic deadly force usage. The Albuquerque Police Department has shot more citizens than the NYPD since 2010, despite policing a city sixteen times smaller.

The footage of use of force incidents is the PD's best-kept secret. A lawyer representing a family suing the city over the killing of Armand Martin by APD officers was given a copy of footage captured by the police. He was given password-protected files but not the password, despite repeated requests. In addition to representing the widow of Armand Martin, the law firm is now also engaged in an open records lawsuit against the city.

Apparently, the Albuquerque police department doesn't feel the city's doing enough to shield them from accountability. Sure, forcing records requesters to file lawsuits just to see public records is a good deterrent, but the only sure way to prevent incriminating recordings from ending up in the public's hands is to make sure said footage doesn't exist.

This goes far beyond simply tampering with devices or "forgetting" to activate them in crucial situations. According to an affidavit filed by a former police department employee, Albuquerque officers are tampering with the recordings that actually make their way back to the PD's cloud storage.

Three officers’ body camera videos that captured events surrounding the fatal shooting of 19-year-old suspected car thief Mary Hawkes in April 2014 were either altered or partially deleted, according to former police department employee Reynaldo Chavez’s nine-page affidavit.

[...]

Another allegation is that surveillance camera video from a salon showing Albuquerque police officers shooting Jeremy Robertson in June 2014 bore “the tell-tale signs that it has been altered and images that had been captured are now deleted. One of the deleted images captured the officers shooting Jeremy Robertson.” Robertson was a police informant and suspected probation violator.

The allegations contained in the affidavit [PDF] show APD officers aren't interested in the accountability that recordings could theoretically create. The former employee stated he had heard a police supervisor discussing making a camera's SD card "disappear." Supervisors also urged officers not to write reports until after viewing captured footage, and if the footage contained "problematic" uses of force, officers were told not to mention the recordings in the report or simply claim the equipment had malfunctioned.

No one from the department wants to go on record about these allegations. The only thing that has been confirmed is that anyone with admin privileges can alter or delete footage using the Evidence.com portal for its cloud storage services. Officers may have had little trouble erasing problematic footage or altering it into uselessness, but it's unlikely they've taken care to scrub Evidence.com activity logs. These are a key part of Chavez's claims and, unlike the recordings discussed here, they're likely still intact.

Chavez's affidavit also claims he was directed to stonewall requests and that city officials were more than happy to blow tax dollars on settlements, rather than turn over requested documents and footage.

In response to IPRA requests related to the deaths of James Matthew Boyd, Jeremy Robertson, and Mary Hawkes, Deputy City Attorney Kathy Levy, and/or a Deputy Chief, told me to deny, withhold, obstruct, conceal, or even destroy records from matters being produced in contravention of IPRA by:

A. telling me that records would not be released without any explanation other than "this won't be released" or words to that effect. Deputy City Attorney Kathy Levy frequently stated simply, "there are items we just will not release and we will just pay the fines or lawsuits."

B. Deputy City Attomey Levy told me to creatively identify an allowable exception to IPRA to withhold production of responsive public records in an effort to "baffle" or frustrate the requestor or otherwise burden them.

C. I was told to arbitrarily delay production of responsive public records without justification supporting such delay and to fabricate reasons to burden requestors with additional requirements when such requirements were not needed…

As we've seen far too often elsewhere, government entities believe transparency and accountability are forms of damage and actively search for ways to route around these obligations to the public. And given the allegations here, it appears the APD has no interest in cleaning itself up, not even with the DOJ looking over its shoulder.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 28 Nov 2016 @ 2:07pm

    Can't imagine why...

    As we've seen far too often elsewhere, government entities believe transparency and accountability are forms of damage and actively search for ways to route around these obligations to the public. And given the allegations here, it appears the APD has no interest in cleaning itself up, not even with the DOJ looking over its shoulder.

    Probably becase the DOJ is content to only 'look over it's shoulder', and has no interest in doing anything about their actions.

    When you know that your 'boss' has no interest in holding you accountable, the city has no interest in holding you accountable, you can stonewall and lie to the public all you want to hide your actions, and you happen to be staffed with murderous thugs who thoroughly enjoy unlimited power up to and including the ability to kill on a whim... yeah, not much incentive to shape up and do anything different.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jingoi, 28 Nov 2016 @ 2:50pm

    This is why I'll never trust the police or any of america's law enforcers ever again. No amount of manipulation of the news or rare reports of some police officer helping an homeless woman will trick me, I know its all controlled.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      art guerrilla (profile), 28 Nov 2016 @ 4:13pm

      Re: no, no, no, you don't unnerstan...

      um, this was the one and onliest time this kind of stuff has ever happened, ever...
      honest...
      we're really not lying now...
      just that one time...
      and, like look:
      we caught it ! ! !
      system worked ! ! !
      nothing to see here, now move along...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 3:16pm

    Perverting the course of justice

    Do you really not have any offence similar to "perverting the course of justice" in the United States ?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 3:18pm

    I'll say it again.

    Cops are racists. If your color isn't "blue," you are automatically viewed as neither human nor innocent.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John, 28 Nov 2016 @ 3:30pm

    Be safe

    I hope Reynaldo Chavez is keeping safe and never enters the Albuquerque Police district as I doubt he will survive an encounter with the police.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 3:32pm

    APD setting themselves up for local assassination

    As a foreign national, it appears that the APD is setting itself for retaliatory assassinations of APD members to be undertaken by the local citizenry. This is usually considered a bad idea by rational folks. But, then again, I don't suppose that anyone in the APD could be classified as rational only sentient like mosquitoes and flies.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Nov 2016 @ 2:07am

      Re: APD setting themselves up for local assassination

      While that is a terrible/grim idea for the amount of bloodshed it will bring to both the citizenry and the police as they lash out in revenge. We seem to be headed that way, Too often we get glimpses on how systematically corrupt law enforcement is getting with too much a priority given to covering abuse and avoiding accountability rather than enacting reform and fixing issues.

      Sadly we are reaching a point where its not only the targeted minorities that keep getting shot by the police that have come to see the police as just another dangerous criminal gang to fear and avoid but the citizenry in general.

      At what point it becomes safer (in the minds of the citizens) to shoot any police officer that interacts with them out of fear for their safety? (Just like the police loves to claim when they inexplicably kill un-armed/compliant suspects) At the pace we are going we might be finding out sooner than later.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Nov 2016 @ 5:04am

        Re: Re: APD setting themselves up for local assassination

        A gang who not only has access to evidence against them, they are actively encouraged to delete it to prevent further payouts.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 5:29pm

    The Brotherhood

    Protect the brotherhood - Always
    Nothing is more important then the brotherhood.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 5:40pm

    Remember when Whatever was busy whining that body cameras were a horrible idea in practice, because police departments simply wouldn't have the time, expertise or manpower to look through the footage and edit it accordingly?

    Looks to me that the police have absolutely no trouble at all. Fancy that!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 7:37pm

    This is why we can't have nice cops.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 2:33am

    Cameras should be under court control at all times.

    An officer of the local courts should lock them on and hand
    them out to each officer on his way out of the locker room,
    then copy them to the cloud and lock both camera and data up
    at the end of every shift.

    Court officers should maintain control of all recordings at
    all times, right through court cases, and be the only ones
    deciding what to release to police or the public, under clear
    policies that prosecutors and police unions cannot manipulate.

    With all that taken out of their hands, police can concentrate
    on their jobs and stop worrying about bad cops ruining them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Nov 2016 @ 4:11am

      Re: Cameras should be under court control at all times.

      The police worries about bad cops ruining them?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Quiet Lurcker, 29 Nov 2016 @ 5:38am

      Re: Cameras should be under court control at all times.

      Re-read the quoted portions of the deposition. The author states that it was an attorney who instructed him to hide or otherwise make it difficult for people to get their hands on the recordings and information.

      if an attorney - an officer of the court - was involved, that means that likely the courts as a system are in it up to their respective eyeballs.

      What we need in this instance are three things:
      --civilian oversight of the equipment and recordings;
      --in any instance where the city doesn't IMMEDIATELY cough up responsive materials when requested, the courts MUST presume the accused in the associated case to be innocent; --and IMMEDIATE firing of anyone who tampers with the equipment/records, refuses to divulge the recordings/records promptly when asked, or encourages or supports either of those things, including by not immediately firing the offender. And while we're at it, let's include a lifetime ban on working in law enforcement for people who are fired under these provisions.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DigDuggery, 29 Nov 2016 @ 6:25am

      Re: Cameras should be under court control at all times.

      Copied to the internet, agreed.
      Locked up under control of the court? Not so much.
      Should be publicly available from the start.
      Could be their own youtube channel.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 12:01pm

        Locked up by a court…

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 12:05pm

        Locked up by a court……

        …means locked away from meddling police and prosecutors, so
        that FOIA requests can be granted quickly without delays or
        exorbitant fees and excessive delays.

        A court answers to no-one except superior courts and, occasionally,
        voters. ‌ This tends to favor a balance towards openness. ‌ ‌ ;]

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 5:04am

    Good ones do…

    …before they give up. ‌ Enough of those still exist.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Nov 2016 @ 8:05am

      Re: Good ones do…

      "Enough of those still exist."

      "Enough" for what? To field a national, policeman's softball team...with no replacements?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    andrew_duane (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 5:46am

    Maybe I'm just confused

    but why would an archival storage system for something that can by definition be considered evidence in legal cases allow people to log in and erase or alter that evidence?

    Even with an audit trail (which is implied), this just seems like madness. Every frame of footage uploaded should be 100% protected. During any trial that happens, the two sides are of course allowed to pick and choose exactly the frames they want to present to support their case.....

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Padpaw (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 1:42pm

      Re: Maybe I'm just confused

      From what I have gathered those in charge of this cities PD are encouraging their cops to go out and kill people.

      This system only makes sense if the ones running it want those under them to committ crimes.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Wendy Cockcroft, 30 Nov 2016 @ 5:57am

        Re: Re: Maybe I'm just confused

        Eh, not quite. You've got predatory cops who believe they are above the law and a system more interested in protecting its image than in sorting itself out.

        We see this privilege-v-prey story acted out in a number of scenarios, not all of which are as deadly.

        This is the problem with being over-privileged; you lose your ability to empathise with the "other" people, you consider yourself above them, you're indifferent to their suffering, you consider them a nuisance, after which it's only a matter of time till you see killing them (or letting them die) as pest control.

        This is why I rage at partisanship every time I see it; I can see the same pattern emerging in partisan thinking.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 6:52am

    So the evidence against the police was deleted or tampered with? All the involved are automatically considered guilty. See how fast things will change and cameras will work. Sure it's a bit overboard but in any case law enforcement should be held to much higher standards because they have a ton of power over the citizenry. If you don't keep them in a tight grip they WILL abuse that power.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    I.T. Guy, 29 Nov 2016 @ 7:12am

    Seems like a "few bad apples" have indeed spoiled the bunch.

    Methinks it's not the apples, the tree has gone bad.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Padpaw (profile), 29 Nov 2016 @ 1:36pm

    They have become a crime syndicate pretending to be police officers.

    Or the extreme would be they are terrorists holding the town of albuquerque hostage

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    King Wenceslas, 30 Nov 2016 @ 3:19am

    Separation of powers

    Police officers should not have admin privileges.

    End of.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Home Cooking Is Killing Restaurants
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.