FCC May Finally Include Price & Usage Caps When Weighing Broadband Deployment Progress

from the welcome-to-2015 dept

The FCC's long history of ignoring the broadband duopoly's stranglehold over telecom markets has at times bordered on the comedic. This is, after all, the agency that required 36 public workshops, 9 field hearings, 31 public notices and 376 pages to craft a "National Broadband Plan" that went well out of its way to avoid doing anything substantive about the lack of broadband competition. And only the FCC could spend $300 million on a broadband mapping website that completely omits price, while routinely hallucinating both competitors and available speeds.

If the FCC has an area of expertise, it has historically been empty broadband lip service and elaborate, theatrical dance routines designed to protect the status quo.

But under Tom Wheeler, we're actually starting to see this change a little bit. For example, Wheeler recently pushed the agency to bump the definition of broadband to 25 Mbps, to highlight how three-quarters of American homes lack more than one option for real broadband service. Under Wheeler, for the first time in fifteen years, the FCC is no longer pretending that U.S. broadband is robustly competitive. He's still been reticent to acknowledge high prices or the fact that broadband users are consistently gouged with misleading, below the line fees, but baby steps, right?

Now the agency has announced it is fielding inquiries on whether or not it should include usage caps, overage fees, pricing and latency when crafting its annual Broadband Progress Report on the state of broadband competition:
"Today’s Notice of Inquiry further seeks comment on whether to consider standards beyond speed when assessing broadband deployment, including latency and consistency of service. And it asks whether to consider factors beyond physical deployment, including pricing and data allowances, privacy, and broadband adoption."
That's not great news for lagging broadband ISPs, given that the FCC's most recent Broadband Deployment Report already found that 55 million Americans -- 17 percent of the population -- lack access to advanced broadband, and over half of all Americans lack access to broadband at speeds of 25 Mbps down, 3 Mbps up. Factor in price, actual line performance, and whether a connection is hampered with bandwidth caps and overages, and those statistics could very quickly get much, much uglier. The FCC has also told the GAO that it may start factoring in streaming video performance when reporting on whether competitive broadband is being successfully deployed.

All told, the FCC's proposed changes will make it harder than ever for incumbent broadband ISPs to pretend that nothing's wrong with the U.S. broadband market. Not that they won't keep trying, since at this point pretending U.S. broadband is infallible is sort of a national pastime and full-time job for incumbent ISPs and their armies of paid telecom policy wonks.

Filed Under: broadband, deployment, fcc, price, usage caps


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Aug 2015 @ 8:18pm

    And I may win the lottery. Face it if it does include that information numerous caveats and exceptions will be included thus making my winning the lottery twice more likely

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Aug 2015 @ 3:58am

    good for them! this sort of thing is desperately needed, just as this 'up to' speed analysis needs changing as well! how can any company be allowed to get away with posting a speed when even setting up in the same room as the ISP equipment wont get the speeds advertised. even stating an average speed for the service wont be any better. the lowest speed possible at a specific distance should be quoted and if it isn't anywhere near that, the customer should have a choice of a free transfer to another ISP!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Broadband Shill, 15 Aug 2015 @ 10:45am

    We don't need the government muddying up the broadband market for us. The government doesn't know how to run a broadband business better than private companies. The only purpose the government should serve is to give us monopolies. Other than that they should stay out because free market capitalism is best.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.