Did You Hear About How ISIS Has A Sophisticated Training Manual For Encryption? Yeah, It Was Actually A Pamphlet For Journalists And Activists
from the fud-fud-fuddy-fud-fud dept
Did you hear that story about how ISIS is so sophisticated with encryption that they have a special “opsec” manual on computer security protocols? You might have, because last week it was all over the internet. Yahoo kicked it off with a story, claiming it was the secret manual ISIS “uses to teach its soldiers about encryption.” Wired followed up with its own story, as did The Telegraph. The “manual” was “discovered” by analysts at the Combating Terrorism Center, based out of the US Military Academy at West Point. Thankfully, Buzzfeed has the details, noting that the guide, created by a cybersecurity firm in Kuwait, named Cyberkov, is actually a guide for journalists and activists to protect their communications from oppressive governments. And there’s nothing particularly secret about it, as apparently it’s basically just repurposed stuff from the EFF’s website:
?Our guide is based on publicly available tools, instructions and best practices. The guidelines in our manual are sourced from the EFF [Electronic Frontier Foundation] and other sources of privacy organizations,? wrote CyberKov CEO Abdullah AlAli to BuzzFeed News in an email. He said his organization had no idea its guide had been repurposed by ISIS. He was surprised to see it cited in articles, many of which have been updated since they were originally posted to note the document?s origin, and ?even more shocked to see the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point simply Google-Translated it and claimed it as ISIS?s.?
Now, it does appear that some folks in ISIS may have sent around versions of the guide, but it sort of undermines the idea that they had created their own special set of guidelines to avoid being tracked, when all they’re doing is picking up publicly available information on security best practices.
Filed Under: activists, encryption, isis, journalists, privacy, tech manual, tor
Comments on “Did You Hear About How ISIS Has A Sophisticated Training Manual For Encryption? Yeah, It Was Actually A Pamphlet For Journalists And Activists”
So of course the takeaway will be that EFF is helping terrorists.
Re: Re:
Of course they are, aren’t they part of that “Silicon Valley Menace”?
Re: Re:
Because lying and defaming your ‘enemies’ is just SOP for certain elements of the US Administration.
Re: Re:
No. The takeaway is that journalists are terrorists.
Could someone please send a copy to our government and businesses?
Re: Re:
Are you implying that they do not know how to find it themselves?;-)
Re: Re: Re:
Our government couldn’t find their backsides with both hands.
O M G – and are the children using it, too?!
– Dianne Feinstein, probably
"Best practices" aid our enemies!
The American Automobile Association publishes a brochure about vehicle maintenance issues in sandy, dry, dusty climates. Traitors! If not for that pamphlet, all IS vehicles would be dead and disabled in great heaps across the desert, and the terrorists would be defeated!
Re: "Best practices" aid our enemies!
No, they use Toyotas.
For good guys only
I think Silicon Valley should create a manual that only the “good guys” can use. With the trillions spent on technology, surely they can do that.
D. Feinstein
/sarc
Re: For good guys only
Oh please, oh please, oh please can we make good-guys only gear into a meme.
Re: Re: For good guys only
There’s a Chuck Norris joke in here somewhere.
Now WHICH government is oppressive?
Just maybe it is our own? The US government?
Brantly (who planted this lie) violated the West Point honor code
“For the past few days, many articles around the world started referencing an alleged ISIS OPSEC manual that is claimed to be unearthed by the U.S Military Academy Combating Terrorism Center at West Point by Dr. Aaron Brantly and other researchers.”
Dr. Aaron Brantly of the U.S Military Academy violated the West Point honor code:
“A cadet will not *lie*, cheat, steal, or *tolerate those who do*”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadet_Honor_Code
Re: Brantly (who planted this lie) violated the West Point honor code
Is he a cadet?
Re: Brantly (who planted this lie) violated the West Point honor code
“A cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do“
Then how do they tolerate serving under those who do?
When the thing you take away from this article is...
We really need more of these manuals right here!
What does that tell one about our own leaders?
What next? Burner Playstations?
Carrie Mathison & Peter Quinn buy ’em by the dozen.
Carefull western status quo governments, carefull, your true intentions are showing….
The laws they create for terrorists are the laws they’ll never voluntarilly rescind, the laws they plan to subjucate on a “free” society……..terrorism the excuse for their crimes
Criminals vs criminals
It’s obvious that EFF equals ISIS.
Thankfully Buzzfeed has the detials…
There are just so many things wrong with that.
Re: Not true
Believe it or not, since Buzzfeed actually started doing news they have had a few really good scoops that nobody else was covering.
OK. Most of the content is clickbait drivel but they do pickup some really good stuff.
Re: Re: Not true
Ten Shocking ISIS News Stories They Don’t Want You To See!
Looks like The Telegraph have edited thier piece
Looks like The Telegraph have edited their piece
You mean journalists and activists are NOT terrorists?
They’re considered as much in the US, especially by all those fun agencies like FBI, CIA, NSA, etc.
LBJ took the IRT
Down to 4th Street USA
When he got there
What did he see?
The youth of America on LSD
Re: You mean journalists and activists are NOT terrorists?
Of course they are! See how nicely it all fits together?
>can we make good-guys only gear into a meme.
It’s not just gear anymore. There are, you know, numbers that only good guys can use, formulas only good guys can count, math facts that are only true in the presence of good guys.
And it’s important here to understand that “good” is a subset of “American”. No furriner, no matter how apparently good, can ever hope to use one of these special numbers, calculate one of these special formulas, or be aware in any way of these special math facts.
Which explains why there are so many people complaining that “secure backdoors” is an oxymoron.
You see, the existance of the numbers, formulas, and mathematical identities that allows the presence of “secure backdoors” CANNOT BE COMPREHENDED BY BAD GUYS AND FOREIGNERS. Which allows a simple way to determine who’s evil. ANYONE WHO DOESN’T ADMIT THE EXISTANCE OF SECURE BACKDOORS INTO ENCRYPTED MATERIAL is either a foreigner or a bad guy. There’s no point in arguing with them. Because of their status as evil-or-foreign, they live in a universe where secure backdoors are impossible. And Good[*] Americans live in that other universe, where secure backdoors can be called into being by legislative action, where PI can be 3 if needed, all square roots are rational and all primes factorable.
[*]For, of course, all values of “good” approximating “chiropteroid-excreta lunacy” to within the desired degree of delusion.
Bah!
The manuals aren’t the story. The real story is the idiot “news services” that create and pick up such stories. But then, you have to remember that these services are in the business of creating headlines and click bait for sales purposes. Whether the “story” is actually relevant or factual is immaterial – gotta get them sales, ya know.
Is this admitting then that the government considers journalists who seek to do things with privacy are terrorists?
yahoo.