After Nine Years Of Censorship, Canada Finally Unmuzzles Its Scientists

from the justin-trudeau-strikes-again dept

Here's something we don't see enough of here on Techdirt: a long and dispiriting saga with a happy ending. Over the years, we've reported on how Canada's previous prime minister, Stephen Harper, tried to stifle dissenting voices among government scientists and librarians, all of whom were expected to self-censor, even outside their work. But as most people know by now, the new Canadian administration under Justin Trudeau has a rather different style, and fortunately that also applies to how it treats its scientists. As an article in Nature reports, things may be moving too slowly for some, but at least they are moving:

the [Canadian] government is loosening its grip on communications but the shift at some agencies has not been as swift and comprehensive as many had hoped. And with the newfound freedom to speak, the full impact of the former restrictions is finally becoming clear. Canadian scientists and government representatives are opening up about what it was like to work under the former policy and the kind of consequences it had. Some of the officials who imposed the rules are talking about how the restrictions affected the morale and careers of researchers.
As well as filling in the background to this welcome move, Nature explores some of the stories that are starting to emerge, like this one:
During the 1970s, [Ian Stirling, a prominent biologist with Environment and Climate Change Canada] had gone to meetings in Canada that were also attended by Soviet scientists. The visiting researchers would arrive, he says, "with a KGB guy, who would stand there with no smiles, a scowl on his face and arms crossed". Stirling still finds it unbelievable that the Canadian government used similar tactics at conferences. In 2012, for example, the Canadian news outlet CBC reported that media minders had shadowed scientists from Environment Canada at a meeting of the International Polar Year in Montreal.
It's important to remember that Canada is not alone in having these muzzling problems. The article notes that during the administration of President George W. Bush, US government scientists complained that inconvenient data was being altered or simply suppressed. More recently, the UK government unveiled plans to forbid its scientists from lobbying for changes in their own field. Although it has now introduced some exemptions from the controversial "gagging clause", these seem half-hearted and possibly temporary. It obviously needs to pay more attention to Justin.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Paul Clark, 12 May 2016 @ 5:03am

    We Are Finally Dismantling the Previous Gov'ts Rights Violations

    The previous government in Canada was one that never allowed facts (or reality) to interfere with their ideology.

    This is just the beginning (I hope).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      A Liberal, 12 May 2016 @ 6:27am

      Re: We Are Finally Dismantling the Previous Gov'ts Rights Violations

      The previous government came to power not so much as a party popular for its own views but because of descent against the corrupt liberal party at the time. Majority didn't like their actual policies, but at least they were not corrupt. Whence they came to power, they started to act like the bigots they were.

      Good ridden, Justin has rebuilt the image of the liberal party, cleaned up the corrupt act and good for Canada that he did.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        crade (profile), 12 May 2016 @ 8:02am

        Re: Re: We Are Finally Dismantling the Previous Gov'ts Rights Violations

        Unfortunately that seems to be the way things work here, the govt is elected in more because people are pissed at the old one than because they think the new one is good.

        Also unfortunately, corruption is among the many things people complain about the Harper govt as well. They were just corrupt more the purpose of control and power rather than for money.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 12 May 2016 @ 5:48am

    Consequences

    Do you realize what could happen if scientists are allowed to openly state reason, facts, data and interpretations of data for just anyone to hear? Especially if those facts and data are inconvenient and undermine some vast profit making enterprises?

    How about a "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" science policy?

    Public statements on science can be announced by the government after consulting the bones or alternately chicken entrails if bones are not available.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 12 May 2016 @ 10:32am

      Re: Consequences

      Before you know it they'll be going around spouting such liberal non-sense as "evolution" and "global warming" and "smoking is bad for you" and "the Earth is round".

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 May 2016 @ 5:53am

    Now the bastard harper is a lobbyist for the very groups that bribed him while he was PM

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 May 2016 @ 6:10am

    This is suppression from a suppressive government.
    Manipulation of the beliefs of the population.
    Surely the sighs of an Evil Empire.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      BostonPilot (profile), 12 May 2016 @ 7:35am

      Re:

      I agree, if the people in the best position to call out inconvenient truths can be muzzled, it's a great way to control the voters.

      It should be a human right for scientists to make these statements whether that aligns with the current government's position or not, whether the scientist is funded by the government or not.

      We truly are living in bizzaro land.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 May 2016 @ 10:55am

    Scientists are no better than terrorists. All they want to do is impose their will on the rest of us, believing that their 'facts' and 'data' and 'analyses' have more validity than what the rest of us know to be true. Go ahead, show me even ONE case of science proving 'common sense gut feelings' to be wrong. Nothing but a nerd-endorsed, lab-coat-wearin' sharia law.

    Science says that rubbing myrrh on a duck won't make it go faster. Guess what? I've never seen it tried, but it sounds like it would, so there you go. Suck it, science.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    got_runs? (profile), 12 May 2016 @ 5:19pm

    Now only if college kids will stop suppressing free speech.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2016 @ 4:28am

    dc re

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.