FL Senate Candidate Tries To Edit Scientology Links From Wikipedia Page, Streisanding Those Links Everywhere

from the hail-thetan dept

You really would think people would know better by now when it comes to trying to surrepticiously edit Wikipedia pages to hide information, but they don't. There is a long history of people and companies trying to disappear or edit potentially embarrassing facts from Wikipedia, only to have it backfire directly in their faces via a little thing we call The Streisand Effect. And yet they still try.

The latest example of this is the Florida Senate Campaign for David Jolly attempting to simply delete his ties to the Church of Scientology from his Wikipedia page.

Sarah Bascom, Jolly’s spokesperson, confirmed that the campaign removed references to Jolly’s past career as a lobbyist, his association with the Church of Scientology, his support for same sex marriage, and political contributions he made to Democratic candidates. Bascom accused a unspecified rival campaign of adding what she described as “campaign propaganda” in the first place. Two edits were made — one on March 15 and one on April 4 — by a user named “Bascomcomm”. Bascom is the president of Bascom Communications & Consulting, a political firm in Florida.

“We were notified a few months ago that a consultant who works for one of our us senate [sic] opponents has been intentionally editing the David Jolly Wikipedia page to follow their opposition research messaging so they can use it in a mail or digital campaign,” Bascom told BuzzFeed News in an email. “Once we found about it, we went in and attempted to correct his page to be consistent with all of his public bios.”
Except that none of that appears to be true. By all accounts, the sections which Bascom's firm deleted from Jolly's Wikipedia page were heavily sourced and most of the contributions that were disappeared had been put into the page well over a year ago. It would take some Nostradamus-level seeing skills for a rival Senatorial prospect to edit Jolly's Wikepedia page to include damning information years in advance of the campaign actually taking place. And, even if we are dealing with a political prognosticator here, the sections were sourced. Note that nothing in the quote above suggests that the campaign was editing out lies. It only says that it edited the page to be consistent with Jolly's current public bio, that of a Republican senatorial candidate.

One section dealt with Jolly's long history with the Church of Scientology, including financial contributions he's gained from them and his attendance at political rallies hosted by the group. That was all replaced by the campaign with information detailing Jolly's work on flood insurance relief and his committment to reducing government spending. Another section detailed Jolly's career as a lobbyist, replacing that with his history of business ownership in the private sector. When Buzzfeed mentioned to Bascom that the original page contributions were done by long-time Wikipedia editors, in one case an award-winning editor, she repeated her claim that one of them worked for a rival's campaign. When asked to name that campaign?
“I have been told by numerous people who is behind it, but I can’t use that,” she said. “That would be unethical.”
Ah, yes, ethics. The most important of things, except when concerning trying to hide factual information from the public during an election cycle. How politician of you! And now that this has been sussed out, of course, we can all spend much time, energy, and screen-space discussing in volume all of the things that Jolly's campaign had tried to hide from us. The Streisand Effect is a bitter mistress, would-be Senator Jolly, and you've treated her poorly.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Baron von Robber, 7 Apr 2016 @ 1:42pm

    David Jolly, "I'm not a member of Scientology, is that clear?! ...........DOH!!"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Apr 2016 @ 1:59pm

    Anyone who thinks the MPAA is sleazy, read up Scientology. It makes Hollywood look like amateurs, and I would be extremely leery of any politician who took money from them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Apr 2016 @ 3:27pm

      Re:

      While all true, he's their representative, so it's not quite as bad as it appears -- he IS representing his constituents, (who include a lot of CoS players).

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Robert, 8 Apr 2016 @ 2:57am

        Re: Re:

        It's a good news bad news thing.
        Good news - it is now politically bad to be associated with the Church of Scientology, really bad and they know it.
        Bad news - none unless your are one of those raking in the cash at the top of what is left of the Church of Scientology.
        No scam lasts for ever and eventually those who organised the scam face justice.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Apr 2016 @ 2:20pm

    Seriously? Part of the guy's constituency is Clearwater. Of *course* he has to play nice with (and send money to) the Co$ - otherwise they'll find some other - er.... fine, upstanding member of the public to stand for public office instead of him.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Apr 2016 @ 4:04pm

    But Wikipedia provides no value, therefore, we can remove everything we don't like.

    /s

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 7 Apr 2016 @ 6:42pm

    Oh, he is soo getting kicked out.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Apr 2016 @ 2:04am

    *Linked in delicious with tag "DavidJolly" and "StreisandEffect"*

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Apr 2016 @ 10:43am

    Florida Man starts Edit War, claiming "Xenu Vult".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Apr 2016 @ 2:48pm

    Ethics? from a freakin' scientologist? those raping, paedophilic money stealing treasonous democracy-hating murdering sons of bitches would have to buy a dictionary just to know how to SPELL ethics.

    Oh yeah I forgot the bit about how the head of scientology [allegedly] seems to have 'disappeared' (i.e. murdered) his own wife because she wanted to leave the church.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.