MPAA Applauds Derailment of FCC Cable Box Competition Plan Because, Uh, Jobs!
from the overlords-of-nonsense dept
Last week we noted how the FCC had to scrap its plan to bring competition to the cable box after an unprecedented PR and disinformation campaign by the cable and entertainment industries. In short, using consultants, think tanks, payrolled politicians, a soundwall of misleading editorials and even the US Copyright Office, the cable industry was able to convince many in the press, public and even at the FCC that the plan would have ripped the planet off its very orbital access, violated copyright, eroded consumer privacy, and even harmed diversity programming.
In reality, the cable sector’s opposition was about two things: $21 billion in captive box rental revenues, and a fear of a loss of control. Being an expert in the latter, the MPAA of course was quick to issue a statement applauding the “delay” in the FCC’s proceeding:
“The MPAA is pleased that the FCC is taking more time, and we hope they use it to ensure any set-top box proposal remains consistent with copyright policy and avoids harming creators,? said MPAA Chairman and CEO Senator Chris Dodd, who emphasized that his organization, along with ?virtually the entire creative community? is ?standing up for copyright and the rights of creators.”
Except again, the cable box plan has nothing to do with copyright. The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to third party hardware vendors, resulting in more competition in cable boxes and ultimately more open and cheaper boxes. Because that might just give consumers a little more control, the MPAA joined the hissy fit parade of inaccurate implausibilities. And to justify trying to keep the cable box locked down and shitty, the best the MPAA can apparently do is reiterate some nonsensical talking points about jobs:
“We support the FCC?s goal of promoting set-top box competition, but we continue to urge the Commission to forge a path that does not undermine the creative economy,? Dodd continued. ?Copyright employs more than 5.5 million U.S. workers and generates over $1 trillion in economic value ? incentivizing innovation and investment in creative works enjoyed by millions around the world.”
Except the FCC’s proposal wouldn’t hurt jobs in the slightest. Under the FCC’s plan, customers still would pay for cable, they’d just have more flexibility in how that programming is consumed. And if anything, you’d see more jobs as the cable hardware itself was opened to multiple hardware competitors and streaming vendors looking to make headway in the space. But just like their previous whining session on this subject, the MPAA can’t just admit it’s terrified of evolution and consumer empowerment, so it apparently has to conflate “copyright” with a loss of control.
Meanwhile, while many media outlets continue to insist this plan is simply on hold, there’s really only two likely outcomes moving forward thanks to cable lobbyists, the US Copyright Office, and folks like the MPAA: either the plan gets scrapped entirely, or the end result winds up being so watered down as to be utterly useless.
Filed Under: competition, copyright, fcc, set top boxes, stb
Companies: mpaa
Comments on “MPAA Applauds Derailment of FCC Cable Box Competition Plan Because, Uh, Jobs!”
It just speeds up cord cutting
Lack of competition. Crap set top boxes. Lock in. High prices for the poor boxes.
It just speeds up cord cutting.
Put the dinosaurs out of their misery faster.
The MPAA will end up wanting to sell their movies on the streaming services.
Re: It just speeds up cord cutting
What streaming services will those be, after the cable companies have shut up shop?
Re: Re: It just speeds up cord cutting
There will always be a market for internet. It is only in the feeble minds of Cable companies that they are the only one who can fill that need.
Re: It just speeds up cord cutting
“…off it’s very oribtal access…“
I’m pretty sure you meant axis.
Also, ‘unprecedented’? Was there something to set this hoopla aside from their previous tantrums, or is that just poetic license?
Re: Re:
I dunno, maybe the cable companies are just a branch of the Ur-Quan, and by refusing to be their thralls we pissed them off and they’ve locked Earth behind a shield.
Re: Re: NeghVar comment as signed out URL
by Kal Zekdor
“I dunno, maybe the cable companies are just a branch of the Ur-Quan, and by refusing to be their thralls we pissed them off and they’ve locked Earth behind a shield.”
Star Control 2. My favorite PC game of all time
Open source cable boxes will destroy the content creators…Where have I heard this from? Movies…radio…It’s on the tip of my tongue…
Who own what?
This ruling merely clarifies ownership. Cable owns the balls of the FCC members.
But Think of the Children!
Are you sure it wasn’t because of… the children… or terror… or one of the other go-to’s?
Why does anyone listen to numbers from a group that has its own special accounting system?
Re: Re:
Because the ‘numbers’ they hand out to their ‘friends’ tend to be rather large.
Is copyright hiring? I’d like to work for copyright.
The MPAA does NOT defend “creators”/”creative community”. “Copyright” is not a person. It’s all bullshit. Fuck off and die!
Sharing is....
You *know* they can’t give that information to third parties because it would be sharing. And sharing = PIRACY!!!
5.5 million jobs? Where? When? I vaguely remember someone saying such nonsense but when asked didn’t they enlist completely unrelated jobs as part of they’re employed?
I’m surprise they think a significant amount of the population will believe such thing, then again as they obviously own most news channels they might be able to pull another succesful misinformation campaign
Re: Re:
It comes from the same place as the RIAAs claim that piracy costs 74 TRILLION DOLLARZ PER YEAR!!! More than the entire GDP of the entire planet.
Missing Words???
“The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to third party hardware vendors”
I think some works were left out. Should it not say, “The rules would have simply required cable companies pass on their existing programming (and all DRM) to boxes made by third party hardware vendors”.
If they were required to pass it to the vendors, they would have a legitimate argument. Passing it to their customer via a box made by a third party, their argument is without foundation.
They will need to substantially raise rates once it becomes clear only the 1% can afford their services.
“MPAA Applauds Derailment of FCC Cable Box Competition Plan Because, Uh, Jobs!”
Weird, I thought Steve Jobs was dead.
In other news, the MAFIAA applauds the sacrifice of toddlers to the altar of copyright.
If the MPAA were a human, it would require a legal guardian
Every time the MPAA gets its way, potential jobs and entire potential industries disappear. If the MPAA’s original thesis about the VCR had been accepted, the U.S. film industry would’ve lost incalculable billions.
The Market Will Self-Correct, Right?
I’ve been waiting to hear back from the free market enthusiasts, who expect us to all to resort to their favoured tactic, voluntary withholding of continued support for these services, but the silence is deafening.
Can it be that, while we’re locked into contracts that run for up to 18 months AND there’s only one service provider due to regulatory capture, the market is too damn restricted to be able to self-correct?
If this isn’t tyranny, what is it?