Congressional Reps Tell NSA To Cease Sharing Unminimized Data With Domestic Law Enforcement Agencies

from the the-fed's-Big-Brother-program:-'adopt'-a-domestic-agency! dept

The FBI announced (without going into verifiable detail) that it had implemented new minimization procedures for handling information tipped to it by the NSA's Prism dragnet. Oddly, this announcement arrived nearly simultaneously with the administration's announcement that it was expanding the FBI's intake of unminimized domestic communications collected by the NSA.

So, which was it? Was the FBI applying more minimization or was it gaining more raw access? The parties involved have so far refused to offer any further details on either of the contradictory plans, save for vague assurances about the lawfulness of both options.

Fortunately, a few legislators have stepped up to do something about it. Megan Geuss of Ars Technica reports that Reps. Ted Lieu and Blake Farenthold have sent a letter to the NSA telling it to hold off on its plans to share unminimized data and communications with domestic intelligence agencies… at least until it's been discussed publicly.

We respectfully request you confirm whether the NSA intends to routinely provide intelligence information-collected without a warrant-to domestic law enforcement agencies. If the NSA intends to go down this uncharted path, we request that you stop. The proposed shift in the relationship between our intelligence agencies and the American people should not be done in secret. The American people deserve a public debate. The United States has a long standing principle of keeping our intelligence and military spy apparatus focused on foreign adversaries and not the American people.
The letter points out that while Congress has granted the NSA "extraordinary authority" to conduct warrantless surveillance and harvest massive amounts of data, it has not done so for domestic intelligence and law enforcement agencies. But that deliberate limitation of powers has been undone by the administration's expansion. It may be indirect -- requiring the assistance of the NSA -- but it accomplishes the same purpose: giving warrantless surveillance and bulk collection powers to domestic agencies by proxy.

The letter -- sent to the heads of a variety of Congressional committees -- pulls no punches in its comparative depiction of this overreach.
We believe allowing the NSA to be used as an arm of domestic law enforcement is unconstitutional. Our country has always drawn a line between our military and intelligence services, and domestic policing and spying. We do not -- and should not -- use U.S. Army Apache helicopters to quell domestic riots; Navy Seal Teams to take down counterfeiting rings; or the NSA to conduct surveillance on domestic street gangs.
What's most amazing about the administration's move is that it followed -- directly -- two and a half years of NSA document leaks, their accompanying protests, lawsuits and backlash, the passage of the USA Freedom Act and an intense debate over the lawfulness of the PATRIOT Act. Add to that the fact that it was dropped right in the middle of a heated legal battle that has shown the FBI to be both grasping for power and incapable of telling the truth -- and it clearly shows the administration is so insulated from the collateral damage of a decade-plus of constantly expanding surveillance powers as to be completely unable to detect shifts in tone.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blake farenthold, data sharing, doj, dragnet, fbi, minimization, nsa, ted lieu

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    GEMont (profile), 25 Mar 2016 @ 11:45pm

    Eyes Wide Shut

    "to be completely unable to detect shifts in tone."


    they just don't give a shit what the American public think about their domestic spying, because they're:

    1. totally insulated from any and all repercussions for their unconstitutional actions by secret interpretations of US laws that trump the standard interpretations of those same laws whenever these agencies are involved.

    2. completely protected by a government that refuses to rein in the activities of their spy agencies, and which in fact, desires the expansion of surveillance on US citizens due to the Wars on Druggies, Hackers and Terrorists.

    3. utterly unafraid of a judicial/court system that is wide open to blackmail and coercion by the spy agencies, when its members are not openly rooting for the surveillance state.

    To put this another way:

    Can anyone out there give me one good reason why the Surveillance Corporation of Ameri Co. Inc should do anything but thumb their noses at all Americans and all their demands of constitutional behaviour??

    No. Not a moral reason. They obviously have no morals. Otherwise they would respect American's privacy, tell the truth in court, and stop beating their spouses.

    I'm asking for a reason that would compel them to stop domestic spying... you know - like punishment, repercussions, sanctions, loss of employment - that sort of thing.

    That's right. There is no mechanism or process available to the American Public that can cause these agencies or their employees any grief whatsoever, no matter how heinous their actions. They are beyond all American laws.

    Which pretty much makes them all non-Americans.

    Why is it so difficult for the vast majority of Americans to see the writing on the wall??

    Who are you people and what have you done with my America??


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.