Techdirt Podcast Episode 96: Death Knell For Software Patents

from the the-bell-tolls dept

Software patents have been dubious since their inception — not just in principle, but legally too. Past rulings have called their validity into serious question, and now an opinion from a prominent pro-patent judge has called for people to admit that they simply shouldn't exist. This week, we discuss what this opinion means for the (hopefully short) future of software patents.

New: Subscribe to the Techdirt Podcast on Google Play.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

Filed Under: cafc, patents, podcast, software patenets

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Marty Goetz, 26 Oct 2016 @ 1:22pm

    The Author is Living in his Own World

    The author must be kidding! He’s living in his own world. Inventions that have computer software in the Specifications section of a patent application are alive and well. And Judge Mayer is simply misinformed. To understand why the author is flat out wrong when the author fantasies “death knell for software patents” see my Oct 2016 article "50 Years of Controversy Rages On: A Closer Look at Computer-Implemented Inventions" in IPWatchdog.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.