Russia 'Investigating' Apple Over The Diabolical Menace That Is LGBT-Friendly Emojis
from the sanctioned-bigotry dept
Russia’s been nothing but busy since passing its 2013 LGBT propaganda law, designed to protect minors from the terrifying menace of “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships” while upholding “family values” through government-encouraged discrimination and hatred. The law has had two major benefits for the Russian government; allowing Putin and friends to use homophobia to encourage distrust of heathens in the West (at the cost of increased violence against the LGBT community), while providing feeble justification for the country’s heavy-handed censorship efforts.
Most attempted enforcement of the law is comical in nature, like the government’s apparent decision recently to “investigate” Apple for violating the law with a several-year-old set of LGBT-friendly….emojis (which Apple included back in iOS update 8.3). The “investigation” was apparently prompted by a Russian lawyer by the name of Yaroslav Mikhailov, who has previously had political opposition journalists investigated for their comical posts to Instagram:
“The case, brought by police in Russia’s Kirov region 600 miles northeast of Moscow, follows a complaint by a local attorney named Yaroslav Mikhailov, Russian newspaper Gazeta reported. Mikhailov argued that that Apple is violating Russia’s ban on so-called “gay propaganda” in the presence of minors by including the emojis in the iOs 8.3 package. The case, opened last month, is awaiting expert analysis of the cartoon motifs to determine whether they count as “gay propaganda,” the newspaper reported.
According to an older report by Russia’s Izvestia newspaper, the investigation was also prompted by a complaint from Mikhail Marchenko, a Russian senator who apparently believes the more racially diverse and LGBT-inclusive emojis somehow “disrespect” traditional families:
“Mr Marchenko claims the symbols – which depict smiley-faced same-sex couples – violate a controversial 2013 law which prohibits promotion of non-traditional sexual relationships. The law allows Russian authorities to block access to websites deemed to promote homosexuality. Mr Marchenko said in his complaint that the emojis “promoted non-traditional sexual relationships”, “denied family values” ??and showed “disrespect for parents and other family members.”
These are, apparently, the moral-fabric-eroding cartoon representations that have some so deeply, deeply offended:
Filed Under: emoji, investigation, lgbt, propaganda, russia
Companies: apple
Comments on “Russia 'Investigating' Apple Over The Diabolical Menace That Is LGBT-Friendly Emojis”
Why is this even a thing?
Completely useless icons anyway just find some “app” to delete them and be done with it.
Insert Sarcasm
Damn LBGT Space Invaders ruining traditional marriage.
Re: Insert Sarcasm
Its even worse: They are controlling the world through a secret society!
Another example...
…of cultural wars cited in another article’s comments.
Protecting the Sanctity of Traditional Bigotry
Mike Huckabee should be along any moment now to tell us which emojis violate the Constitution.
As long as the swastika is banned in Europe I cant really argue against this.
Re: Re:
The swastika is not banned in Europe. There was a proposal to ban the swastika in EU wide anti-racism laws, but there was enough opposition that it was dropped.
It’s banned in Germany and a couple other individual countries within Europe.
In any case how do you equate the Nazi symbol, under which millions were killed, with an icon of a same-sex couple? It’s like claiming “As long as slavery is banned in the US I cant really argue against banning encryption.”
Re: Re: Re:
Banning speech is banning speech. What the symbol represents is irrelevant. What matters is that it’s a government going “We don’t like this symbol, it is now banned. Anyone who uses it will face a court of law.”
Re: Re: Re:
A lot of people have been killed in history for being LGBT too.
In any case, I think Russia needs to take this up with the Unicode group — Apple is just implementing characters in that character set.
As for the swastika… I’m sure I’ve got some quilts around with a swastika pattern on them (different colors) as that was a pretty common quilting pattern before the Nazis got their hands on it. It was also a religious symbol that had nothing to do with Aryan ideals. I prefer reclaiming symbols for society to banning them, as it tends to result in changed attitudes instead of suppressed counter-cultural behavior.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
“It was also a religious symbol that had nothing to do with Aryan ideals.”
Is, not was. Last year a got a wall hanging as a gift from a friend in India. It depicts Ganesh and has swastikas in the corners. Those swastikas are being used in their religious context and have nothing to do with Nazis.
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
It depicts Ganesh and has swastikas in the corners.
Don’t the arms go the opposite direction of the Nazi symbol?
Re: Re: Re:3 Re:
No, that’s the native American swastika.
Re: Re:
You could, y’know, oppose both the banning of the swastika in some countries in Europe AND Russia’s horrible homophobic policies. Just a thought.
Re: Re:
“As long as the swastika is banned in Europe I cant really argue against this.”
Why not? I have no problem arguing against both things, since they are really the same thing.
“You know what I blame this on the downfall of? Society.” ~ Moe the Bartender
And why exactly did we ever need anything beyond the round yellow “smiley” face anyway? A face is a face is a face as far as “emoji” go.
Homophobia?
Whenever I read statements about “homophobia” I wonder if there really is a “fear” of homosexuals.
I do see homosexism, which, like racism, is “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different sexual orientation based on the belief that one’s own sexual orientation is superior.”
Re: Homophobia?
Yes, it’s fear. Fear tends to be the first instinct when encountering something you don’t understand, and there’s good reasons this instinct was selected for via evolution. Unfortunately, that instinct doesn’t translate well into the modern world where you encounter unfamiliar things on a regular basis. And the way to get over this particular fear is through exposure to the actual thing – which provides that understanding – instead of whatever strawman argument is put up of it. It’s even starting to work on the Republicans (albeit slowly).
Re: Homophobia?
All prejudice is rooted in fear.
And yet, these guys have no issue with the Russian mob creating CP…
😛
Of course Homophobia is real.
People aren’t objectively supremacist; they acquire their supremacy though the culture they live in and the cultural values they believe and associate to themselves.
Fear has been the driving factor behind much of public distaste for Homosexuality: ie: ‘Homosexuals are all Pedophiles’ and ‘Homosexuals all inspire sin’.
Something tells me you’re a troll, so I’m done with this comment. Go back to The Internet Research Co.
Is the author just mad that Putin pwned Obama at the UN regarding all the people Obama got killed, maimed and displaced by fucking up Ukraine and Syria? That we’re on the brink of nuclear annihilation again matters little compared to a few little laws he doesn’t like, that although when he was a kid in the 80’s, wouldn’t even have needed a law for people to say this is ridiculous and it affected no one? Can it be possible that a high school of just 1400 students has zero people who are not straight in it?
The rhetorical question at the end is kind of a trick question…it could evoke having to read the Russian law correctly through no american-media filters.
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Sep 29th, 2015 @ 2:53pm
Oh look Putins internet troll army has shown up and vomited bullshit all over the page. I think I speak for all Techdirters here when I say “Piss off cunt.”
Re: Re:
Bullshit law is bullshit (and makes you look afraid too), no matter the filters.
Re: Re:
This is rich even for a troll. The obviously incoherent relativism and the pointing to conservatistic ideological narrow-mindedness when it comes to history, doesn’t really help.
There is a single point where this post could have had some relevant critique for the OP, but it was missed entirely since the attack on non-nationalistic people was more important than reasoning.
Does anyone else think the girl in pink doing karate on the bottom of that image is totally hot? How dare those Russian bastards deny us such awesome emoticons. No wonder they lost the cold war.
Re: Re:
“Does anyone else think the girl in pink doing karate on the bottom of that image is totally hot?”
I thought she was doing ballet, but yes, totally hot..!
In Russia, Techdirt trolls you!